5 days ago | 3 comments
Landlords face a second successive Budget tax raid after Chancellor John Healey announced another increase in tax on property income.
Tax rates on property and savings income will increase by a further two percentage points from April 2027, adding to the rise announced by Rachel Reeves last year.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has warned the measures risk driving landlords out of the market and pushing rents higher for tenants.
The Telegraph reports that the announcement suggests property income tax rates will reach 24% for basic-rate taxpayers, 44% for higher-rate taxpayers and 49% for those paying the additional rate. Full details have yet to be confirmed.
The move puts the taxation of landlords’ income at the centre of a Budget which also includes support for household energy bills.
Delivering his maiden Budget, Mr Healey told MPs: “I am increasing the rates of tax on income from property and savings by a further two percentage points from April 2027.
“With no change to tax on income from dividends and tax on income from employment.”
For landlords, the announcement brings a further squeeze on returns, with the precise impact depending on their circumstances and the detailed provisions.
The OBR issued a scathing warning over the property tax rise, saying it risks shrinking the rental market and driving rents higher.
The OBR said: “These measures collectively risk leading to a steady rise in rents through two effects. First, potential landlords are less likely to enter the market, reducing long-run rental supply, which risks a steady long-term rise in rents if demand outstrips supply – which we think is more likely than not.
“Second, landlords are likely to pass on more of these costs to renters in the long-run through a combination of some current landlords leaving, thereby giving more price setting power to remaining landlords, and greater long-run flexibility to raise rents.
“Such rises in rents would offset at least some of the reduction in the commercial viability to landlords from the measures introduced in recent years.”
Greg Tsuman, managing director for Lettings, Martyn Gerrard said the further rise “may as well criminalise’ renting out a property”.
He said: “Adding a further two per cent tax to property income on top of the previously announced two per cent is a surprising and incomprehensible decision. Last year’s Autumn Budget dealt a severe blow to the sector, but it looks like the Government wants to finish it off.
“The OBR was already warning that the level of tax being imposed on landlords was likely to drive up rents and reduce rental property supply. This is lunacy and I fear that the Government is actively trying to dismantle the PRS. At this point, the government may as well criminalise renting out a property.
“Landlords have endured successive measures against them for years and we’re already seeing an unprecedented exodus from the rental market. There was a desperate need to reassure and provide confidence. Instead, we’ll see the rush to the door intensifying. The property market is already struggling with the oversupply of rental properties being sold and we’re going to see even more downwards pressure on house prices as a result of this.”
Ben Beadle, chief executive of the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), said: “The Chancellor has today made life harder for renters right across the country.
“As the Office for Budget Responsibility has confirmed, hiking taxes will drive up rents and drive down supply in the rental market when demand is already way ahead of the number of homes available.
“How that fits with a commitment to providing households with more breathing space is anyone’s guess.”
Elsewhere in the Budget, also confirmed that tenants in England will not face Stamp Duty Land Tax on rent under assured tenancies, following the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Act on 1 May 2026. The exemption is intended to prevent tenants from being inadvertently liable for the tax due to changes in tenancy rules.
The government also pledged a further £430m to tackle rough sleeping, on top of the £442m announced in August, taking total investment to £874m by the end of the current parliament.
The Chancellor also announced the Your First Home scheme, which aims to help 70,000 first-time buyers onto the property ladder and save them hundreds of pounds a month.
Eligible buyers will be able to purchase a home with a deposit of at least 2.5%, a repayment mortgage from a participating lender and a government equity loan worth 20% of the purchase price, interest-free for the first five years.
The Budget also includes a further £1.5bn for social and affordable housing, taking total capital investment over the next decade to more than £40bn.
Smaller housing developments on brownfield land will also be exempt from Biodiversity Net Gain requirements, in a move intended to make building cheaper and simpler.
However, the Chancellor made no mention of Local Housing Allowance meaning it remains frozen.
On the rise of property tax rise, Andrew Lloyd, managing director at property data firm, Search Acumen, said: “Landlords will feel an underhand blow from the Chancellor today. Raising tax rates on income from property by a further two percentage points from April 2027 is a concern for small and accidental landlords whose margins have already been eroded this year, and we will undoubtedly see this impact in supply and rents over the next year.
“Conversely, the zero-rate on land sold to social housing providers announced will help incentivise the build and supply of council homes, a much-needed win for the struggling sector.”
Tony Hall, head of business development at Saffron for Intermediaries, said: “Last year’s increase has yet to take effect, and the Chancellor has already doubled it. Raising property income tax rates to 24%, 44% and 49% from April 2027 adds yet more pressure on landlords already navigating rising costs and substantial regulatory change.
“The government describes this as fair and proportionate, but landlords will judge it against the cost of providing a home. Maintenance, repairs, safety checks and property improvements all need funding. Taking more of the income leaves less available to reinvest.
“Many landlords are already rethinking how they operate, whether through limited companies, changes to their portfolios or investment in HMOs and multi-unit blocks. These decisions require careful advice and long-term planning. Repeated tax increases make that planning harder and risk discouraging further investment.
“If the government wants more good-quality homes to rent, it needs to give landlords reasons to provide them. Squeezing rental investment further risks leaving tenants with fewer choices and higher costs.”
Rob Stanton, sales and distribution director at Landbay, said: “Having already announced a 2% increase in income tax on property income in last year’s Budget, the Government has now doubled that increase to 4%, which will take the basic rate to 24%, the higher rate to 44% and the additional rate to 49% from April 2027.
“This applies to landlords who hold their rental properties in their personal names across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, rather than those who own through limited companies, and clearly represents a significant additional tax burden at a time when landlords are already managing higher mortgage costs, growing regulatory responsibilities and the expense of maintaining their properties.
“This is unlikely to encourage further investment in the private rental sector, particularly among landlords already questioning whether individual properties remain financially viable.
He added: “Our latest landlord survey, showed that almost 80% of landlords were concerned about further tax changes ahead of the Budget, and today’s announcement suggests those concerns were well founded.
“The consequences of this decision are unlikely to be felt by landlords alone, because when the costs of providing rental housing increase, there is a real likelihood that some of those costs will eventually be passed on to tenants through higher rents.
“Equally concerning is the potential impact on rental housing supply, with further taxation likely to make some landlords reconsider purchasing additional properties, while others may decide to sell existing investments. At a time when we need to encourage investment and ensure there are sufficient rental homes to meet demand, measures which risk reducing supply could ultimately make life even more difficult for tenants, particularly if fewer available properties place additional upward pressure on rents.”
Steve Cox, chief commercial officer at Fleet Mortgages, said: “The further increase in property income tax is likely to make many landlords reconsider how they hold their rental properties, particularly those with larger portfolios who may already be paying higher rates of income tax.
“Our latest Q3 Rental Barometer showed that 71% of buy-to-let mortgage applications in Q3 were made through limited companies, compared to 78% in the previous quarter, suggesting there had been some movement back towards individual borrowing.
“However, with property income tax rates now set to rise even further than previously announced, we would not be surprised to see more landlords considering whether they should continue to hold their properties in their individual names or explore instead the potential benefits of limited company ownership.”
Jeremy Leaf, north London estate agent and a former RICS residential chairman, said: “Sadly, there was nothing to encourage new landlords into the buy-to-let sector or anything to persuade others to stay invested. There is an urgent need to stem the flow of those leaving the sector or rents will keep rising and standards will keep declining.
“Hopefully, activity at the very least won’t be any worse than before, while those sitting on the fence will be persuaded to come down and get on with their moves.”
Marc von Grundherr, the director of lettings and estate agency Benham and Reeves, said: “Landlords have been kicked while they’re down once again, with the Chancellor delivering yet another blow to buy to let profitability.
“The private rented sector is already contending with higher operating costs, mounting regulatory obligations, and the financial pressures of maintaining rental homes, so a further increase in property income tax is the last thing landlords need.
“The Government cannot continue to squeeze landlords financially while expecting them to provide the homes the nation so desperately needs.
“If investment in the sector becomes increasingly unattractive, more landlords will inevitably reconsider their position, further reducing rental stock and placing additional upward pressure on rents for tenants.”
Roma Sharma, the managing director of property management specialists Rushbrook, said: “With the Government’s sustained campaign against landlords, a hit to buy to let profitability has become a frequent and almost expected feature of the Autumn Budget.
“Today’s further increase in property income tax is another blow to a sector already grappling with rising operating costs, tighter regulation, and growing financial pressures.
“The concern is that landlords can only absorb so much before difficult decisions have to be made. Whether that’s delaying essential property improvements, increasing rents where possible, or exiting the market altogether, the consequences will ultimately be felt by tenants who are already struggling with limited choice and affordability.”
104 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Next Article
Property experts slam Budget tax raid on landlords
5 days ago | 3 comments
1 week ago | 2 comments
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 353
10:54 AM, 31st October 2026, About 22 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Ray Lancaster at 31/10/2026 – 09:53
To be strictly fair, landlords aren’t the only ones paying the 4% premium on income tax. It applies to savings interest too. I use my annual ISA allowance to invest in REITs and other shares leaving the tax free first £1000 of cash savings interest tax free before the new basic rate rate of 24% would apply next spring. At 5% pa that means only £20,000 cash is protected from taxation of the interest at the premium rates.
Whilst they are hitting landlords they are also swiping at those like myself whose investment pot is derived from the sale of rental properties and who are providing for their current needs and potential future care costs. When I hear the clowns drivelling about “fairness” it just about makes my head explode.
My starting pot of around £50k was derived from the sale of a trading business in 1990 and was what was left after paying around £10k CGT. Other funds introduced were from earned income on which I obviously paid Income tax and NI. And to date I’ve paid at least £250k CGT when selling off the portfolio.
I am intending using the low interest coupon gilt route to hold cash above the taxable interest level. Luckily my existing stocks and shares platform provider allows these to be bought and sold very simply. The gilts are redeemed at their face value of £100 on redemption date and the bulk of the return is the capital gain on the discounted purchase price – the key being they are exempt from CGT.
Just two things needed, the govt not to change the CGT exemption and to be solvent enough to pay the face value on redemption day..
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2639
10:57 AM, 31st October 2026, About 22 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Ray Lancaster at 31/10/2026 – 09:53
Governments do this because they need a scapegoat for their failed policies. None of it makes sense. But it’s not landlords paying this rate of tax…it is tenants because landlords will raise rent to cover the extra tax. The government knows this and it knows that it is using tenants as tax collectors. None of it makes any sense but the government keeps hanging in there doing this in the hope that enough voters will believe their lies to keep them in power.
Member Since March 2020 - Comments: 30
11:03 AM, 31st October 2026, About 21 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 31/10/2026 – 10:54
Yes, I know some savings are taxed at the additional 4% rate, but those are classed as unearned income assets. Rent from properties are being classed the same as that, which they shouldn’t be. You don’t just sit back and let the income roll in. As I mentioned previously I am working in excess of 20 hours a week on my portfolio on average. No other occupation has this tax levy.
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1054
12:32 PM, 31st October 2026, About 20 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Ray Lancaster at 31/10/2026 – 09:53
…. and why do incorporated Landlords get off scot-free and only pay 19% corporation tax!!!
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1054
12:39 PM, 31st October 2026, About 20 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 31/10/2026 – 10:57
The Government is hoping that private Landlords will be competing against incorporated Landlords and limit how much they can increase rents. But they haven’t factored in the reduction in supply that their policy results in nor the fact that incorporated Landlords will raise their rents and make extra profit.
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 353
12:48 PM, 31st October 2026, About 20 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Ray Lancaster at 31/10/2026 – 11:03
But looking at it the other way around my ‘savings assets’ are the retirement provision from liquidating my properties. If you’re looking at the work done angle, then that has a sell by date. I was very hands on in repairs, renovations etc but after 36 years and now a state pensioner. Of course property income isn’t relevant earnings for investing in a SIPP etc so the only option for retirement is selling. I contrast the elevated tax rate on my interest with those with private pension income which is technically not earned but of course is a result of previously earning. Those income tax rates are not subject to the premium.
My rental income was my sole source of income for twenty years. Not sure what the current NI position is but I never paid any – but I recall discussions on hours above 20 a week meaning it may be payable by hands on landlords.
The additional rates are not really fair to anybody but Labour has this misguided play on so called fairness.
Member Since May 2021 - Comments: 420
2:06 PM, 31st October 2026, About 18 hours ago
Let’s hope that the tenants are all aware of what this despicable government are doing but I’m sure landlords will be making sure they’re well informed. Remember “all good landlords have nothing to fear” …more bs from the aholes in Westminster. I hope one day someone catches up with them.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 536 - Articles: 1
2:48 PM, 31st October 2026, About 18 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Gromit at 12:39
The reality is that the big corporate landlords are hugely more expensive than Mom and Pop landlords, also they only really can make it work for themselves in densely built apartment blocks, where the closeness of each property and multi ownership cancels out their lack of competitiveness. They are absent from family homes with gardens, more or less.
Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 350
3:06 PM, 31st October 2026, About 17 hours ago
Labour will be back for more tax from LLs. Nothing to stop them from removal of 24% MIR tax credit will next time so need to factior that into the number of our business models. They won’t care Tenants end up paying indirectly as no media outlet wants to champion the value of PRS LLs. Ie The extra 4% tax on LLs is hardly headline news so they know they can get away with it again next time.
Member Since October 2021 - Comments: 45
3:09 PM, 31st October 2026, About 17 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 31/10/2026 – 10:57
Increasing rent to cover increased costs is not straightforward.
The government have thought ahead and boxed us in.
Renters can challenge rents and unless the current rent is well within a proven rental market, rent tribunals will act in the tenants favour.
This practice can be worse than having rent controls, in fact this is a form of rent control .we are being cornered into accepting the minimum or lose out.