UC – MASSIVE arrears & homelessness picking up pace!

by Mick Roberts

8:45 AM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

UC – MASSIVE arrears & homelessness picking up pace!

Make Text Bigger
UC – MASSIVE arrears & homelessness picking up pace!

All Landlords need to read this, as we could all be close soon to having some Universal Credit (UC) tenants. Some of you will no doubt have been following my posts about DWP’s mishandling of my APA (Alternative Pay Arrangements) requests and substantial loss in rental income I’m experiencing.

I have 4 tenants so far on Universal Credit with a 100% failure rate. Some have been with me 16 years, no arrears and now with UC they in arrears.

I have a 5th tenant severely disabled this week going on UC. He can’t use the phone or add, his carer rang DWP & they’ve told him he had to go online to claim UC. Shocking I know and I know UC DWP will say support is there. IT IS NOT! It is not happening on the ground.

With some help from Bill Irvine, I’ve been pursuing compensation with DWP and Esther McVey Secretary of State.

Coincidentally, last evening Neil Couling responded to one of a number of Tweets made by @BillIrvine17. Neil asks Bill to supply details of actual cases to support his accusation that APAs were not being honoured in the tenant’s transition from Live to Full Service. He’s clearly trying to trivialise Bill’s claims suggesting neither the RLA nor any of “his team” were aware of any problem. You can read the thread here: https://twitter.com/NeilCouling/status/1060964537158041601

At the foot of the thread Bill includes a quote from one of DWP’s most senior officers “”Yes …..this is becoming a bigger problem for customers transferring from Live Service to Full. I need to check with UC programme, but I believe when customers migrate any standing arrangement with paying rent direct to the landlord “falls off”. #DWP!

So, contrary to Mr Couling’s suggestion, his senior staff do actually know about the issue, and agree with Bill’s claims of this becoming a big issue for both DWP and landlords.

You may recall some time ago Property118 published an open letter to Mr Couling https://www.property118.com/open-letter-dwp-neil-couling-regarding-universal-credit/98648/ Mr Couling responded by counseling Bill, that he should exercise some caution, suggesting his views were not representative of what was actually happening. More recently, the RLA’s Tom Simcock published research confirming landlords’ experiences in relation to UC. https://research.rla.org.uk/press-release/universal-credit-rent-arrears-rocket-says-new-research/ Tom’s view is backed by the many RLA & Property118 members who have lost a fortune due to tenants moving from HB to UC. The APA scheme which was supposed to protect the interests of tenants & landlords is still not operating as it should.

In August 2015 DWP agreed to suspend payment of the “housing costs” on receipt of an APA, but have since reneged on this promise.

DWP was forced to remove its disastrous policy of “Explicit Consent” in December 2017 due to the lobbying made by the RLA and others. I know from Speaking to Bill he has submitted numerous complaints to DWP and ICE involving landlords who had lost substantial sums in rental income due to DWP continuing to pay delinquent tenants, month after month, despite knowing they had received and misused “housing costs” designed to reduce or extinguish their rental liability.

Surprisingly, Bill received some support from DWP’s Complaints & Resolution staff who actually asked Joanna Wallace, Independent Case Examiner, to expedite the complaints as a form of “class action” believing she would support landlords claims of maladministration and demands for action and compensation. Ms Wallace subsequently refused this request stating her department dealt with complaints on a case by case basis and in date order. So, now we must wait 17/18 months before her staff investigate. Absolutely shocking and unacceptable to all of us!

THIS IS 18 EIGHTEEN MONTHS WITH NO ZERO RENT COMING IN TO PAY MORTGAGE! It don’t take Einstein to suss out you have to evict and then the tenant is homeless.

We need to collectively let DWP know of our concerns by making complaints through its Complaints Process and refer cases to ICE. We need to put in complaint to ICE about their 18 months delays-Guess who funds ICE? Yes, DWP do, so it’s in their interests for ICE to take 18 months to investigate them.

I have Nottingham’s big DWP UC man bringing UC into Nottingham coming to see me next week. So I hijacked one of my tenants meetings at job centre this week to get him some more evidence. The staff at Job centre didn’t want to talk to me to start with. Eventually they relented and put their hands up and said Sorry, we’ve only had one weeks training and we only get 20 mins with the claimant.

They know NOTHING about Housing whatsoever, yet UC are letting them be the ones responsible for this tenants home.

I had possibly wrongly put tenant 8 weeks in arrears on my/his rent proof letter. Job centre staff HAD TO PUT NO ARREARS down as it wasn’t the UC’s magic 2 months they require. I said so for the sake of 0.3 of a week, £50, you are now going to make this tenant homeless?

I said look at him, do you want to trust him with some £1,000’s that is supposed to be paying for a home? He’s itching to get that money to go to pub. Tenant agreed, I’ve told you I don’t want the money. Yet you are still trying to pay me.

I said to the staff: “when you saw this arrears was missing the magic 2 months by 0.3 of a week, did you not think of ringing me to play safe?” They were dumbfounded. What is the worst case that could happen if you pay Landlord direct? Oh yes, the Landlord gets paid and the tenant doesn’t become homeless. Der.

Local job centre (by this time, I have quite a few staff round including the main manager responsible for implementing UC in there) ARE NOT PUTTING EXPLICIT CONSENT on claimants form. They said we don’t know how to do it. So these flyers coming from UC on explicit consent are not filtering down to staff on the ground.

She says the tenant can do it online. He’s already told you he can’t use the internet – Where is his Welfare Safety net?

I said you ruddy scan it and put on system and then you input some details manually.

They said they gonna’ be asking their trainers how to do these things. They opened up and said we are really sorry. They had just received one of my complaints emails from UC about them not putting explicit consent on. I said every time you do wrong, I’m complaining and to ICE.

Get it right to start with, because dozens of my tenants are gonna’ be coming down soon and do you want half of Nottingham homeless?

Little old me who don’t work for UC should not be telling Job centres how to implement UC.

Neil Couling & Esther Mcvey have not got a clue what’s happening on the ground and that Alok Sharma doesn’t even know what the word homeless or hungry means!



Comments

Paul Shears

11:08 AM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

Reference Professor Jordan Peterson of Toronto University:
Anyone with an IQ below 83 simply cannot independently function in a first world country irrespective of how much training they are given.
Such people are a net burden when employed.
That is why the American military, an organisation who clearly will always have a permanent recruitment problem, will not accept them. Professor Jordan goes on to say that such people are three times more likely to die in service than those of higher ability and it is actually illegal for the American military to employ them at all.
Such people form 10% of the population.
In other words, in a first world country, 10% of the population should simply not be employed at all no matter how decent those people are.
How they then survive is a completely separate matter but one which needs to be faced without this self destructive denial due to "sensitivities".
I doubt if many of the UC staff hierarchy have an IQ above 83.

David Price

11:39 AM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by Paul Shears at 12/11/2018 - 11:08
These ten percent should be given a minimum wage income with no conditions and not forced to job seek for a position which they will never be offered.

Clint

11:42 AM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

UC is an absolute disaster. I housed people on HB since 2004 and it all worked out very well. With UC since it was introduced about 2 years ago in the Croydon area, I have lost approximately £47,000 with 10 tenants and immediately after this post, I will be writing to the appropriate "Group Development Manager" with respect to 3 tenants in order to ensure that their payments are either frozen or payments are made to me. With a lot of luck this may work without further loses.I have already filled in UC47 forms for these three tenants.

A further point is that when a tenant leaves, one has to be very lucky to get the final payment as it is paid after the tenant has left. I have lost the final payments with 3 tenants so far.
At the very least, direct payments to landlords should be allowed right at the start of the tenancy.

I used to take benefit tenants without a guarantor with one month's deposit and one month's rent in advance on the basis that the rent was paid directly to me and it all worked out very well. From last month, I have started taking benefit tenants only on the basis that they have a suitable guarantor or pay three month's rent in advance (Not easy for someone on benefits) but a few do manage.

UC is the benefit system that should be abolished as it is disaster, disaster, disaster in every way.

Annie Landlord

11:53 AM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

Its crazy Mick. You set out the problems so clearly, but the government would prefer to vilify private landlords when they are forced to evict. All the news outlets today are covering the story of the huge increase in rent arrears for social housing tenants who have transferred to UC. One interview focused on a tenant in Flintshire, £4K in arrears and facing eviction. I wonder if the government, councils, Shelter, CA, will criticise the councils and housing associations who are threatening to evict tenants who don't pay their rent?

John Frith

11:58 AM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

I have yet to experience UC problems, but know it's only a matter of time. Talked to an agent last Friday, who is regularly experiencing overwhelming problems, who told me that word is getting around that there is easy money to be made by tenants moving in to a property and claiming UC. Their expectation is that after about 3 months they will get 3 months backdated housing allowance, which they know that they can pocket. They then move into a new house with a new unsuspecting landlord, and start the UC claim again to repeat the process.

Clint

12:08 PM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by John Frith at 12/11/2018 - 11:58
I always ensure that any of my tenants that have not paid UC get a CCJ in order to make it difficult for them to get accommodation elsewhere. This I do, even if I know that I am not going to get the money knowing that I am only spending more on the unruly tenant

Old Mrs Landlord

12:08 PM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by Paul Shears at 12/11/2018 - 11:08
Those figures are astonshing. 10% of the population! Thinking about it, I suppose in years gone by there were plenty of purely manual repetitive jobs such as digging holes in the road or stacking supermarket shelves which such people could learn to perform efficiently. Nowadays these have all disappeared or at the least involve an element of IT competency beyond the capability of people with such low IQs so I suppose the rest of the population just has to carry them. These people, of course, are the very ones most likely to be claiming benefits, which makes it all the more imperative to design a system of delivery which caters to their capabilities.

Paul Shears

12:24 PM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by David Price at 12/11/2018 - 11:39
Sadly, the evidence which has been repeatedly verified, speaks for itself.
You are absolutely right.
This does not, of course, mean that many of these people are not thoroughly decent human beings who cannot have some place in society. But it simply cannot involve any attempt at productive employment.
Further, I do not see how such people can productively take any part in steering the country via a voting system.
I am unaware of anyone who understands much of how this country works and few that appear to understand some pretty basic matters.
Of course, it may be myself that has missed something. For obvious reasons, I would sincerely love to be shown reason and evidence that is the case.

Paul Shears

12:26 PM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by Old Mrs Landlord at 12/11/2018 - 12:08
It is with great sadness that I have to totally agree with you.

David Price

12:27 PM, 12th November 2018
About a month ago

Mick you are lucky to get to speak to the staff in the Job Centre. My team have been banned from entering the Job Centre and when one of them tried to get in to assist a claimant five security guards barred his entry and the police were called. Universal Credit is a Universal Disgrace.
Panorama has a programme on UC at 19:30 this evening which may be interesting.

1 2

Leave Comments

Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.

Forgotten your password?

OR

BECOME A MEMBER

Variation of lease to rectify adverse possession?

The Landlords Union

Become a Member, it's FREE

Our mission is to facilitate the sharing of best practice amongst UK landlords, tenants and letting agents

Learn More