Labour MP questions landlord role in tackling tenant anti-social behaviour

Labour MP questions landlord role in tackling tenant anti-social behaviour

Group of tenants engaging in anti-social behaviour in a residential area
8:03 AM, 29th May 2026, 4 days ago 42

A Labour MP has suggested landlords should take a greater role in tackling anti-social behaviour caused by tenants.

In a Parliamentary written question, Connor Naismith MP asked whether the government was taking steps “to make private landlords responsible for dealing with anti-social behaviour caused by their tenants”.

In response, housing minister Matthew Pennycook confirmed under the Renters’ Rights Act, landlords can evict tenants for anti-social behaviour.

Tackling anti-social behaviour is a top priority

Mr Pennycook said: “Tackling anti-social behaviour is a top priority for this government, and a key part of our Safer Streets Mission.

“We will crack down on those making neighbourhoods feel unsafe and unwelcoming by introducing the new Respect Order, which local authorities will be able to apply for, and which will carry tough sanctions and penalties for persistent adult offenders.”

He added: “The police, local authorities and social landlords may already apply for a Civil Injunction under Section 1 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 to prevent behaviour that is causing housing-related nuisance and annoyance.

“Landlords have powers to regain possession where necessary. The Renters’ Rights Act  shortened the notice period for the existing mandatory eviction ground (7A). Landlords can make a claim to the court immediately in all cases of anti-social behaviour.

“The act also ensures judges in possession cases have particular regard to whether tenants have engaged with efforts to resolve their behaviour and the impact on other tenants within HMOs.

“Under selective and HMO licensing, local authorities can also use licence conditions to require landlords to take steps to manage and deal with anti-social behaviour caused by their tenants.”

Landlords can reduce the risk of anti-social behaviour by asking for references

As previously reported by Property118, under the Renters’ Rights Act, when using a discretionary ground for possession, landlords will have to prove that anti-social behaviour has occurred, and the court will then decide whether it is reasonable to evict the tenant.

The government guidance provides examples of what counts as anti-social behaviour, covering both criminal and non-criminal behaviour, for example:

  • causing a nuisance to neighbours
  • noise
  • verbal abuse, harassment and threats
  • drug use or drug dealing
  • vandalism
  • graffiti
  • fly-tipping and littering
  • discarding syringes or needles
  • issues with pets

However, the government guidance says minor issues such as problems with bins, parking disputes, or one-off incidents do not count as anti-social behaviour.

The government guidance also claims landlords can reduce the risk of anti-social behaviour by asking for a reference from a previous landlord or letting agency.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1209

    1:32 AM, 30th May 2026, About 4 days ago

    The truth is that the burden of proof required in ASB cases and the risk of a £40k penalty for relying on a ground that you cant fully establish will mean that most landlords wont even attempt an ASB eviction.

  • Member Since May 2026 - Comments: 1

    7:18 AM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    I’m not a landlord, just someone who understands what private landlords do for the uk. The government created this problem by selling the council houses, private landlords used to provide the next level up from the council house.
    One thing that puzzed me by this, surly the government understands to give a bad reference would leave a landlord open to losing their property, one error in a bad reference and you have liable that Tennant who can then get legal aid to sue the pants off you.
    I learned in business school never to give a bad reference for an employee as it could cost you an unlimited compensation claim.
    Short of getting a solicitor to write it for you, they can check court records that you have no access to.
    What I learned was your refusal to give a reference is the way you do it.
    So checking references you’re not going to find anything bad about a Tennant, more likely you get a good reference for a bad Tennant because the previous landlord want rid of them.
    And clowncils are using private landlords as a source of funds.
    Clowncil workers i find are arrogant small people who think they can do whatever they want.
    In reality they can’t even get their own work done.

  • Member Since July 2024 - Comments: 7

    8:03 AM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 29/05/2026 – 11:30
    As much as I despise Labour, one should also point out that the RRA was brought into being by the Tories to appease the masses. And also S24 was brought into being by the Tories – just topped up by Labour.
    This treachery, amongst other blindingly obvious examples, has resulted in Reform coming to the fore – remember this next time you vote. No Labour, No Tories – and for goodness sakes no Greens or they’ll just have us hung and be done with it!

  • Member Since August 2024 - Comments: 15

    8:08 AM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    Why bother being landlord 🫣 dont want much these days

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 427

    9:44 AM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Kevin Bird at 30/05/2026 – 08:08
    and being a landlord means you won’t have much either after high mortgage rates, high service charges, high tradesman costs, high letting agent fees and no doubt high landlord registration fees and fines.

  • Member Since January 2026 - Comments: 4

    1:16 PM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 29/05/2026 – 08:27
    According to Tony Blair this is the work spoilt bastards playing politics under the guise of being a labour MP’s when they should be helping to formulate policy to deal with the very serious economic and social problems left by the previous regime. This is an attack on business and is compounding the problems not solving them. If the Prime Minister were a decent person he would have called a general election and accepted the result.

  • Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1492 - Articles: 1

    1:32 PM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 14:44
    “t…he majority of landlords may even now be blissfully unaware that a failure to send the Labour Renters Rights Act Information sheet to all named tenants by this Sunday (31st May) CREATES AN OFFENCE under the Labour Renters Rights Act, for which the landlord is potentially liable for £4,000-7,000, potentially rising to £40,000 if the offence continues beyond 28 days,”
    imho serves every landlord right if they do get fined as they should know their business.

  • Member Since September 2025 - Comments: 2

    2:06 PM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by David render at 30/05/2026 – 07:18
    Well said!

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 427

    2:26 PM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 30/05/2026 – 13:32
    IMHO the whole thing is another government /council scam and it is rather unfair to say it serves landlords right if they haven’t notified their tenants. I am lucky to be updated on Property 118, but many landlords are not.I heard BBC radio mention it once and not everyone wants a tv or can afford newspapers or even have internet access.
    Of course these shysters will wheel out “ignorance of the law is no excuse”.

  • Member Since December 2025 - Comments: 4

    9:42 PM, 30th May 2026, About 3 days ago

    Would love to give this so called labour mp a piece of .y mind having been on the unfortunate receiving end of a tenant with serious ASB. The system they have designed makes dealing with these tenants and eventually evicting them close to impossible. Took 9 months to evict a tenant who was persistently breaking the law and breaching almost every term of the tenancy. Judge kicks can 4 months down the road. Was even a risk to safety of ourselves, neighbours and another tenant in the flat.

    A year of stress and police, council and authorities were Compliant and disinterested.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles