1 month ago | 6 comments
Social housing landlords already have strong powers to deal with anti-social behaviour, the government has claimed.
In a parliamentary written answer, Labour’s Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said the Crime and Policing Act had strengthened the powers available to police to deal with anti-social behaviour.
The news comes as a Labour MP suggested PRS landlords should take a greater role in tackling anti-social behaviour caused by tenants.
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said: “Social housing landlords already have a wide range of tools to tackle anti-social behaviour, and the Regulator of Social Housing’s neighbour and community standard already requires registered providers to work with relevant partners to deter and tackle anti-social behaviour and hate incidents.
“Recent legislation has strengthened these powers even further. The Crime and Policing Act, which received Royal Assent in April, has strengthened the powers available to the police and other agencies, including stronger measures to deal with the most persistent offenders.
“The Renters’ Rights Act also shortened the notice period for the mandatory anti-social behaviour eviction ground and once implemented in the social rented sector, landlords will, in cases of anti-social behaviour, be able to make a claim to the court faster.”
As previously reported by Property118, under the Renters’ Rights Act, when using a discretionary ground for possession, PRS landlords will have to prove that anti-social behaviour has occurred, and the court will then decide whether it is reasonable to evict the tenant.
The government guidance provides examples of what counts as anti-social behaviour, covering both criminal and non-criminal behaviour, for example:
However, the government guidance says minor issues such as problems with bins, parking disputes, or one-off incidents do not count as anti-social behaviour.
The government guidance also claims landlords can reduce the risk of anti-social behaviour by asking for a reference from a previous landlord or letting agency.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 month ago | 6 comments
10 months ago | 9 comments
Member Since November 2023 - Comments: 12
8:29 AM, 11th August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
What complete and utter nonsense, like your gonna risk getting stabbed because of an ASBO tenant. No idea what these governments think or operate, it’s like they don’t live in the real world.
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1333
11:18 AM, 11th August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
All of these half ar$ed responses from Government have nothing to do with the issue at hand, ASB in this case. They’re about not increasing the pressure on Council emergency accommodation by allowing tenants to be evicted. Landlords and communities have to suffer the burden.
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 163
2:15 PM, 11th August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Ha! laughable, the police have always had enough power to deal with these problems, for decades. The police won`t turn up unless sufficient people complain, that`s how they prioritise their work. The police decide what crimes they will tackle, not the public.. odd that is`nt it?
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2471
3:04 PM, 11th August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Amjid Ali at 11/08/2026 – 08:29
Labour MPs live in fairyland.
When the Labour Renters Rights Act came along the government banned no-fault evictions, and when they did so they removed ALL the powers that landlords have to deal with anti-social behaviour. That includes anti-social behaviour associated with dogs such as noise nuisance, roaming or straying, defaecation, and aggression or danger caused by out-of-control dogs, or dogs under the control of juveniles.