7 months ago | 9 comments
A Labour MP has suggested landlords should take a greater role in tackling anti-social behaviour caused by tenants.
In a Parliamentary written question, Connor Naismith MP asked whether the government was taking steps “to make private landlords responsible for dealing with anti-social behaviour caused by their tenants”.
In response, housing minister Matthew Pennycook confirmed under the Renters’ Rights Act, landlords can evict tenants for anti-social behaviour.
Mr Pennycook said: “Tackling anti-social behaviour is a top priority for this government, and a key part of our Safer Streets Mission.
“We will crack down on those making neighbourhoods feel unsafe and unwelcoming by introducing the new Respect Order, which local authorities will be able to apply for, and which will carry tough sanctions and penalties for persistent adult offenders.”
He added: “The police, local authorities and social landlords may already apply for a Civil Injunction under Section 1 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 to prevent behaviour that is causing housing-related nuisance and annoyance.
“Landlords have powers to regain possession where necessary. The Renters’ Rights Act shortened the notice period for the existing mandatory eviction ground (7A). Landlords can make a claim to the court immediately in all cases of anti-social behaviour.
“The act also ensures judges in possession cases have particular regard to whether tenants have engaged with efforts to resolve their behaviour and the impact on other tenants within HMOs.
“Under selective and HMO licensing, local authorities can also use licence conditions to require landlords to take steps to manage and deal with anti-social behaviour caused by their tenants.”
As previously reported by Property118, under the Renters’ Rights Act, when using a discretionary ground for possession, landlords will have to prove that anti-social behaviour has occurred, and the court will then decide whether it is reasonable to evict the tenant.
The government guidance provides examples of what counts as anti-social behaviour, covering both criminal and non-criminal behaviour, for example:
However, the government guidance says minor issues such as problems with bins, parking disputes, or one-off incidents do not count as anti-social behaviour.
The government guidance also claims landlords can reduce the risk of anti-social behaviour by asking for a reference from a previous landlord or letting agency.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
7 months ago | 9 comments
1 year ago | 8 comments
1 year ago | 2 comments
Report form is not available.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 134
12:13 AM, 31st May 2026, About 3 days ago
We might get a court date after a year, be able to present a ton of evidence and get an eviction (unless the tenant is a bit poorly or on a spectrum in which case probably not).
Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 79
7:52 AM, 31st May 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Judith Wordsworth at 30/05/2026 – 13:32
Totally disagree.
Ther was something similar before with the “how To Rent” document but there was no fine but you couldnot evict unless it was served.
Fine is totally disproportionate.
Fine for no car insurance £200
Fine for hit and run £500
Why is the fine so large for an administrative error?
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 427
11:15 AM, 31st May 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Marcel Price at 30/05/2026 – 21:42
I would do exactly that if you have a Labour MP or raise it with your MP and ask them to raise that in the House.
Of course like a Labour councillor I once complained to, his reply was, you won’t be voting for me so I don’t care. Quite an assumption on his part.
Member Since September 2025 - Comments: 34
12:04 PM, 31st May 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by David render at 30/05/2026 – 07:18
I refused to give a reference to a tenant and the leading agent for her next property told me that was illegal. I told her to prove it. Never heard from that leading agent again.
Member Since September 2022 - Comments: 63
5:17 PM, 31st May 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Kevin Bird at 30/05/2026 – 08:08
Most landlords have been put in shackles and handcuffs by the Renters Rights Act. Neither the government nor the councils can possibly expect anything from the landlords anymore.
Member Since January 2026 - Comments: 2
5:50 PM, 31st May 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 29/05/2026 – 11:50
Luckily, I have very good tenants and positive relationship with them. Who knows infuture I may end up with a trouble tenant despite completeing all the checks throughly. I experianced, the situation changing with very little misunderstanding . My estate agents are very good in vetting tenants. I feel very bad for those landlords and tenants who are good but politicians are creating bad environment to grab everything from hardworking citizen.
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 832
8:25 PM, 31st May 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Hassan khan at 31/05/2026 – 17:50
Both of my worst tenants would have passed referencing with flying colours, one became an alcoholic was sacked and cost me thousands in lost rent and legal fees. The other had a marriage break down and the kids started taking drugs and upsetting the neighbours.
However good you think your referencing is it can still happen to you
Member Since July 2024 - Comments: 120
4:41 AM, 1st June 2026, About 2 days ago
Who is this Connor Naismith, how old is he. Perhaps the can review the anti social drug addict tenant case I had. The tenant who came after my Electrician when trying to get my EICR, who jimmied the Electrics for his full 5 year tenancy with no rent increases from us. Who was advised not to pay us rent during Covid by the Agent and who threw needles into the garden below. When I state the Selective License fee what for this exact type of anti-social behavior Durham Council said oh no that’s not on us to deal with and said if you dont get the EICR we can fine you 30k. This despite the fact they knew the Electrician was at risk of being stabbed to death.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2117
11:41 AM, 1st June 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 31/05/2026 – 20:25
I’m sorry you’ve had that experience. I’ve been fortunate not to have that experience directly, but I have known of other people who’ve had tenants who’ve both been taking (not in work) benefits and selling drugs at the same time, and making so much money that they could afford to run very expensive cars that clearly no normal benefits tenant would ever be able to afford.
I guess now under the Labour Renters Right Act you might want to add to the standard right to rent and credit referencing checks a character reference and/or reference from previous landlord, plus let every tenant know they may be subject to a CRB check.
Member Since January 2026 - Comments: 4
2:28 PM, 1st June 2026, About 1 day ago
Reply to the comment left by Suspicious Steve at 31/05/2026 – 07:52
This law is the weapon of hate. Tony Blair appointed socialists activators as judges many years ago. So the old test of “What does the man on the Clapham Omnibus Think” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_on_the_Clapham_omnibus) may no longer apply. Courts may be unable to modify laws that require unreasonable excessive punishments. Consequently Landlords will go underground, council officials who impose penalties will die in strange circumstances and income tax will not be collected. The black economy will grow. This is the most stupid thing our politicians can do and it has spooked Tony Blair because his is a recent catholic convert who does not want to suffer hell and damnation as a consequence.