9:30 AM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago 20
Text Size
Categories:
“We have received evidence that civil penalties are not strong enough to deter landlords who are prepared to commit the most serious offences, and fines issued through the courts are often insufficient to make prosecutions worthwhile. We believe local authorities should have the power to levy more substantial fines, which might stand a chance of breaking the business models of the worst offenders. Further, local authorities should have the power to confiscate properties from those landlords committing the most egregious offences and whose business model relies on the exploitation of vulnerable tenants. Coupled with the banning orders which came into force in April, this would act as a more powerful deterrent than the existing provisions.”
The above is a quote from the The Housing Communities and Local Government Committee’s 4th report. Click here to read the full report.
However, the report does state that the vast majority of private rented tenants are satisfied with the quality of their homes.
The report focuses on the bottom end of the market where 800,000 PRS homes have a category 1 hazard eg. mould, faulty wiring and gas appliances etc. Within this sector the select committee report made up of Tory and Opposition MPs said: “There is a clear power imbalance in parts of the sector, with tenants often unwilling to complain to landlords about the conditions in their homes for fear of retaliation. Consumer rights are meaningless without the ability to use them in practice.”
Conclusions and Recommendations of the report:
RLA’s Chair, Alan Ward, said:
“Tenants and good landlords are being let down by local authorities unable to properly enforce the powers they already have. Whilst the MPs call for greater powers to protect tenants when they raise complaints about standards in a property, the reality is that these protections already exist.
“The problem is that over stretched councils simply do not have the resources to properly use such powers to protect tenants from the minority of landlords who are criminals and have no place in the sector.
“It is vital also that ministers adopt the committee’s recommendation for the speedy establishment of a new housing court. At present the courts are not fit for purpose when seeking to uphold tenant and landlord rights.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
CGT minimisation on family inherited property?Next Article
Limited Co. proxy agreement?
Dr Rosalind Beck
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2016 - Comments: 2533 - Articles: 73
10:22 AM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
Of course the Government is already confiscating properties in effect via Section 24. Equity landlords have will be confiscated via tax bills – and this isn’t confiscation of rogue landlords’ property but rather across the board. We need a bit more carrot and less stick. Policies aimed at huge fines etc are getting ridiculous now. Hopefully the frenzy against landlords will abate soon as it’s out of control.
The_Maluka
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2074 - Articles: 1
10:39 AM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Dr Rosalind Beck at 19/04/2018 – 10:22
In the current vitriolic environment Landlords should be thankful that the death penalty has been abolished.
John MacAlevey
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 134
11:04 AM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
Hi HMG & locals authorities around the UK!
Good luck with the housing crisis that has been caused by you both..!
Sorry private landlords..it`s all your fault…as civil servants we have to find somebody else responsible for the problem.
terry sullivan
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since December 2015 - Comments: 828
11:31 AM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
most mould is down to regulations requiring inadequate ventilation and double glazing
Dr Rosalind Beck
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2016 - Comments: 2533 - Articles: 73
11:38 AM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
Reply to the comment left by terry sullivan at 19/04/2018 – 11:31
Yes, it’s a catch 22. They make us do stuff which then causes problems. Same principle with s24 – they make us push up rents through outrageous taxation and then demand rent controls.
Chris @ Possession Friend
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2016 - Comments: 1552 - Articles: 15
12:11 PM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
MCHLG don’t know what’s going on – or applicable to the Housing market. ! They haven’t long brought in £30 k PER Breach ! Civil penalties. !!,
Faulty window, loose carpet and Locks not compliant with BS Standards, that’s £90 k Mr Landlord – but now we want to re-possess your £350 k property. Are these REAL people dreaming this stuff up ?
In any event if £30 k wasn’t enough such as Criminal Landlord, Overcrowding, as in Brent Council v Shah & others, unreported Harrow 2018, The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 has been used. – so even this seems ‘Not enough’
They acknowledge that measures they’ve introduced aren’t being implemented – so WHAT are MHCLG doing about that – nothing !
Continue blaming Landlords for what is in effect, a shocking lack of Management and Leadership of L.A’s by themselves ( not aided by the abolition of LACORS )
Savage Javid needs to take some accountability. ! – and implement the existing legislation.
John Curtis
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 31
12:34 PM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
This is just another nail in the coffin.
I have decided to dispose of my property portfolio.
I have a block of 9 flats under construction and 9 more tenanted.
I have now had enough and will follow Marks lead and leave this land to all the non-participants who demand everything for nothing and are entitled to their rights with no effort from themselves.
Enough is enough.
Old Mrs Landlord
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since February 2016 - Comments: 1056
13:17 PM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Chris Daniel at 19/04/2018 – 12:11The exmple you give of non-compliant locks is a difficult one to avoid given that tenants have the right to change locks without landlords’ permission or knowledge. Problems are also caused when tenants object to thumbturn locks as their young children can let themselves out without the parent being aware, an issue raised by Mick of Nottingham (surname slipped my mind). As with tenants who refuse entry for gas cert. inspections, we are being placed in positions where it is impossible to comply with contradictory rules and are damned whichever course of action we take. No wonder so many are deciding enough is enough but this is just too much.
terry sullivan
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since December 2015 - Comments: 828
13:20 PM, 19th April 2018, About 8 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Chris Daniel at 19/04/2018 – 12:11
javid is clueless–i think cs are running rings round him!
Mick Roberts
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3187 - Articles: 79
16:44 PM, 20th April 2018, About 8 years ago
Keep making it harder for us.
Makes rents go up which is harder for tenants and it’s a spiralling circle.
Make it easy within laws of course and rents won’t be as dear and more competition too which means more choice for tenants.
We getting blamed on the supply issue. No one else is was buying certain properties, so we housed someone when the Govt and Council didn’t.