Electric shower or combi fed shower in a tenanted property?

by Readers Question

4 weeks ago

Electric shower or combi fed shower in a tenanted property?

Make Text Bigger
Electric shower or combi fed shower in a tenanted property?

To my surprise I find that one of my units is currently without a shower.

So I need to get one fitted.

The question is – should I go for an electric one (given the possibly considerable expense and inconvenience of running a new cable) or would a direct from the (combi) boiler one be a good choice?

Pretty well all my other units have electric showers, but my personal preference has always been for non-electrical ones – albeit fed from a hot water storage tank rather than direct from a combi boiler.

What does the panel think – are showers fed from combi boilers a good viable and long term solution – i.e. reliable and provide a good showering experience for the user? I have some concerns about the boiler shutting off at low flow rates due to high temperatures in the heat exchanger thus delivering a sudden dose of freezing cold water to the tenant in the shower – followed very shortly by a dose of scaldingly hot water as the user whacks up the shower mixer control temperature in an urgent attempt to compensate and the boiler responds accordingly. Obviously not a desirable situation!

Clearly, a combi fed shower would be more economical to install as the local hot water plumbing is already in place for the bath and it does not entail the possibly difficult chasing in and subsequent redecoration needed by a new cable run, but the decision is not fundamentally about cost – I want the shower to be a good experience for the tenants.

What are your views?

Tony



Comments

Neil Patterson

4 weeks ago

Hi Tony,

Like you I am not a big fan of electric showers as they always seem a bit weak and temperamental in maintaining a constant temperature. Mixer showers from a hot water tank as long as you have pressure seem far more consistent, but I am not familiar with how they work using Combi boilers.

David Nic

4 weeks ago

You can get a great powerful shower via a combo boiler as it's a pressurised system and a good thermostatic mixer will control the temperature issue especially when someone turns a kitchen tap on at the same time.
My personal preference is the combo if for myself but there are extra benefits using electric with a rental property being if the boiler breaks down the tenant still has hot water. So a couple of electric heaters will buy you time to sort the boiler out without the tenant screaming at you.

Jay James

4 weeks ago

Thermostatic mixer showers work very well from combi boilers - if installed properly.

I much prefer using the combi boiler shower I have because it seems cheaper on fuel than electric showers. It is also quicker to heat up than the electric showers I have used. Ditto for maintaining consistent temperatures. (I am one person in a one bed property).

Separately, whichever you decide on, don't try to save money on doing it properly. My new boiler was £2400 (thermostatic shower already in place) - I don't know how that compares to a quality job on an electric shower. Which? magazine has some very informative articles discussing the two over the last 3/4 years. These are searchable.

I always fit electric showers (at least 8.5kw for a resonable flow) because if the boiler breaks down the tenant still has hot water so its not an emergency. A combi fed shower may be a bit cheaper to run for the tenants but its totally dependant on the boiler. Also if you have a low water pressure and/or small combi boiler eg 24kw in a flat a combi fed shower won't have a particularly good flow. Apart from the wiring which you only do once the costs aren't very different, in fact the electric shower is often cheaper than a thermostatic one.

paul biggs

4 weeks ago

the only way to go is a combi and good shower mixer, everything in life breaks down.

St. Jims

4 weeks ago

The more tenants under one roof, the greater the need to have a hot water tank (such as a Megaflo or other generic versions of same). This is because combi’s generally don’t have enough grunt to deal with three hot taps open at once. Some can deal with two taps at once, most are happiest with just one. Megaflos are expensive at £3-5k and they’re bulky, but for a six-person HMO like mine they are indispensable. I wasted a lot of money before I found that out!

The Property Man

4 weeks ago

Electric shower all the way, if the boiler breaks down then the tenant has no hot water. At least with an electric shower they still have hot water so the tenant isn’t on the phone ever 2 minutes for an update on the boiler part that has been ordered!! The only down side is the initial cost to get one installed.

James Barnes

4 weeks ago

When I first moved into my current property the shower was fed from the hot water tank and the pressure was desperately weak and also scolding hot.
I changed the whole set up and installed a combi-boiler which works great, so much so I eventually had to fit a flow restrictor on the shower house.

Dylan Morris

4 weeks ago

A friend of mine recently had the same dilemma (for his own use he's not a landlord). He decided to have a shower powered from his existing combi. The flow rate turned out much better than an electric one. As he needed the shower over his bath it was very cheap to install. He purchased a bath mixer tap with integral shower attachment from Screwfix for around £60 (the kind of thing you see in a hotel bathroom with a little pull up plunger device to alter the water flow up the shower cord) and got a plumber to fit the new mixer/shower tap for £50. A pole and curtain was £30 so total cost around £150.

D

4 weeks ago

In my experience the biggest problem for tenants is when they can't have a shower because it's broken for whatever reason. I always fit both, then you havn't got quite the same emergency when one goes.

1 2

Leave Comments

Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.

Forgotten your password?

OR

BECOME A MEMBER

What information is it reasonable for a freeholder to demand?