8:59 AM, 30th November 2012, About 13 years ago 10
Text Size
Categories:
We have received a “Readers Question” from a landlord called Cissie asking whether her friend ought to purchase landlords liability insurance for his flat even though the freeholder insures the buildings.
Cissie wrote:-
“Good morning mark,
I was asked by a friend as he has a let flat in a big block which has the building insurance covered by the freehold company included in service charge. He was asking if he needs to buy separate insurance to cover landlord’s liability as the agent asked him to do so. I personally haven’t purchased extra insurance for the same situation but I would like to hear your advice on this issue.
Many thanks and best regards
Cissie”
Hi Cissie
This is a very interesting question, thank you for raising it.
It’s not a legal requirement for landlords to purchase landlords liability insurance for flats but I do so myself and strongly recommend it.
Many landlords make the mistake in thinking that the freeholders insurance will cover their landlords liability. This is rarely the case.
We have all seen the adverts from no win no fee claims companies on the TV with slogans such as “if there is blame there is a claim”. Let me give you some examples of what could go wrong.
The list goes on.
The other thing that landlords rarely consider is the cost of defending claims. You may well have done nothing wrong but if you find yourself on the wrong end of a No Win No Fee lawyer you may well feel the need to get a lawyer of your own. If you have landlords liability insurance you are covered for that. If not, where is the money going to come from to pay for your legal advice?
I always purchase £10,000 of contents cover, even on unfurnished leasehold properties and bolt landlords liability insurance on to that policy. It’s so cheap it’s not worth taking the risk, I’d rather pay the premiums than risk paying the price if a claim ever did arise. I’ve not had a claim in over 20 years of being a landlord but one big accident claim could wipe me out so I’m not about to take the risk.
If you are not aware of the landlords buying group I set up to get a better deal on landlords insurance please check out this article >>> https://www.property118.com/index.php/landlords-buying-group/32083/
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Credit Card Scam Warning
c Z
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since December 2014 - Comments: 16
19:26 PM, 30th November 2012, About 13 years ago
Mark, thank you very much for your answer and its very helpful.
Cissie
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1:59 AM, 1st December 2012, About 13 years ago
I would normally agree completely with the response above but I would say definnitely check your block insurance policy. Recently I reviewed all mine, and in one block discovered that the buildings insurance arrange with the freeholder included subletting and also included property and public liability insurance for the leaseholder. No doubt we are paying extra for this inclusion but it did occur to me that this would be a good addition for those who own just the one property they are renting, and may not have considered landlord insurance. It is also important to know what your block insurance covers you for, as if you buy landlord insurance and you are also covered with the block insurance for the same area of cover, it might make any claim more complicated to resolve as only one will pay out.
Joe Bloggs
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 646 - Articles: 1
10:52 AM, 1st December 2012, About 13 years ago
all the scenarios listed above would have excellent defences to any potential claim. if the carpet defect was not reported/known then the landlord is not liable. the contractors fail was due to contributory negligence, as was the the flood or fire (and alternative accommodation cover is in the building policy, not liability policy!)
c Z
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since December 2014 - Comments: 16
13:01 PM, 1st December 2012, About 13 years ago
Thanks Yvette, very good suggestion.!
Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12120 - Articles: 1363
15:11 PM, 1st December 2012, About 13 years ago
Exactly the point I was trying to make, who would pay to defend the incoming litigation? I’m sure you can think of other examples where the landlord would have no basis for defence too?
Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12120 - Articles: 1363
16:15 PM, 1st December 2012, About 13 years ago
Hi Yvette
I can see how the freeholder could claim on the Public Liability to defend spurious claims and also where he has no defence but I can’t see how you could claim on the freeholders policy where the tenant is litigating against you.
Joe Bloggs
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 646 - Articles: 1
8:51 AM, 4th December 2012, About 13 years ago
personally i would defend such scurrilous claims myself as i hold the legal profession in low regard generally. in fact i have done and when presented with a robust defence it went away. solicitors do have a conflict of interest to drag out rather than strike out. im sure there are better scenarios, but if the management is good these are very rare IMO.
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
8:46 AM, 4th April 2013, About 13 years ago
I already asked this too to a lawyer friend. Yes, it is not required to get landlords liability insurance but just to get prepared you also have to purchase one for yourself.
Mary Latham
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2011 - Comments: 882 - Articles: 30
11:01 AM, 5th April 2013, About 13 years ago
I always take out additional landlords cover on my flats and this includes public liability – which in my opinion is THE most important insurance a landlord can have. I pay £53 a year per flat for this cover and I hope I waste every penny but I would not be without it.
An on-going case where a child who visited a tenant fell on a stair case is a lesson to us all. The landlord is being sued for loss of earnings and care for the rest of the poor childs life. The landlord is insured and the Insurance company expect to pay over £100k in legalk fees alone and I don’t want to think how many millions for the rest
Follow me on Twitter@landlordtweets
Colin McNulty
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since August 2013 - Comments: 161
15:15 PM, 13th November 2015, About 10 years ago
Having just bought my first flat, it’s always nice to search the net for an answer to a question, only to find that property118 has already asked and answered it! Thanks Mark.