13:11 PM, 15th September 2020, About 3 years ago 13
The current ban on repossessions in the residential rental market in England and Wales is due to end on Sunday 20th This follows a U-turn on the 21st August which saw the Government extend the ban by a further month in chaotic, last-minute circumstances. At the time the Master of the Rolls described the nature and timing of the extension as “extremely unusual”.
By the 20th September, it will have been six months in which landlords have been unable to:
Given the above the courts need to open again to begin to hear the most urgent cases under the new rules which will provide protections for tenants affected by COVID-19 as outlined below. Ministers have said that this will happen when the current stay on repossession ends, but it is essential that they do not renege on this commitment as happened in August.
Protections for Tenants Affected by COVID-19
When the courts start hearing claims for repossession again, a landlord with a claim already in progress will have to provide a ‘re-activation notice’ informing the court (and the tenant) in writing. If they don’t, the case will remain dormant.
Where these, or a new claim, include non-payment of rent, the landlord has to set out what knowledge they have about the tenant’s circumstances including the effect of the coronavirus pandemic on them and their dependants.
If this information is not forthcoming or is deemed inadequate by the courts, the judges will have powers to adjourn the case. Such a delay would mean that the landlord may continue to receive no rent from the tenant and so this will hit them in the pocket. This will encourage landlords to engage with their tenants prior to court action including seeking ways to sustain tenancies using the NRLA’s rent arrears management guidance.
The courts will prioritise cases involving extreme arrears built before the lockdown, anti-social behaviour and domestic violence. Those that are not a priority case will take longer, offering further time for alternative accommodation to be sought and providing further incentive for landlords to seek agreement outside of the courts.
Alongside this, the Government has introduced rules which mean that in most cases landlords will be required to provide six months’ notice to a tenant where they want to repossess a property. This will include all Section 21 (no explanation) repossessions. The exemptions will be the following situations:
Problem Still to be Addressed
Those who rent their own homes out whilst working elsewhere, such as those in the military, will continue to need to give six months’ notice to access their homes, effectively locking them out of their own property. The NRLA is calling on the Government to address this anomaly.
Chris Norris, Policy Director for the National Residential Landlords Association, said:
“The Government needs to keep its word and ensure that urgent repossession cases can be heard again after the 20th September.
“We need the courts to deal with cases where tenants are committing anti-social behaviour or where there are long-standing rent arrears that have nothing to do with the pandemic. Over the last six months landlords have been powerless to take any action against those who cause misery for fellow tenants and neighbours. This has to end.”
Colin is a private sector tenant who has spoken to the NRLA about the anti-social behaviour he and his partner have faced at the hands of tenants living in the flat above him. He has been required to shield due to a condition whereby his immune system attacks itself.
He has spoken of the tenants above him playing loud music, singing, swearing and banging the floor late at night. When Colin has asked them to turn the music down they began to bang on and spit at his windows.
He spoke in June of being horrified at the prospect of the repossession ban being extended and the landlord being unable to take any action against his neighbours. All the police told Colin was to move out for a few days to see if the behaviour settled.
Phil Young retired from his job as an IT director last year due to ill health as he is recovering from cancer.
He became a landlord to help to boost his income when he retired and took over as the landlord of three flats in February this year. One tenant was inherited from the previous landlord of the property.
Despite the tenant continuing to receive Universal Credit during the pandemic and having not been affected financially by the coronavirus, Phil says between February and July, the tenant did not pay anything in rent, and has now built £3,500 in rent arrears.
Phil met with the tenant to discuss the arrears, and they came up with an agreed payment plan. At that point, he had felt hopeful that the tenant would stick to the plan, having not heard anything from them to suggest they would not.
When the time came for the tenant to pay the agreed rent, they again did not pay and gave no reason why. Phil served notice on the tenant in May as communication had stopped, and despite his best efforts to come to an agreement this was ignored.
Phil did try to arrange for direct payments of Universal Credit to be made to him, but he says the tenant refused permission for this to happen, stating that they would be moving out of the property in July. This did not happen, and the tenant continued to live at the property not paying rent.
Phil has since been able to get one payment of Universal Credit for August’s rent, but is still owed thousands of pounds and says he doesn’t know if this will ever be paid back to him.
Applying for a buy-to-let mortgage holiday is not an option as the flat is in a commercial block. Phil says he relies on receiving the income for his own livelihood. He says he is “not wealthy, I am a first time landlord trying to make a meagre living” and that he feels that landlords have “all been tarnished with the same brush”. He worries it could be well into next year before he is able to gain possession of the property due to the repossessions ban.
Emma Burton, her husband and children are now trapped in France, living with Emma’s parents, as a result of being unable to reclaim possession of their home which they rented out whilst working abroad in 2019.
The tenant stopped paying the rent in December 2019. They have a four year old son who has a rare metabolic disorder and needs medication and a special diet. As non-residents they can’t get this from the French health system.
They cannot regain possession of their property until at least December before the courts see it as a priority case and in reality it is likely to be several months after that.
13:24 PM, 15th September 2020, About 3 years ago
Bets on a Friday announcement for a further delay until March, anyone...?
Mind you, they can 'officially' 'open' the Courts, but cases will proceed at *their* pace, thereby avoiding any backlash from another delay, but realistically speaking not actually risk any tenants being evicted (certainly not in any kind of volume) until next year anyway.
14:08 PM, 15th September 2020, About 3 years ago
the whole thing is a farce. The Courts should have assessed cases on a priority basis as soon as lockdown was announced to stop dead in its tracks the inevitability of a build up of cases. This has made a mockery of of the 'justice' system for landlords.
Everyone seems to be forgetting here... LL's would not be looking for legal redress UNLESS it is warranted. Why would anyone pay for a legal process to be started if there were another way of resolution beforehand?
It is abhorrent that the state can look to stomping on the heads of private individuals and stopping them taking possession back of their own properties when a tenant fails on their part of the contract by not paying the rent due.
It should have gone the other way - they courts should have decreed that if the tenant cannot show just reason why they are in arrears then they face an automatic eviction order. That would focus the minds of some to comply, and if it didn't then these are exactly the people that would have inevitably been evicted anyway. Backlog - what backlog? 😉
Chris @ Possession Friend
10:02 AM, 16th September 2020, About 3 years ago
The ' new ' MHCLG plan is to have Legal Aid solicitors use their ' professional ' judgement which means referring all cases for mediation that will severely delay and keep rent-defaulting tenants in the rented property even longer.
10:13 AM, 16th September 2020, About 3 years ago
Coronovirus isn't over yet. if there are any more legal delays isn't this just sequestration of property by the back door.? There will be a glut of evictions due to the backlog and this won't be allowed if the virus is still around.
10:38 AM, 16th September 2020, About 3 years ago
I have no confidence whatsoever that I will see my property at any any point this year. The government is clearly completely happy to break the law, so stopping families that rent out properties for a living from having any justice is not going to bother them at all.
18:03 PM, 16th September 2020, About 3 years ago
Are we not humans? we don't have any rights? I quote from the top
"Where these, or a new claim, include non-payment of rent, the landlord has to set out what knowledge they have about the tenant’s circumstances including the effect of the coronavirus pandemic on them and their dependents."
what the hell! what about the impact of corona virus on landlords and our dependents?
what a load of trash
And the Mayor of London is seeking permission from the Government to freeze rents, yet he has the audacity to pump up the congestion charges in the middle of pandemic when many people have lost jobs, their earnings impacted heavily, from which planet is he from, never trust a bus drivers son again to be a mayor.
10:22 AM, 17th September 2020, About 3 years ago
In the reactivation notice where it asks '.... the landlord has to set out what knowledge they have about the tenant’s circumstances including the effect of the coronavirus pandemic on them and their dependents." , I have asked my solicitor to state a simple 'None' (as it does not actually ask for evidence), then list the DIRECT effects it has on the Landlord instead. Bloody cheek for the Courts event to be asking the question in the first place of the CLAIMANT! Where else in the world would you ask the person taking another to court to state what excuses you can offer to assist the DEFENDANT???? OMG
11:07 AM, 17th September 2020, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by WP at 17/09/2020 - 10:22As unfair as it is, I’d fully expect to have your case adjourned until it *can* be established what/if there’s been any impact on the tenant or until you can demonstrate you’ve taken reasonable steps to find out (as per the reactivation notice wording). They will be looking for any and every reason to adjourn/cancel the application, so don’t give them chance. Just send an email/text/letter to the tenant that you know will very likely go unanswered. Having said that, as Giles Peaker points out on his Nearly Legal blog, “… taking steps to find out is not required by PD 55C. Hence ‘you could consider’ [taking reasonable steps to find out (“…the effect of the Coronavirus pandemic on the Defendant and their dependants.”) before using this Notice].”
Chris @ Possession Friend
11:32 AM, 17th September 2020, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by WP at 17/09/2020 - 10:22
Be prepared for your case to be adjourned. I agree with your sentiments but not playing by the court rules ( however unfair ) does not speed up your case, quite the opposite.
21:53 PM, 17th September 2020, About 3 years ago
I think we should have a platform to gather all the cases during pandemic , and see what 's impact on LL and same time these rough tenants enjoy over year rent free.