3 days ago | 3 comments
Landlords face a second successive Budget tax raid after Chancellor John Healey announced another increase in tax on property income.
Tax rates on property and savings income will increase by a further two percentage points from April 2027, adding to the rise announced by Rachel Reeves last year.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has warned the measures risk driving landlords out of the market and pushing rents higher for tenants.
The Telegraph reports that the announcement suggests property income tax rates will reach 24% for basic-rate taxpayers, 44% for higher-rate taxpayers and 49% for those paying the additional rate. Full details have yet to be confirmed.
The move puts the taxation of landlords’ income at the centre of a Budget which also includes support for household energy bills.
Delivering his maiden Budget, Mr Healey told MPs: “I am increasing the rates of tax on income from property and savings by a further two percentage points from April 2027.
“With no change to tax on income from dividends and tax on income from employment.”
For landlords, the announcement brings a further squeeze on returns, with the precise impact depending on their circumstances and the detailed provisions.
The OBR issued a scathing warning over the property tax rise, saying it risks shrinking the rental market and driving rents higher.
The OBR said: “These measures collectively risk leading to a steady rise in rents through two effects. First, potential landlords are less likely to enter the market, reducing long-run rental supply, which risks a steady long-term rise in rents if demand outstrips supply – which we think is more likely than not.
“Second, landlords are likely to pass on more of these costs to renters in the long-run through a combination of some current landlords leaving, thereby giving more price setting power to remaining landlords, and greater long-run flexibility to raise rents.
“Such rises in rents would offset at least some of the reduction in the commercial viability to landlords from the measures introduced in recent years.”
Greg Tsuman, managing director for Lettings, Martyn Gerrard said the further rise “may as well criminalise’ renting out a property”.
He said: “Adding a further two per cent tax to property income on top of the previously announced two per cent is a surprising and incomprehensible decision. Last year’s Autumn Budget dealt a severe blow to the sector, but it looks like the Government wants to finish it off.
“The OBR was already warning that the level of tax being imposed on landlords was likely to drive up rents and reduce rental property supply. This is lunacy and I fear that the Government is actively trying to dismantle the PRS. At this point, the government may as well criminalise renting out a property.
“Landlords have endured successive measures against them for years and we’re already seeing an unprecedented exodus from the rental market. There was a desperate need to reassure and provide confidence. Instead, we’ll see the rush to the door intensifying. The property market is already struggling with the oversupply of rental properties being sold and we’re going to see even more downwards pressure on house prices as a result of this.”
Ben Beadle, chief executive of the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), said: “The Chancellor has today made life harder for renters right across the country.
“As the Office for Budget Responsibility has confirmed, hiking taxes will drive up rents and drive down supply in the rental market when demand is already way ahead of the number of homes available.
“How that fits with a commitment to providing households with more breathing space is anyone’s guess.”
Elsewhere in the Budget, also confirmed that tenants in England will not face Stamp Duty Land Tax on rent under assured tenancies, following the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Act on 1 May 2026. The exemption is intended to prevent tenants from being inadvertently liable for the tax due to changes in tenancy rules.
The government also pledged a further £430m to tackle rough sleeping, on top of the £442m announced in August, taking total investment to £874m by the end of the current parliament.
The Chancellor also announced the Your First Home scheme, which aims to help 70,000 first-time buyers onto the property ladder and save them hundreds of pounds a month.
Eligible buyers will be able to purchase a home with a deposit of at least 2.5%, a repayment mortgage from a participating lender and a government equity loan worth 20% of the purchase price, interest-free for the first five years.
The Budget also includes a further £1.5bn for social and affordable housing, taking total capital investment over the next decade to more than £40bn.
Smaller housing developments on brownfield land will also be exempt from Biodiversity Net Gain requirements, in a move intended to make building cheaper and simpler.
However, the Chancellor made no mention of Local Housing Allowance meaning it remains frozen.
On the rise of property tax rise, Andrew Lloyd, managing director at property data firm, Search Acumen, said: “Landlords will feel an underhand blow from the Chancellor today. Raising tax rates on income from property by a further two percentage points from April 2027 is a concern for small and accidental landlords whose margins have already been eroded this year, and we will undoubtedly see this impact in supply and rents over the next year.
“Conversely, the zero-rate on land sold to social housing providers announced will help incentivise the build and supply of council homes, a much-needed win for the struggling sector.”
Tony Hall, head of business development at Saffron for Intermediaries, said: “Last year’s increase has yet to take effect, and the Chancellor has already doubled it. Raising property income tax rates to 24%, 44% and 49% from April 2027 adds yet more pressure on landlords already navigating rising costs and substantial regulatory change.
“The government describes this as fair and proportionate, but landlords will judge it against the cost of providing a home. Maintenance, repairs, safety checks and property improvements all need funding. Taking more of the income leaves less available to reinvest.
“Many landlords are already rethinking how they operate, whether through limited companies, changes to their portfolios or investment in HMOs and multi-unit blocks. These decisions require careful advice and long-term planning. Repeated tax increases make that planning harder and risk discouraging further investment.
“If the government wants more good-quality homes to rent, it needs to give landlords reasons to provide them. Squeezing rental investment further risks leaving tenants with fewer choices and higher costs.”
Rob Stanton, sales and distribution director at Landbay, said: “Having already announced a 2% increase in income tax on property income in last year’s Budget, the Government has now doubled that increase to 4%, which will take the basic rate to 24%, the higher rate to 44% and the additional rate to 49% from April 2027.
“This applies to landlords who hold their rental properties in their personal names across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, rather than those who own through limited companies, and clearly represents a significant additional tax burden at a time when landlords are already managing higher mortgage costs, growing regulatory responsibilities and the expense of maintaining their properties.
“This is unlikely to encourage further investment in the private rental sector, particularly among landlords already questioning whether individual properties remain financially viable.
He added: “Our latest landlord survey, showed that almost 80% of landlords were concerned about further tax changes ahead of the Budget, and today’s announcement suggests those concerns were well founded.
“The consequences of this decision are unlikely to be felt by landlords alone, because when the costs of providing rental housing increase, there is a real likelihood that some of those costs will eventually be passed on to tenants through higher rents.
“Equally concerning is the potential impact on rental housing supply, with further taxation likely to make some landlords reconsider purchasing additional properties, while others may decide to sell existing investments. At a time when we need to encourage investment and ensure there are sufficient rental homes to meet demand, measures which risk reducing supply could ultimately make life even more difficult for tenants, particularly if fewer available properties place additional upward pressure on rents.”
Steve Cox, chief commercial officer at Fleet Mortgages, said: “The further increase in property income tax is likely to make many landlords reconsider how they hold their rental properties, particularly those with larger portfolios who may already be paying higher rates of income tax.
“Our latest Q3 Rental Barometer showed that 71% of buy-to-let mortgage applications in Q3 were made through limited companies, compared to 78% in the previous quarter, suggesting there had been some movement back towards individual borrowing.
“However, with property income tax rates now set to rise even further than previously announced, we would not be surprised to see more landlords considering whether they should continue to hold their properties in their individual names or explore instead the potential benefits of limited company ownership.”
Jeremy Leaf, north London estate agent and a former RICS residential chairman, said: “Sadly, there was nothing to encourage new landlords into the buy-to-let sector or anything to persuade others to stay invested. There is an urgent need to stem the flow of those leaving the sector or rents will keep rising and standards will keep declining.
“Hopefully, activity at the very least won’t be any worse than before, while those sitting on the fence will be persuaded to come down and get on with their moves.”
Marc von Grundherr, the director of lettings and estate agency Benham and Reeves, said: “Landlords have been kicked while they’re down once again, with the Chancellor delivering yet another blow to buy to let profitability.
“The private rented sector is already contending with higher operating costs, mounting regulatory obligations, and the financial pressures of maintaining rental homes, so a further increase in property income tax is the last thing landlords need.
“The Government cannot continue to squeeze landlords financially while expecting them to provide the homes the nation so desperately needs.
“If investment in the sector becomes increasingly unattractive, more landlords will inevitably reconsider their position, further reducing rental stock and placing additional upward pressure on rents for tenants.”
Roma Sharma, the managing director of property management specialists Rushbrook, said: “With the Government’s sustained campaign against landlords, a hit to buy to let profitability has become a frequent and almost expected feature of the Autumn Budget.
“Today’s further increase in property income tax is another blow to a sector already grappling with rising operating costs, tighter regulation, and growing financial pressures.
“The concern is that landlords can only absorb so much before difficult decisions have to be made. Whether that’s delaying essential property improvements, increasing rents where possible, or exiting the market altogether, the consequences will ultimately be felt by tenants who are already struggling with limited choice and affordability.”
69 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Next Article
Property experts slam Budget tax raid on landlords
3 days ago | 3 comments
1 week ago | 2 comments
Member Since June 2026 - Comments: 15
12:18 AM, 29th October 2026, About 20 hours ago
As this only affects private landlords, there’s barely any news coverage on this and we are too small in numbers to fight back. So easy pickings. The RRA has effectively made it much more difficult and riskier to raise rents, so that’s not an easy option to pursue. But the absolute killer is that even if you sell, you can’t now get a decent return on your cash as the additional income tax rate also applies to interest on savings. So you are forced to look at equities which are risky, even if you know what you are doing. Everywhere you turn, you’re clobbered by Labour. It’s an ideological thing – they want to bring everyone down to the lowest possible denominator. Pure robbery, in my opinion, targeting those who have a little extra. The ultra rich will always be fine. It’s the “middle layer” who will be squeezed and squeezed, until you wonder why you bothered. CGT increases confined to rental properties coming soon, to a cinema near you.
Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 347
8:28 AM, 29th October 2026, About 12 hours ago
The only minor postive is the mortgage interest tax credit goes up an addtional 2% so will be 24% BUT I can’t see Healy and Burnham keeping this tax credit for mortgaged LLs in the next two budgets. Has anyone in the media called him out on this ‘direct’ rental income tax increase on LL ending up as an ‘indirect’ tax on tenants via higher rents as mentioned by OBR?
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 535 - Articles: 1
9:10 AM, 29th October 2026, About 11 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 28/10/2026 – 18:04
As long as that Dan Niedle gent is sniffing about, I agree, incorporating existing BTLs still carries risk of CGT and SDLT.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1771 - Articles: 3
9:17 AM, 29th October 2026, About 11 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 28/10/2026 – 20:47
They can lay the blame on landlords as much as they like. It doesn’t change the fact that many won’t have anywhere decent and affordable to live, while landlords can choose where next to invest their money.
What these incompetent idiots don’t understand is the scale of the PRS supply chain.
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 269
9:21 AM, 29th October 2026, About 11 hours ago
Nice con trick!
Making a show of beating up the rich landlords, with a 20% tax increase.
But it will actually impact poor and working class tenants, when landlords put up rents to cover this.
Its very considerate for Healey to set aside a huge increase in funds for the homeless, because that’s where thousands of tenants are headed.
Nice bit of forward planning there.
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 674
9:36 AM, 29th October 2026, About 11 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Ana at 29/10/2026 – 00:18
Are there any cinemas left, but if there are what a good idea as they can be used to house the homeless.Hope Angela is reading this.
How about government gilts or do you think the UK is about to go bankrupt, which would not surprise me.
Labour is also receiving criticism from business for increasing the minimum wage for the third time and for new employment laws , probably pushed by their trade unions, which will increase unemployment, but I really don’t think they have a clue about anything.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3776 - Articles: 5
10:17 AM, 29th October 2026, About 10 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by David100 at 29/10/2026 – 09:21
… only if these tenants are already in a property and the rent is going to be increased. The gvt are either expecting LL’s not to bother with an increase, or increase but keep it low enough for them to be able to afford it, because the flip side is that the tenant MAY leave and then the LL has an empty property.
Those already ‘poor’/ working class/benefits currently looking for a rental, if there is an increase in rents, will doubtful pass affordability. They rarely have a guarantor and even then its not the ‘risk mitigation’ panacea that everyone goes on about post RRA. With no guarantor and lack of affordability then they cant afford a paid-for guarantor service either (even IF the LL is willing to accept one).
The reality already is that people cannot afford rents where they are.
1. Of those not in arrears they can’t move anywhere cheaper because everything else is MR or above and not forgetting all the associated moving costs like RIA and deposit.
So they don’t move.
2. The ones already in accommodation but in rent debt wont be able to find another LL to take them on.
They cant move.
3. The ones on benefits/lower wages who have no rental history, trying to get out of temp accommodation/sofa surfing etc and looking for accommodation wont be even looked at – never mind even progressing to affordability (which probably unlikely to pass)
The wont be offered anything.
The rental market is literally at stagnation point. No fluidity, so effecting the whole PRS.
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 351
11:01 AM, 29th October 2026, About 9 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 29/10/2026 – 10:17
Very good summary. I’d say this will take about two years to develop and be visibly attributable to government policy, especially that of Labour who had enough evidence to see the emerging effects of Osborne and Gove’s tenures on the PRS but decided to continue down the path with an even stronger version of the Tory’s RRB, increased SDLT premium plus two separate income tax rises for unincorporated landlords.
Assuming Burnham doesn’t call an early GE, in just two years from now we will be entering the run up to the 2029 Election. This is less time than has elapsed from the 2024 GE to today and we all know how many new social homes (or indeed any homes) have actually been built compared to the election promises and we all know that yesterday’s Budget promises will be in the same vein. I’ll be fully out by then but those landlords remaining plus the organisations that represent them will have a chance to capitalise on the situation that even the most left wing tenant’ groups will have trouble in distancing from the direct effects of government policy towards the smaller PRS landlords.
There is certainly scope for one of the opposition parties to have a grown up conversation with tenants on how the attack on the PRS (and Healey’s increase on rental income tax on top of an increase that has yet to even take effect shows him to be both foolhardy and even more economically dense than Reeves if he thinks this is low hanging fruit without consequences and formalises the govt position as one of hatred of PRS landlords). We all know from personal experience and surveys by respectable bodies that the vast majority of tenants are satisfied and have reasonable understanding of their landlords side of the equation. Let’s hope this can be harnessed in the next GE run up to give pay back to Labour and get some balance and incentive for smaller landlords to remain and invest.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2330 - Articles: 2
11:01 AM, 29th October 2026, About 9 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 29/10/2026 – 10:17
The lack of fluidity also affects the working population who cannot move to a new job. Stalemate.
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 351
11:18 AM, 29th October 2026, About 9 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 29/10/2026 – 11:01
Yet there are still many clinging to an outdated view that landlordism is always unproductive use of capital and theft of the workers’ wages.
They must be stuck in a previous age where career advancement meant promotion within one local organisation and a housing market where owner occupiers with their sights further afield could move relatively easily and cheaply which certainly isn’t the case today with high house prices, high SDLT and conveyancing taking longer and longer.
In a rather bland budget due to being tied to not touching standard income tax, VAT and NI, Healey’s apparent failure to link a healthy PRS to the economic benefit of mobility for the economy by yet another tax increase on rent income leaves me with the distinct impression he is even more economically inept than Reeves with the potential for even more damage one he gets into his stride.