This is a Joke – Judges rule EPC served?
I have severed a section 21 on a tenant for a pre 2015 AST. The EPC was sent to the tenant 18 months prior but not signed for. However, the tenant denies receiving the EPC.
Two district Judges have independently determined on probability the EPC was severed and issued a possession order. The tenant’s solicitor has requested another appeal. This is a joke.
I thought there was a high court ruling that it can be simply corrected by serving before the section 21 in any event, but I can’t find anything on this.
Can anyone point me in the right direction, so we can stop arguing about semantics and get this done?
Many thanks
Michael
22 comments on this article
Learn from your peers’ experience
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Member Since October 2011 - Comments: 148
11:38 AM, 26th August 2020, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Hamish McBloggs at 26/08/2020 – 11:24
sounds perfect to me – I’m doing my best to get as close to that as possible. Is Box.com free (and I too have filmed myself posting letters – into post boxes and through doors)
Member Since March 2016 - Comments: 254
12:45 PM, 27th August 2020, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Denise G at 26/08/2020 – 11:38
DG,
Like all of the ones I have come across Box is free for personal use.
One is supposed to pay for business use.
bfn