Evicting tenants for anti-social behaviour under the Renters’ Rights Act

Evicting tenants for anti-social behaviour under the Renters’ Rights Act

Hooded person spray-painting graffiti on a wall alongside an eviction notice graphic, illustrating anti-social behaviour in tenancy cases
12:01 AM, 24th November 2025, 5 months ago 10

The government has issued guidance for landlords on evicting tenants for anti-social behaviour, including the introduction of a new ground for possession.

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, when using a discretionary ground for possession, landlords will have to prove that anti-social behaviour has occurred, and the court will then decide whether it is reasonable to evict the tenant.

Previously, a Labour Minister claimed that the Renters’ Rights Act will help tackle anti-social behaviour.

What counts as anti-social behaviour?

The government guidance provides examples of what counts as anti-social behaviour, covering both criminal and non-criminal behaviour, for example:

  • causing a nuisance to neighbours
  • noise
  • verbal abuse, harassment and threats
  • drug use or drug dealing
  • vandalism
  • graffiti
  • fly-tipping and littering
  • discarding syringes or needles
  • issues with pets

However, the government guidance says minor issues such as problems with bins, parking disputes, or one-off incidents do not count as anti-social behaviour.

The government guidance also claims landlords can reduce the risk of anti-social behaviour by asking for a reference from a previous landlord or letting agency.

The guidance adds landlords could include terms in the tenancy agreement that prohibit antisocial behaviour and help tenants understand their responsibilities.

For example:

  • how tenants can let you know if they’ll be making excess noise
  • how tenants can report other tenants committing antisocial behaviour (if you have more than one tenant living in the property)

Landlords will have to provide evidence

However, if the tenant’s behaviour is causing problems, the guidance recommends talking to the tenant directly to resolve any issues and keep an ‘incident diary’ to record any antisocial behaviour involving your tenant.

The government say if the landlord does not feel safe to speak to the tenant, they should report the tenant’s behaviour to the police or local council.

The government guidance also says that if landlords need to go to court, they will need to show that the conditions of the ground or grounds apply by providing evidence, which includes:

  • a record of speaking or writing to your tenant about their behaviour
  • complaints from neighbours or housemates such as witness statements or incident diaries
  • videos or photos
  • information from an antisocial behaviour or noise app where you can log incidents as they happen
  • recordings of noise
  • Statements and reports from witnesses and neighbours

Evicting a tenant for anti-social behaviour

A landlord may be able to evict a tenant for anti-social behaviour using Section 8 grounds under the Renters’ Rights Act.

The government guidance says landlords can give notice using Ground 7A or 14, and will be able to immediately apply to court for a possession order. If landlords use Ground 12, they will need to give the tenant 2 weeks’ notice before applying for a possession order and will be able to use more than one ground.

Landlords can evict a tenant using a discretionary ground and must prove that anti-social behaviour has occurred.

The grounds in the government guidance are:

Ground 14: nuisance, illegal or improper use

Most antisocial behaviour will come under ground 14, which is a discretionary ground.

This behaviour does not have to happen only in your property – it can happen nearby. Ground 14 also covers when your tenant commits a serious offence near your property.

The judge will consider all the factors related to the case. This includes:

  • the impact the behaviour has had, including continuing impact
  • the impact of the behaviour if it is repeated
  • the impact on other tenants in a house of multiple occupation (HMO) where accommodation or facilities are shared
  • if your tenant has responded to attempts to resolve the behaviour

Ground 12: breach of tenancy  

Ground 12 can be used when your tenant has broken one or more of the terms in the tenancy agreement. The court will still need to decide if it is reasonable to evict your tenant.

Evicting a tenant on mandatory grounds

A ‘mandatory ground’ means if your evidence proves the ground is met, the court must give you a possession order.

Ground 7A: antisocial behaviour

If your tenant has engaged in serious criminal behaviour, you will be able to use ground 7A to apply to court for an eviction.

For this ground to be met, your tenant will need to have either:

  • been convicted of a serious criminal offence or breached a previous ‘Injunction to Prevent Nuisance or Annoyance’ (IPNA)
  • breached a criminal behaviour order
  • been convicted of causing noise nuisance

The criminal behaviour will need to have taken place either:

  • in or near the property
  • somewhere that affects you as the landlord, such as the property of someone who lives nearby or who is employed by you

If you rely on a conviction to evict a tenant, landlords will have 12 months from the date of conviction to give notice that you are seeking possession.

Landlords will also be able to use this ground if the council or police have applied for a closure order and access to the premises has been prohibited for more than 48 hours.

Landlords will need to give notice within 3 months of the closure order.

Tenant damaging a property

Landlords should also be aware that if a tenant damages a property, the deposit should be protected with a government-approved Tenancy Deposit Protection (TDP) scheme.

If the tenant causes damage, landlords may retain some or all of the tenancy deposit to cover repair costs.

The government guidance advises landlords to discuss with the tenant how much of the deposit they plan to retain. If both parties agree on the amount, landlords may deduct this from the deposit at the end of the tenancy.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2

    11:06 AM, 24th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    Applies to all landlords except Rachel Reeves.

  • Member Since February 2023 - Comments: 39

    11:08 AM, 24th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    You’ll never remove anyone with these grounds. Meeting the evidence bar to persuade a judge will be impossible.
    You’re better off not renting to anyone without perfect referencing.
    Eventually after some years of the people experiencing more ASB there might (big might) be an amendment to fix this.

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1642 - Articles: 3

    11:49 AM, 24th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    Without a criminal conviction, you won’t succeed, and even then, it will be down to the judge to decide if eviction is reasonable for the feckless tenant. Also, as we know, it could be years from the time of an offence to conviction, and meantime, the feckless tenant can continue with the ASB. Add to that, the time it will take for an eviction to go through the courts, and many landlords will have retired!

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 781

    12:52 PM, 24th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    If you need convincing – take a look at the TEMPORARY closure orders issued by judges after years of serious ASB like drug dealing. I really can’t see anything here which encourages me.

    In the past I have used Section 21 to deal with ASB, the neighbours were not willing to be identified and could never have been persuaded to go to court.

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1642 - Articles: 3

    2:32 PM, 24th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 24/11/2025 – 12:52
    My tenant was holding drink and drug fuelled parties in my flat… during lockdown… and the police did nothing. He and his party ‘guests’ intimidated the neighbours, and he was arrested for downloading child porn using a neighbour’s Wi-Fi. A disabled woman who got a visit from the police who accused her of the crime. I subsequently found he had previous for this.

    My solicitor said I stood little chance of using ASB to evict him, but fortunately, I was able to use serious arrears. When he was finally evicted 15 months later, he still hadn’t come up in court for his criminal offence.

  • Member Since February 2019 - Comments: 16

    10:31 PM, 24th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    I’ve asked the police and NHS for statements regarding an anti social tenant.
    Their reply – “sorry it’s against the data protection act”….”we can’t even tell you if we attended the property”.

    Grounds for eviction for anti social behaviour are going to be very difficult to prove! And this is goingvto lead to whole neighbourhood being blighted.

    I’m only renting to couples over 30 and in a professional job from now on…..

  • Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2

    9:14 AM, 25th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Dave at 24/11/2025 – 22:31
    “I’m only renting to couples over 30 and in a professional job from now on…..”

    An activity which I believe will be illegal after the 1 May.

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1642 - Articles: 3

    10:25 AM, 25th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 25/11/2025 – 09:14
    Yes, but nothing to stop private preferences when presented with a number of applicants. The challenge will be to obtain detailed references, especially when using an agent. My latest tenant referencing did not include details of existing/previous landlord and I had to ask for it.

    I’ve heard the arguments about the potential for an existing landlord to provide a good reference if it means moving on a bad tenant, and I suspect the RRA will push some landlords into such dishonesty in that respect. But my tenant was moving from the South to the North for work, so I felt it was ‘safe’.

  • Member Since February 2019 - Comments: 16

    11:09 AM, 25th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 25/11/2025 – 09:14
    Thank you for your observation Maluka.
    Your bio is very interesting!
    In reply.
    With 50+ applicants for every advertised rental in Wrexham, I am very lucky that I have a choice of tenants..and will choose the best fit for my business model.(nothing illegal there)..this is because over 450 landlords have left the market here (official figures from a meeting with the Council last Thursday) in the last few years.

    I hope this landlord exodus does not happen in England…..Otherwise great people will be made homeless.
    As landlords we are all tired of this toxic culture engendered by gen rent, etc al and successive governments.

  • Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 28

    8:04 PM, 25th November 2025, About 5 months ago

    This is HILARIOUS.

    There’s no way you’re getting NEAR a court for many many months. And when you do, it’s DISCRETIONARY.So NO CHANCE of an eviction

    I happened to have the foresight that labour were incoming. Binned my entire portfolio.

    I sleep VERY well

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or