3 years ago | 37 comments
Hello, We have an awkward freeloader who’s stopped paying. If it takes 6-12 months to evict him we will have a lot of unpaid rent (Yes, we can sue, but CCJ’s may go nowhere with a “paper” debtor), plus legal/court fees, plus whatever state he leaves our property in.
It might be worth considering paying him to just go.
Has anyone got experience of having done that?
What are the rights and wrongs, the pros and cons, how do we arrive at a sum, and how might it work – we can’t pay till he’s physically out, would it be a transaction between solicitors?
If he stands to “gain” by a long rent free period I guess it would be a few £thousand.
It sticks in the craw but it’s got to be worth considering.
Thank you,
Grahame
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Inventories provide landlords with a 'last line of defence'
3 years ago | 37 comments
3 years ago | 10 comments
3 years ago | 12 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 71
4:03 PM, 16th November 2022, About 3 years ago
What does RRO means?
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
4:38 PM, 16th November 2022, About 3 years ago
My tenant stopped paying at the start of lockdown. He was earning good money, but was simply feckless! He knew I couldn’t evict him, and also played every card he could; covid, mental health… He said he wasn’t receiving housing benefit, but was. After 5 months, I offered to clear his debt if he left immediately without damage. He didn’t even acknowledge my offer, which was reiterated by my agent when they served the S8. Still nothing. It took 16 months to get my possession and payment order, and I doubt if it will be any quicker today. He finally left, but as he was self-employed, he had no employer I could to for an attachment. I could have obtained a CCJ, but I wouldn’t have got anything. I just needed to move on, and sold up ASAP.
Today, there is very little availability out there, and rents have increased. I can’t see why he would want to move. The danger is S21 will be ended and another eviction ban will be announced. My advice is issue a S21 immediately [with a view to selling!].
Member Since January 2019 - Comments: 24
4:57 PM, 16th November 2022, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Jerry Stone at 16/11/2022 – 16:03
Rent repayment order.
Member Since May 2016 - Comments: 1570 - Articles: 16
5:07 PM, 16th November 2022, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Jerry Stone at 16/11/2022 – 16:03
Jerry,
Take it from those that know, – you’ll be glad you don’t know what an RRO is đŸ˜‰
( a Years free – refunded rent, basically )
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 71
5:09 PM, 16th November 2022, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Fiona at 16/11/2022 – 16:57
Thank you.
Interesting, every day is a school day. I was not aware of that legislation but then I don’t deal with HMO’s.
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1147
5:48 PM, 16th November 2022, About 3 years ago
I’ve paid a tenant to leave. You have to be careful of a few things:
1. Try to get them to broach the subject first, but if not, raise it carefully and obliquely. Keep it vague and theoretical. You don’t want to be accused of harassment.
2. You need a witness to the deed of surrender, which is signed when they’ve exited the front door with their bags. I used the witness as a go between to hold the cash, the document and the keys and to swap them once everything was done.
3. The amount will depend on the details of the case – the rent amount; how long they could remain not paying it; how realistic a threat to sue them for every penny would be really etc.
Member Since October 2019 - Comments: 394
9:57 PM, 16th November 2022, About 3 years ago
RRO = rent repayment order? Take a look at the Shelter’ site – the offer of money can be taken as a form of harassment !
Member Since December 2021 - Comments: 161
10:41 AM, 17th November 2022, About 3 years ago
No, you must not pay them off, it is so unprofessional to do so.
Serve a Section 8 and go through the process. Paying them off doesn’t prevent them doing it again to another Landlord and there is a good chance it makes you a bigger target for the next fraudster.
If the tenant asks for it, it is essentially extortion or blackmail and would be a criminal offence under the Theft Act.
Get a CCJ against them for the debt and continue to pursue them for ever more. Make it clear from the outset that you intend to do this and they might just back off.
All those that say they can’t afford the mortgage ‘cos the rent isn’t getting paid, or you just don’t want the hassle, well you probably shouldn’t be landlords in the first place. This is an every day risk for landlords and it should be tackled in a professional and legal manner
Member Since April 2017 - Comments: 163 - Articles: 1
11:07 AM, 17th November 2022, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Smiffy at 17/11/2022 – 10:41Gosh, how i disagree with Smiffy, serving section 8. We did once, but it took 4 months to get to court hearing. We won the court hearing, and the court said the tenant had to be out within 2 weeks. The tenant had not been present, then it took 2 months for the court to write to the tenant telling they had to be out within the 2 weeks… Luckily i persuaded the tenant to leave in the 2 weeks but we lost 2 years rent. Lesson learnt WE DO NOT HAVE A COURT EVICTION SYSTEM FIT FOR PURPOSE. So find another route. Anything. Pay them to go.. Other times I have persuaded 3 tenants to go if I write off the rent, and has worked, the worst was 5 months rent lost. No court used. (this all represents about one tenant n 100 by the way). We do not have an eviction system in this country that works, other tenants (3 others only) I have used section 21 mutually happily
Member Since April 2017 - Comments: 163 - Articles: 1
11:12 AM, 17th November 2022, About 3 years ago
I should say the the excellent Smiffy is right in principal, but the system does not work in practice