This is a Joke – Judges rule EPC served?Make Text Bigger
I have severed a section 21 on a tenant for a pre 2015 AST. The EPC was sent to the tenant 18 months prior but not signed for. However, the tenant denies receiving the EPC.
Two district Judges have independently determined on probability the EPC was severed and issued a possession order. The tenant’s solicitor has requested another appeal. This is a joke.
I thought there was a high court ruling that it can be simply corrected by serving before the section 21 in any event, but I can’t find anything on this.
Can anyone point me in the right direction, so we can stop arguing about semantics and get this done?
Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.