9:34 AM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago 17
Text Size
Categories:
By not fully understanding a problem, the risk of putting in a bad fix is magnified. We are seeing example after example of people acting without a full understanding..
I learned lessons early as a landlord that a failure to understand likely meant bigger expenses. For me, a leak below a ground floor front bay window taught me a lot. I had professionals in who told me the bay roof was the problem, so I replaced the bay roof, but the leak remained.
Whilst this cost me time and money, the professionals took no responsibility. After proper diagnosis, testing myself I found the water ingress was at the chimney some 10 metres away. I realised I had wasted money replacing something because I had not understood the real problem. The professionals didn’t identify the real issue and there were no consequences for them. For me and my tenants, there was a cost. The leak went on and I paid for a second fix
I learned a lot from that to ensure I fully understand an issue before accepting what I am told or jumping in with an ill-considered fix.
What saddens me is this common-sense approach eludes people and authorities who act on incomplete evidence, then enforce flawed policy on others. The people who came up with legislation for Awaab’s law based this on a tragic case where the cause of the mould had shockingly NEVER been determined. The ombudsman wrote it wasn’t lifestyle from a point of ignorance; the truth is he didn’t know what the cause was as nobody found out. To me, it seems unacceptable that we are governed by policy that is put in place based on incomplete or ignorant assumptions.
The Renters’ Rights Bill will perhaps have the biggest non intended impact as the stakes for a landlord selecting a bad tenant will be even more punitive.
Landlords will rightly be very careful about who they provide a home to. Whilst many people have mortgages to provide a home, the banks won’t lend to millions of other people. The banks effectively discriminate against this group, yet these people still need homes. With the government failing to provide sufficient social housing, private landlords who the banks deem a better risk are able to step in and undertake the management of the same people the banks refuse to deal with.
The tighter reform regulation will increase risk and costs for landlords, such that taking a bad tenant is hugely costly. To ensure they protect their investments as best as they can landlords will be more diligent in tenant selection. This means people who can’t demonstrate they are good tenants will be rejected and end up without private housing provision in a market of declining private housing.
The tears cried by the chancellor are nothing compared to vulnerable people who will find themselves in dire circumstances and homeless because fewer landlords are willing or able to take the mounting pressures.
The policy is being written without answering a fundamental question. Why are people evicted with a no-fault eviction? Nobody bothered to find out? The clues were there that around 1 in 200 tenancies end in a court eviction – then this doesn’t seem unduly high and we don’t know the reasons the landlords took this drastic and costly step. They didn’t do the right research?
If the problem was people are asked to move before they want to, then the solution was to offer longer tenancies? If the problem was rent rises, then there was already a policy in place where tenants could challenge. So, what problem is the Renters’ Rights Bill addressing?
Forcing obstinate policy on people when a problem isn’t properly understood can only lead to inefficiency, higher costs and likely in this case the most vulnerable being badly impacted.
It’s not rocket science, but rocket scientists have to fully understand and diagnose the problem to find a workable solution. It appears people involved in implementing and changing policy do so on emotion and incomplete evidence, and this shortfall leads to degradation and inefficiency.
The evidence, similar to the leak that continued from my chimney, will be obvious as costs rise and vulnerable people struggle to find private accommodation. However, under the current system, those responsible will remain unaccountable with real opportunities missed and benefits lost.
A proper understanding is always worth the effort!
What do others think what problem is the Renters’ Rights Bill addressing?
Thanks,
Paul
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
House prices steady in June with improving market activity - HalifaxNext Article
Industry body pushes back on pet insurance U-turn
Monty Bodkin
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 1549
10:29 AM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
“To ensure they protect their investments as best as they can landlords will be more diligent in tenant selection. This means people who can’t demonstrate they are good tenants will be rejected”
30 rental enquiries for a property so far, all rejected as below A1. Previously I’d have given at least a third of them a chance but can’t take the risk anymore.
Monty Bodkin
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 1549
10:42 AM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
“Why are people evicted with a no-fault eviction?”
1. Rent arrears.
2. Anti social Behaviour (near impossible to evict using section 8)
3. Landlord selling
The ‘theory’ that landlords evict on a whim is nonsense.
Reluctant Landlord
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3452 - Articles: 5
10:45 AM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
The RRB is only pandering to what the party in power sees as a political win and therefore a vote gain. They are trading off tenant naivety and focussing on apparent immediate ‘tenant gains’ only.
Tell people that rent the reason why your rents are high is because of evil landlords creaming profit, and of course they will believe it. They see it as money going our of their salary into purely into the pocket of another.
Tell the people the government will bring in laws to stop all ‘rogue’ landlords, make properties more efficient to reduce energy bills, make rent repayments easier, and stop rent increases, ban evictions, allow you a pet etc – and of course this is appealing.
It’s what they want to hear.
Its not about the effect of all of this on the rental sector – the further rise in costs to make this all happen. Its not what Mr/Ms T is concerned about overall – its what it means to them today and now. It’s what has been promised – and the government shall deliver!
The phrase – turkeys voting for Xmas has never been more true….
Rod
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since August 2021 - Comments: 305 - Articles: 1
10:48 AM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
It has been truly astonishing to see how few amendments the Government has accepted as the RRB passes through its third reading in the Lords (the second and third sessions are today, 7 July, and next week on 15 July).
The team at iHowz were in the Lords lobbying for landlords next week.
Why not come and see us at the London NLIS show this week.
https://www.landlordinvestmentshow.co.uk/9-july-london
In addition to getting to meet the team and hear about the various changes landlords face, you can take advantage of our special show deal on membership.
Can’t make it?
Why not see why our members say we’re the friendliest landlord association?
https://ihowz.uk/
Gromit
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1012
11:02 AM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 07/07/2025 – 10:45
Spot on.
The RRB is only about vote winning headlines not about actually solving any problems.
Judith Wordsworth
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1398
11:47 AM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
I believe it was a vote enticement for generally the under 35’s including students by ALL political parties at the last General Election and the previous one and to appease Shelter, Generation Rent et AL.
Both the Renters Reform Bill and the Renters Rights Bill have been badly drafted and some sections unworkable. That is down to the drafters but the fault of the Ministers for not thinking through or understanding what is needed and how to go about it before giving it to those that draft. And the fault of Government not to have read with a fine toothcomb line by line and understand the implications.
Also
Common Sense has mostly been bred out.
In mho too many PRS landlords do not know, or understand, their legal responsibilities, obligations, the regulations and legislation eg Landlord & Tenant, Fire Safety, Environmental etc etc BEFORE becoming landlords.
The PRS is a business.
This can honestly only lead to more legislation and regulation which affects all PRS landlords.
Relying on organisations like NRLA/Pims.co.uk/iHowz/Landlord Zone/et Al after becoming a PRS Landlord, usually when the sh*t has hit your fan, is too little too late. They too are, in the main, business there to make a profit.
Some PRS landlords say they are “accidental” landlords. No-one is as every landlord has made a conscious decision to be one. Whether inheriting a property, moving in with a partner and renting out the other’s property, entered via BTL. It was a choice.
5. The causes of the mould are many, but generally if properties are in decent/good repair it is down to tenant “lifestyle” even Michael Gove admitted that. ie lack of ventilation eg don’t open or refuse to open windows/tape up passive air vents & window trickle vents/place furniture right up to outside walls/drying washing on indoor lines or racks or on radiators etc etc; lack of adequate heating on in autumn, spring and winter months whether due to can’t afford or any other reasons; “not my [tenants] job to wipe off” condensation on windows/tiles around shower area/silicone around baths and basins or to use a proprietary mould remover spray at first sign of mould.
While it IS their home they don’t own the bricks and mortar so many don’t care and will care even less if legislation says landlords HAVE to sort it.
Not just vulnerable people will find themselves in dire circumstances and homeless because fewer landlords are willing or able to the risk and fewer rental properties out their as PRS landlords sell. My Local Authority started bulk buying in tents in 2023! One London Borough has evicted tenants from their Council Homes so that the Council can house homeless people!
I’m also very concerned that PRS Landlords will need to put on the data base register not only their personal home address even if using a letting agent, but how many evictions they have sought.
What business is of the general public to know who is a PRS landlord, their home address and how many evictions they have sought.
Paul Essex
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 718
13:12 PM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
I suspect that the continued assault on the PRS, second home owners and Airbnb is more about pretending that the homeless crisis is down to everything except the real cause of too many people.
Hugh Baily
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since August 2023 - Comments: 27
13:31 PM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
I believe it addresses the political problem that successive governments have failed to ensure enough of the right type of housing was built.Such action would have created competition which would have solved most of the problems they will try to solve unsuccessfully with this bill. Housing is a very fraught and sensitive issue. By blaming the PRS our politicians divert attention from their failings. It is plain that the government is trying to get students into PBSA but of course there isn’t the available accommodation.I am aware that this sounds very extreme but can anyone really offer a more credible answer?.
Reluctant Landlord
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3452 - Articles: 5
15:22 PM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 07/07/2025 – 11:47
well if I am forced to put down the number of evictions SOUGHT and where possession had to be gained, then so be it. Each will come with a full explanation too.
Every single S21 I have ever issued has been for either rent arrears or breaches in tenancy (damage/asbo) for which there is clear evidence.
If that puts off a tenant applying for accommodation in any of my rentals – fine with me. If anything it shows I am fair, but take no sh*t.
Tenants have obligations as per tenancy agreement and if they don’t uphold these, then I will pursue this. They are responsible for their own actions!
Northernpleb
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since November 2019 - Comments: 143
16:24 PM, 7th July 2025, About 7 months ago
I am not sure what the problem was which the Renters Reform/Rights Bill is supposed to solve.
The Private Rental Sector was very successful under Legislation bought on by Thatcher. Private Rental went from 5% to 40%.
Then Osbourne Started with Section 24. Then Gove jumped in with wholesale Selective Licences. and more regulation I think 450 approximately.
Results so far Nothing to Rent. and Higher Rents .
Labour solution more of the same but finish Private Landlords off with Taxes and fines for good.
Within 5 years I believe there will be 30 to 40% fewer private rental homes. And Gradually it will go back to pre Thatcher .
The only help of salvation for Landlords and Tenants are if Reform are voted in and they do what they say .