Mortgage Express transfer to Rosinca Mortgages – anyone else?

Mortgage Express transfer to Rosinca Mortgages – anyone else?

8:23 AM, 12th February 2018, About 6 years ago 162

Text Size

My wife and I have just had a letter from Mortgage Express to say that our 11 Buy to Let loans are being transferred this month to Rosinca Mortgages a trading name of Topaz Finance ltd.

Our loans are on the beloved tracker rate. The letter states that the existing terms and conditions will not change.

Our LTV is sitting just below 60%, perhaps this is the level they can get to offload the loans ?

Anyone else had this letter yet?

Many thanks

Darrell

Editors Note:

From UKAR page >> http://www.bbg.co.uk/landlords/transfer-rosinca

“Rosinca Transfer

Important information about the sale and transfer of a portfolio of mortgage accounts to Rosinca Mortgages

If one or more of your mortgages was included in the transfer to Rosinca Mortgages (Rosinca), we will write to you in February 2018 explaining this. If we do not write to you, then your account(s) are not included in the transfer.

Your personal information
All personal and financial data relating to your account(s) will be transferred to Rosinca. Please be assured that we will always comply with our legal obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998. We will retain details of our relationship with you to comply with our regulatory obligations.

Find out more >

The relevant Credit Reference agencies will be notified of the transfer(s) of legal title and they will update your report accordingly. They may send you an automated notification about this, which will be for information only. This change will have no impact on your credit score.

More information >

The new Rosinca Mortgages website will soon be up and running. When this happens, this page will be updated with a direct link to the new site. In the meantime, please read through the Frequently Asked Questions – see below.

Rosinca Mortgages FAQ page >”


Share This Article


Comments

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

10:58 AM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by David Wilson at 13/02/2018 - 10:50
mark@property118.com

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

11:02 AM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

I'm hoping to persuade Neil Patterson to put a Freedom of Information request into UKAR asking whether the loans were sold at par value against outstanding balances or whether the sale of the portfolio was at a discount, and if so, at how many penny in the £.

Results to be published here so watch this space folks!

jonney

11:10 AM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

Mark - I've 6 MX loans and all say after the fix period they are on 'Buy-to-Let Variable Rate' BUT I cannot find this defined anywhere in the paperwork that I have. You seem adament that these reversion rates are trackers - where does your confidence come from please? It would help my own confidence to know!! many thanks. Jon

Richard of York

11:10 AM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

Hi,

We also received our letter yesterday transferring all but two of our MX mortgages to Rosinca - these are now all at 1.75% over base and were taken out with MX between 2004 & 2008. The two which have not transferred were originally GMAC mortgages from 2003, which were taken over by MX at a later date - not sure if that is relevant. One of these is at the variable of 4.89% so it looks like a good opportunity to refinance! After my previous enquiry about loan redemption with MX - and the ensuing nightmare - they were much nicer once I'd told them I was recording all our conversations - I decided that the higher rate on just one loan was a small price to pay.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

11:18 AM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Jon Bourne at 13/02/2018 - 11:10
Hi Jon

My former business was one of the key partners of MX. I am not aware of MX ever having funded BTL mortgages where the reversion rate isn't a tracker. By all means scan and email me your offer letters and KFI documents too if you wish - mark@property118.com

BAZ MAC

11:37 AM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

Have I missed a trick here? It specifies in Clause 13 :-
"Will my current Arrangement To Pay (ATP) be maintained?
Yes. If you have a payment arrangement to clear your arrears, there will be no change to your existing ATP as a result of this transfer." An interest only arrangement is deliberately excluded and I suspect that this indicates the end of this type of mortgage.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

11:43 AM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by BAZ MAC at 13/02/2018 - 11:37
Hi Baz

Take another look at the letter MX sent to you, in particular their point 4.

What is the "trick" you think you might be missing?

Richard Adams

12:02 PM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

I've now received my letter re sale of my MX mortgage to Rosinca. It clearly states that transfer of legal title will be completed "shortly". This reminds me of the mortgage securitisation issue that arose in this forum awhile back, namely firms of lawyers approaching the likes of us to employ them to seek compensation where sales of mortgages had happened and transfer of title had NOT happened.

Since when the matter was aired it was concluded that non transfer of title was not grounds for any compensation why are MX & Rosinca bothering to do it? It must be one hell of an admin exercise to undertake for 1000's of mortgages.

BAZ MAC

12:23 PM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Mark Alexander at 13/02/2018 - 11:43
Hi Mark. With an Interest Only Mortgage there is no contribution towards the arrears. Section 13 specifically refers to "an arrangement to clear your arrears". I suspect that was deliberately worded in order to avoid any guarantee for the holders of an interest only mortgage.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

12:43 PM, 13th February 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by BAZ MAC at 13/02/2018 - 12:23
Hi Baz

Are you suggesting the intention is to switch the terms to repayment?

If so, that would fall foul of point 4 of their letter. Besides, nothing in any correspondence can override the original contract unless all parties formally agree.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now