3 weeks ago | 7 comments
Apparently, landlords in Greater Manchester are to get a special programme to help them understand how to be landlords.
Somewhere in government, that need ought to prompt an awkward question.
Would complying with the rules be easier if the government and councils stopped adding so many of them?
Now there’s the Better Renting programme in Greater Manchester which promises practical tools, a website and help with understanding responsibilities, including licensing.
According to Property118, The Dispute Service Group and Nationwide Foundation are behind it.
Is it useful? Potentially. But before anyone celebrates another source of guidance, I would like to know why the people expected to obey the rules are struggling to find their way through them.
The research highlights that landlords in Greater Manchester find it difficult to keep up with policy and consequently they struggle to comply.
And there is an admission in the announcement that deserves attention.
Dr Jennifer Harris, the head of policy at The Dispute Service Group, says: “The vast majority of landlords want to do what is right for their tenants and remain compliant with all their obligations.”
She continues: “However, our research shows that fragmented channels of communication and difficulties accessing official resources are making this harder than it should.”
Take a breath and read that again. Landlords want to comply, but getting hold of the information is harder than it should be.
How has that become the landlord’s problem to solve?
Landlords shouldn’t be expected to go on a time-consuming quest finding the right guidance to comply with a law.
If councils or government must insist that responsible landlords ‘have nothing to fear’, they should their requirements understandable.
Above all else, surely now is the time for somebody in power to question whether another requirement is necessary before deciding how to explain it.
So, can landlords in Greater Manchester answer this: has the Good Landlord Charter made your responsibilities clearer, or left you with more questions?
We also need to examine what a rule requires a landlord to do; how much it costs and what tenants gain from it.
I think we should have an explanation of any proposal for landlords and what it will address and why existing powers cannot deal with it.
The growing burden matters every new requirement shouldn’t be considered in isolation but how it fits in with all of the other duties a landlord must fulfil.
But ask whether a rule is necessary and we will hear an argument about providing decent housing.
The vast majority of landlords already provide safe homes, carry out repairs and meet their responsibilities.
That means we should demand that policymakers justify any new rule they want to impose because both of those expectations belong together.
Paul Dennett, the deputy mayor of Greater Manchester, acknowledges that landlords have been expected to keep pace with increasingly complex rules and responsibilities.
If that’s the case, then let us have a serious conversation about reducing that complexity.
Will this new scheme identify confusing requirements and recommend changes?
Will it tell councils where communication fails?
Will anyone be prepared to say that an obligation duplicates another or achieves too little to justify its cost?
Those would be useful results.
The simplest help this Labour government and councils could offer is to stop piling needless laws, regulations and costs onto landlords already trying to do the right thing.
Let’s review what exists and remove unnecessary duplication.
Make essential landlord requirements understandable, and publish accessible guidance when changes are introduced.
By all means, give landlords practical support but please have the ambition for a system we can reasonably understand and afford to comply with.
Before commissioning another landlord scheme, rules or laws, let’s take a step back and consider whether quite so many obstacles need to be there.
You know, like try a little common sense, preferably before someone decides it needs a licence or a hefty fine to force ‘compliance’.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
5 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Previous Article
Welsh government promises new protections for renters
3 weeks ago | 7 comments
3 weeks ago | 56 comments
3 weeks ago | 3 comments
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3389 - Articles: 83
10:02 AM, 9th October 2026, About 3 weeks ago
You right we are struggling. I am struggling.
I cannot keep up with all the new rules/regs chucked at us, I & my tenants didn’t sign up for this.
The Govt assumes we all want to keep our houses & we will do whatever they bring in if we want to carry on. Well many of us don’t want to carry on & are only keeping the houses for the remaining in situ tenants.
Push us too hard & we then won’t remain loyal to the tenant & no longer respect it’s their home if we get threatened with £7000 fines for a paperwork error.
You correct again:
We also need to examine what a rule requires a landlord to do; how much it costs and what tenants gain from it.
We’ve got the boiler certificate, but we forget to upload to new trumped up database, so we got fined £7000? Huh? Whoever thought of that?
We uploaded all our houses to the new trumped up database, but then we couldn’t the tenants new kitchen, cause Govt had our time & money for the new trumped up database.
I’m the biggest private provider to Benefit tenants in Nottingham over 27 years and not once has the Govt and Council come to ask me What they can do for me, so I and my colleagues will take the people we used to take. I’m probably not now, as sold dozens of houses in the last 15 months.
I’m sending this now so you know my mindset & how this Govt & Council’s are making us ill with unbearable workload. Some of your homes I always thought I would never sell to you or anyone, but if you have anyone that wishes to buy to keep you in, please talk to me.
Below are just some snippets as to what’s going off.
These are the latest changes the Govt has bought in May 2026 the Renter Rights act Renters Rights Bill-They have hurt the majority of tenants, but Govt got more votes off the Renters Groups for bringing them in.
Very long, but all applies to you & your home.
Tenants, Govt has just gave you £33 pm rent increase with rules they said were to protect you
Dear Tenants,
Govt has just bought in yet another charge £65 per year EACH house for property database fee. So you got to have rent increase for that £6pm. Plus 20+ questions, uploading loads of forms, an hour each house, & then updating the database throughout the year whenever a change, boiler certificate etc. And if u forget to upload a new (even if you’ve done it and got it) EPC, Landlady gets fined £7000. Tenants in London love to hear this. You sensible people in Nottingham know it makes your Landlord want to sell.
All this information needed for the property database, the Council already have for your Selective Licensing, who already charge £1000 every 5 years, so £200 per year, so you got £20 pm rent increase for that.
Previously we could just agree between ourselves if rents were £1000 & you were paying £750, you could agree verbally to £775 or £800. Well Govt has put a stop to that costing you again. Govt has said all rent increases must be done by Section 13. Letting agents cost £75 to do this, so that’s another £7pm. Some Letting Agents charge £250+VAT to issue a Section 13 which is £25pm on top of your rent increase.
So before we even get a little rent increase to pay for all inflationary increased costs, you’ve got £33pm which is going straight on the Govt charges.
This is without the extra admin we’ve got 4am office starts 9pm finishes. So no longer small rent increases I’m afraid, we got minimum £83pm before we start.
I could go on & on if some Media outlet would finally tell the truth & put it all out there, cause tenants that had no problem (80%) are really hit hard by all these Govt & Council changes.
A colleague wrote this out:
The regulatory and administrative burden has changed hugely over the years.
When I first started renting properties back in 1989, things were incredibly straightforward. You could go into WH Smith, buy a standard tenancy agreement, photocopy it and get on with letting the property. Today, the paperwork and compliance surrounding a single tenancy can run into hundreds of pages once you include tenancy documentation, deposit protection, EPCs, gas safety, electrical inspections, smoke and carbon monoxide alarms, right to rent checks, prescribed information, licensing requirements, certificates, notices and all the other documentation and administration that has accumulated over the years.
And it is not just the paperwork. There are now countless additional costs, licences, inspections, certificates, software requirements, professional fees, compliance costs, council charges and taxation changes that simply did not exist when many of us started out.
Making Tax Digital is another example. Landlords who fall within the current threshold now have to maintain digital records and use compatible software, with quarterly reporting requirements to HMRC. HMRC itself confirms that landlords may face additional software, accountancy, training and administration costs as a result.
The electrical safety regulations alone now require inspections at least every five years, with reports having to be provided to tenants and councils when requested. Gas safety checks are annual, EPC requirements have been introduced, smoke and carbon monoxide alarm requirements have expanded, and licensing and other local authority requirements can add substantial further costs.
So Mick’s £83 figure is really only scratching the surface. There is a much bigger story here about the cumulative cost of regulation, taxation, compliance and administration, and ultimately a significant proportion of those costs inevitably find their way into the cost of renting.
I honestly think someone needs to sit down and produce a proper historical comparison of what it actually cost to let a property in 1989 compared with what it costs today. I suspect the difference would be quite staggering.
I’ll keep putting this on when people wonder why rents keep going up.
I will add to this list as I remember more.
Keep spreading these words please.
WhyTenantsCan’tGetHouses
A background to why you tenants are paying extortionate rents and can’t get anywhere unless you earning a cracking wage-Blame the Govt and Councils you vote for because you like it when they give more regs & rules to the Landlord-Guess who pays for this? You do.
2015 George Osborne introduce Section 24, fully implemented by 2021, where your rent can be £1000, your mortgage £700 & you still lose money on the house due to the bizarre Tax rules introduced-Look it up, it’s that mad, 6 year old kids say That can’t be right. Too late when you’ve already bought the house in personal name.
They wanted Pet deposits banned.
Cause we’d want £100 more in case dog did damage.
End of tenancy, dog did no damage, tenant got all deposit back.
2019 you banned higher pet deposits cause some tenants didn’t like it when dog did damage & didn’t get their deposit back.
We stopped taking pets.
2024 MP stood up in Parliament and called for Pet deposits to be reinstated cause tenants with pets couldn’t get accommodation.
You couldn’t make this up.
Description here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u54ouYTdNr7WaCPYW18Q_tZdlJr8-VwSUJpE0IcPf5k/edit?usp=drivesdk
They don’t want Landlords helping tenants with Benefits and they bought in Universal Credit which has zero communication with Landlord- We now don’t take Benefit tenants.
They bought in Selective Licensing on good Landlords with good houses. We put the rents up to cover it and now don’t take risky tenants.
Landlord can get fined £30,000 if tenant takes battery out smoke alarm and Landlord CAN’T prove that tenant did it.
Landlord can get fined £30,000 if renting 1 bed flat to single person and he/she moves his/her partner in unbeknown to the Landlord if the Selective License only has license for one occupier.
They started fining Landlords £5000 if they didn’t check tenants passport properly on Right to Rent checks-Landlords stopped taking anyone that had the slightest chance of being illegal immigrant. Innocent UK citizens suffered.
2015, they bought in that if Landlord CANNOT PROVE he/she has gave tenant boiler certificate, you can never get your property back. Even if had a new boiler 5 years later, Judge says Not bothered, u not having your house back. This helped the current bad tenant, hurts the next 100,000 tenants waiting for a home. A purely Anti Landlord measure to stop Landlord getting rid bad tenant or having his house back.
Oct 2024 Unison now wants a rent freeze. Ooh are we a charity are we? What other individual who sells or provides something is told YOU CANNOT charge a price u wish?
Oct 2024 the Renter Rights Bill is going to make it law, u can’t do rent increase unless use Section 13. Now for years, I’ve agreed informally with tenant ‘Ok £25 a month, u still £200pm now below anyone else.’ Job done.
Now, I’m totally full up with paperwork and rules and regs. I have no more time. Section 13 some more say only a few mins. It’s still 30 mins by time printed, filled in, signed, scanned, sent. Each one when u have lots of houses on top of Selective Licensing INSISTING we inspect each house every 4 months (two weeks solid just on inspections every months) is taking me over the edge. My existing tenants are going to have to go with Letting Agent who charge £300 for a Section 13. That’s £25pm extra on the rent. Along with the extra £100pm Letting Agent fee which gets rid of cheap rent was charity. I was only going to charge £25 pm increase. I now have to charge £50pm to get the £25pm charge back the Govt has caused.
Sep 2024 Ed Miliband MP wants all houses to EPC C which will cost Landlords £5000 and increase tenants cheap rents. As soon he announced this, he made more tenants homeless. Few words on that here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eI7z29SNRCDLLwX6_0QQChrwTxZ4jGZw4UNybVYfD1s/edit?usp=drivesdk
Section 24 Tax bought in by George Osborne of the Tories who said it will only affect 1 in 5 Landlords-That’s over 2 million tenants put at risk of homeless. Landlords with tenants of 25 years are now being made homeless on this one action alone.
Oct 2024 I’ve heard there’s a part of the RRB that says we must give tenants our home address on paperwork.
Details of that here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v7aETrvz0j6CdS7LZwYukthZAbhNxLWRKR8qShi6Gok/edit?usp=drivesdk
Aug 2025 RRB
Aug 2025 Making Tax digital
Aug 2025 RRB getting rid of Section 21 so u can’t get rid of bad tenant which would help a good tenant get the house.
Aug 2025 NI on rental income, another retrospective change after you’ve already housed the tenant and agreed to keep their rent lower than others.
Feb 2026 RRB making us register every property & pay-As well as Licensing-On houses many of us don’t want & only keeping for tenants anyway.
I’ll keep saying it to hope some common sense MP takes this up and actually wants to help tenants, and not getting votes hurting Landlords:
April 2026 Govt now fining us £7000 each tenant for every RRA act letter we cannot prove we’ve gave to the tenant-In ten years time. We get fined £7000 for an admin error for a letter the tenant can get off the internet just like we have to. This time Govt gone too far. We Housing Providers. Many of us don’t want the houses & only keeping for the tenant. And you want to fine us £7000 for an error where no one has got hurt?
£7000 for a paperwork error each tenant & even if you have gave em the sheets, if you lose your proof, you’ve had it. I can stab someone & get less. Parking ticket £60. No car insurance £200. Letter that tenants not bothered about £7000?
I tell me Landlord mates in the gym, they can’t believe it. I say It’s really easy, go on Google put £7000 fine Landlord in. They come back next day & say Wow cannot believe it, I would never have never known, that’s it, I’m selling.
I bike Sundays with 10-15 lads. Some have houses, I tell them, they flabbergasted, they had no idea.
I’ve got several expensive (for Nottingham) nice bungalows nice areas I was maybe never gonna’ sell. I’m even selling them now if/when the tenant should ever leave. Govt gone too far now. Renters group love it, but someone please tell em, they’ve now voted for something that’s made their houses more expensive & cut supply. My tenants understand fully what the Govt & Councils are doing to them, they’ve known for years I wish to sell but they now can’t get anywhere any more. All started since George Osborne Sec 24 2015, then Selective Licensing 2018, then UC, the list goes on.
April 2026 the ICO data fee we have to pay every year just so we can give the tenant the plumbers number when they have a leak gushing out.
May 2026, can only issue rent increase by Section 13 when previously could agree verbally with tenant and if rents are £1000, and tenant paying £775, they’d normally agree to £800 job done. Now Govt say must be done by Section 13, I’m getting older and the ever increasing paperwork is frying my brain. Letting agents charges £300 to do a section 13. That’s the rent increase gone on admin, so you have increase more than £25pm-Tenant loses again. Well done Govt.
Aug 2026
Govt has just bought in yet another charge £65 per year EACH house for property database fee. So you got to have rent increase for that £6pm. Plus 20+ questions, uploading loads of forms, an hour each house, & then updating the database throughout the year whenever a change, boiler certificate etc. And if u forget to upload a new (even if you’ve done it and got it) EPC, Landlady gets fined £7000. Tenants in London love to hear this. You sensible people in Nottingham know it makes your Landlord want to sell.
Sep 2026 Govt introduce a property database that is £65 PAID EVERY YEAR EVERY PROPERTY. What does the Govt not understand about that is another £6pm on top of the rent? Who’s benefiting from that?
Every anti Landlord measure they bring in to they think will help the tenant has hurt the tenants massively.
Every time the MP’s talk an anti landlord measure, they’ve made more homeless and increased rents.
There is loads more
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 981
10:07 AM, 9th October 2026, About 3 weeks ago
We are a convenient distraction to blame for the housing crisis, all parties are desperate to keep up this pretence – the public has been manipulated into believing we are rolling in cash and exploiting the poor.
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 97
10:47 PM, 9th October 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 10:02
Perhaps the biggest risk is getting landed with a bad tenant. The consequences of not being able to get redress or access to your property makes being a landlord the trickiest of endeavours.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3389 - Articles: 83
9:29 AM, 10th October 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Paul Smith at 09/10/2026 – 22:47
I’ve got it now, good tenants that’s turned into not great tenants once I’d decided to sell & can’t sell with em in cause of the way they’ve filled every room up in their property.
This is her house https://photos.app.goo.gl/vbhFUBAyX3H4KByB7
So I started Section 21, as usual Legal aid at court for the tenant & I can’t have my own property back cause a boiler date wrong from 10 years ago. And to top it up, unbeknown to me, we have to pay the other sides costs unless I withdraw the claim quick.
We never signed up to this & would not have took these kind of tenants had these laws & rules been in.
Member Since June 2017 - Comments: 162
5:40 PM, 12th October 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Classic government fodder. Make the right noises about seemingly making something easier to navigate when you’ve just made it a lot harder. It’s the caring, sharing, nice open hand of government, open to help, just after it’s slapped you with the back of the same hand. They have to be seen to be doing the right thing, even if they aren’t. I keep seeing episodes of Yes Minister repeated on the telly. Oddly, pretty much all of it is still current.
Oh & why single out us lot in Greater Manchester? Are the poor landlords of Middlesborough, Brighton, Birmingham & the rest of the country not as equally perplexed? I’m not sure if I should be insulted because I’m a Manc & therefore unable to grasp the many new regulations, or if the rest of the country should be more insulted because they aren’t getting the special treatment for Mancs. I suppose this could be discrimination, somehow.
It’s just a sham, a placation exercise that means absolutely nothing. I’m in no way fooled by political, open handed caring after a back handed slap.