This is a Joke – Judges rule EPC served?

by Readers Question

15:54 PM, 18th August 2020
About 2 months ago

This is a Joke – Judges rule EPC served?

Make Text Bigger
This is a Joke – Judges rule EPC served?

I have severed a section 21 on a tenant for a pre 2015 AST. The EPC was sent to the tenant 18 months prior but not signed for. However, the tenant denies receiving the EPC.

Two district Judges have independently determined on probability the EPC was severed and issued a possession order. The tenant’s solicitor has requested another appeal. This is a joke.

I thought there was a high court ruling that it can be simply corrected by serving before the section 21 in any event, but I can’t find anything on this.

Can anyone point me in the right direction, so we can stop arguing about semantics and get this done?

Many thanks

Michael


Share this article

Twitter Facebook LinkedIn

Comments

Denise G

11:38 AM, 26th August 2020
About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Hamish McBloggs at 26/08/2020 - 11:24
sounds perfect to me - I'm doing my best to get as close to that as possible. Is Box.com free (and I too have filmed myself posting letters - into post boxes and through doors)

Hamish McBloggs

12:45 PM, 27th August 2020
About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Denise G at 26/08/2020 - 11:38
DG,

Like all of the ones I have come across Box is free for personal use.

One is supposed to pay for business use.

bfn

1 2 3

Leave Comments

Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.

Forgotten your password?

OR

BECOME A MEMBER

Landlords and tenants should make contingency plans together for winter

The Landlords Union

Become a Member, it's FREE

Our mission is to facilitate the sharing of best practice amongst UK landlords, tenants and letting agents

Learn More