2 weeks ago | 4 comments
Landlords face a second successive Budget tax raid after Chancellor John Healey announced another increase in tax on property income.
Tax rates on property and savings income will increase by a further two percentage points from April 2027, adding to the rise announced by Rachel Reeves last year.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has warned the measures risk driving landlords out of the market and pushing rents higher for tenants.
The Telegraph reports that the announcement suggests property income tax rates will reach 24% for basic-rate taxpayers, 44% for higher-rate taxpayers and 49% for those paying the additional rate. Full details have yet to be confirmed.
The move puts the taxation of landlords’ income at the centre of a Budget which also includes support for household energy bills.
Delivering his maiden Budget, Mr Healey told MPs: “I am increasing the rates of tax on income from property and savings by a further two percentage points from April 2027.
“With no change to tax on income from dividends and tax on income from employment.”
For landlords, the announcement brings a further squeeze on returns, with the precise impact depending on their circumstances and the detailed provisions.
The OBR issued a scathing warning over the property tax rise, saying it risks shrinking the rental market and driving rents higher.
The OBR said: “These measures collectively risk leading to a steady rise in rents through two effects. First, potential landlords are less likely to enter the market, reducing long-run rental supply, which risks a steady long-term rise in rents if demand outstrips supply – which we think is more likely than not.
“Second, landlords are likely to pass on more of these costs to renters in the long-run through a combination of some current landlords leaving, thereby giving more price setting power to remaining landlords, and greater long-run flexibility to raise rents.
“Such rises in rents would offset at least some of the reduction in the commercial viability to landlords from the measures introduced in recent years.”
Greg Tsuman, managing director for Lettings, Martyn Gerrard said the further rise “may as well criminalise’ renting out a property”.
He said: “Adding a further two per cent tax to property income on top of the previously announced two per cent is a surprising and incomprehensible decision. Last year’s Autumn Budget dealt a severe blow to the sector, but it looks like the Government wants to finish it off.
“The OBR was already warning that the level of tax being imposed on landlords was likely to drive up rents and reduce rental property supply. This is lunacy and I fear that the Government is actively trying to dismantle the PRS. At this point, the government may as well criminalise renting out a property.
“Landlords have endured successive measures against them for years and we’re already seeing an unprecedented exodus from the rental market. There was a desperate need to reassure and provide confidence. Instead, we’ll see the rush to the door intensifying. The property market is already struggling with the oversupply of rental properties being sold and we’re going to see even more downwards pressure on house prices as a result of this.”
Ben Beadle, chief executive of the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), said: “The Chancellor has today made life harder for renters right across the country.
“As the Office for Budget Responsibility has confirmed, hiking taxes will drive up rents and drive down supply in the rental market when demand is already way ahead of the number of homes available.
“How that fits with a commitment to providing households with more breathing space is anyone’s guess.”
Elsewhere in the Budget, also confirmed that tenants in England will not face Stamp Duty Land Tax on rent under assured tenancies, following the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Act on 1 May 2026. The exemption is intended to prevent tenants from being inadvertently liable for the tax due to changes in tenancy rules.
The government also pledged a further £430m to tackle rough sleeping, on top of the £442m announced in August, taking total investment to £874m by the end of the current parliament.
The Chancellor also announced the Your First Home scheme, which aims to help 70,000 first-time buyers onto the property ladder and save them hundreds of pounds a month.
Eligible buyers will be able to purchase a home with a deposit of at least 2.5%, a repayment mortgage from a participating lender and a government equity loan worth 20% of the purchase price, interest-free for the first five years.
The Budget also includes a further £1.5bn for social and affordable housing, taking total capital investment over the next decade to more than £40bn.
Smaller housing developments on brownfield land will also be exempt from Biodiversity Net Gain requirements, in a move intended to make building cheaper and simpler.
However, the Chancellor made no mention of Local Housing Allowance meaning it remains frozen.
On the rise of property tax rise, Andrew Lloyd, managing director at property data firm, Search Acumen, said: “Landlords will feel an underhand blow from the Chancellor today. Raising tax rates on income from property by a further two percentage points from April 2027 is a concern for small and accidental landlords whose margins have already been eroded this year, and we will undoubtedly see this impact in supply and rents over the next year.
“Conversely, the zero-rate on land sold to social housing providers announced will help incentivise the build and supply of council homes, a much-needed win for the struggling sector.”
Tony Hall, head of business development at Saffron for Intermediaries, said: “Last year’s increase has yet to take effect, and the Chancellor has already doubled it. Raising property income tax rates to 24%, 44% and 49% from April 2027 adds yet more pressure on landlords already navigating rising costs and substantial regulatory change.
“The government describes this as fair and proportionate, but landlords will judge it against the cost of providing a home. Maintenance, repairs, safety checks and property improvements all need funding. Taking more of the income leaves less available to reinvest.
“Many landlords are already rethinking how they operate, whether through limited companies, changes to their portfolios or investment in HMOs and multi-unit blocks. These decisions require careful advice and long-term planning. Repeated tax increases make that planning harder and risk discouraging further investment.
“If the government wants more good-quality homes to rent, it needs to give landlords reasons to provide them. Squeezing rental investment further risks leaving tenants with fewer choices and higher costs.”
Rob Stanton, sales and distribution director at Landbay, said: “Having already announced a 2% increase in income tax on property income in last year’s Budget, the Government has now doubled that increase to 4%, which will take the basic rate to 24%, the higher rate to 44% and the additional rate to 49% from April 2027.
“This applies to landlords who hold their rental properties in their personal names across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, rather than those who own through limited companies, and clearly represents a significant additional tax burden at a time when landlords are already managing higher mortgage costs, growing regulatory responsibilities and the expense of maintaining their properties.
“This is unlikely to encourage further investment in the private rental sector, particularly among landlords already questioning whether individual properties remain financially viable.
He added: “Our latest landlord survey, showed that almost 80% of landlords were concerned about further tax changes ahead of the Budget, and today’s announcement suggests those concerns were well founded.
“The consequences of this decision are unlikely to be felt by landlords alone, because when the costs of providing rental housing increase, there is a real likelihood that some of those costs will eventually be passed on to tenants through higher rents.
“Equally concerning is the potential impact on rental housing supply, with further taxation likely to make some landlords reconsider purchasing additional properties, while others may decide to sell existing investments. At a time when we need to encourage investment and ensure there are sufficient rental homes to meet demand, measures which risk reducing supply could ultimately make life even more difficult for tenants, particularly if fewer available properties place additional upward pressure on rents.”
Steve Cox, chief commercial officer at Fleet Mortgages, said: “The further increase in property income tax is likely to make many landlords reconsider how they hold their rental properties, particularly those with larger portfolios who may already be paying higher rates of income tax.
“Our latest Q3 Rental Barometer showed that 71% of buy-to-let mortgage applications in Q3 were made through limited companies, compared to 78% in the previous quarter, suggesting there had been some movement back towards individual borrowing.
“However, with property income tax rates now set to rise even further than previously announced, we would not be surprised to see more landlords considering whether they should continue to hold their properties in their individual names or explore instead the potential benefits of limited company ownership.”
Jeremy Leaf, north London estate agent and a former RICS residential chairman, said: “Sadly, there was nothing to encourage new landlords into the buy-to-let sector or anything to persuade others to stay invested. There is an urgent need to stem the flow of those leaving the sector or rents will keep rising and standards will keep declining.
“Hopefully, activity at the very least won’t be any worse than before, while those sitting on the fence will be persuaded to come down and get on with their moves.”
Marc von Grundherr, the director of lettings and estate agency Benham and Reeves, said: “Landlords have been kicked while they’re down once again, with the Chancellor delivering yet another blow to buy to let profitability.
“The private rented sector is already contending with higher operating costs, mounting regulatory obligations, and the financial pressures of maintaining rental homes, so a further increase in property income tax is the last thing landlords need.
“The Government cannot continue to squeeze landlords financially while expecting them to provide the homes the nation so desperately needs.
“If investment in the sector becomes increasingly unattractive, more landlords will inevitably reconsider their position, further reducing rental stock and placing additional upward pressure on rents for tenants.”
Roma Sharma, the managing director of property management specialists Rushbrook, said: “With the Government’s sustained campaign against landlords, a hit to buy to let profitability has become a frequent and almost expected feature of the Autumn Budget.
“Today’s further increase in property income tax is another blow to a sector already grappling with rising operating costs, tighter regulation, and growing financial pressures.
“The concern is that landlords can only absorb so much before difficult decisions have to be made. Whether that’s delaying essential property improvements, increasing rents where possible, or exiting the market altogether, the consequences will ultimately be felt by tenants who are already struggling with limited choice and affordability.”
186 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Next Article
Property experts slam Budget tax raid on landlords
2 weeks ago | 4 comments
2 weeks ago | 1 comments
3 weeks ago | 2 comments
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2685
2:37 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by David at 09/11/2026 – 14:17
It isn’t clear to me what the Greens stand for anymore. They used to stand for sustainability. If there is a political party out there that GENUINELY understands sustainability then the centre ground of UK politics is open to them.
Something is only sustainable if a working family in a PPR, small business or small landlord can afford to do it.
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 361
3:05 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 14:35
Yes very much so. It was all about hitting the small landlords. My high yielding student HMOs were all bought as going concerns by individuals using Ltd companies. Two went to someone who has around 60 and another two to someone with 30 plus. Apparently I was the problem holding 5 in my own name along with 9 ‘family’ homes.
What infuriated me was Osborne pontificating about the excessive use of leverage – only for his pal Jeremy Hunt to snap up 7 flats in a Ltd company (avoiding residential SDLT) all mortgaged to the hilt despite the fact that he had just sold the business he founded for £15 million. I started building my portfolio of 14 with the proceeds of the business I sold in 1990 for £75k. I was clobbered by S24 and had to watch Hunt go on to become Chancellor sporting that irritating smirk he always had.
In some ways I’m glad I started to get out in 2015. Last one to go on the market soon, REITs in an ISA each year building up nicely means property income tax free and I’ll be using discounted low coupon Gilts with no CGT for cash from now on so Healey wont be getting any significant tax from my savings let alone the 24% tax he’s expecting.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2685
3:23 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 09/11/2026 – 15:05
And if the market research that Mark Alexander carried out using Property118 subscribers is representative of the market, the big landlords are more likely to raise rent than the small landlords; so the someone with 60 properties and the other someone with 30 plus properties probably raised rents on the properties they bought from you. Between them George Osborne, Rachel Reeves and now John Healey are all raising rents and collecting 40% tax from tenants.
The really big difference though between now and 2015 is artificial intelligence available on your mobile phone, from anywhere. Ten years ago the chancellor of the day might be able to get away with the lie that he wasn’t raising rents with his tax hikes for a little while. The Office of Budget Responsibility and the Bank of England have told John Healey that raising taxes on rents will push rents up; your average tenant probably doesn’t read their announcements but if he or she plugs “what are the factors that are pushing rents up” into a mobile phone, artificial intelligence is going to tell the tenant what the factors raising rents are. The tenant is going to know that raising taxes on rents raises rents and that John Healey did it anyway. That’s very different to 2015….
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 543 - Articles: 1
4:19 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 09/11/2026 – 15:23
“,,,,, but if he or she plugs “what are the factors that are pushing rents up” into a mobile phone, artificial intelligence is going to tell the tenant what the factors raising rents are. ”
Brilliant, just done it. AI to the rescue. Lays blame fairly on government and their assaults on landlords.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2685
4:33 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by David Lawrenson at 16:19
Absolutely. The same sort of thing happens if you ask Does raising taxes on fuel i.e. raising fuel duty, raise prices for the consumer at the pumps?
That will give you something like this: Yes, raising taxes on fuel, such as fuel duty, does raise prices for consumers at the pumps. The fuel duty is a fixed tax charged per litre of petrol or diesel, and it is applied before any other calculations. When the fuel duty increases, it directly raises the price of petrol at the pump. For example, at a pump price of 148p per litre, approximately 80p is tax, which includes the 57.95p fuel duty plus around 24.7p VAT. This means that over 54% of what you pay at the pump goes directly to HMRC. Therefore, any increase in fuel duty would be noticeable in the prices consumers pay at the pump.
And it will give you a reference like this:
https://www.petrolprices.co.uk/how-much-fuel-is-taxed-uk.php
If you are down the pub with your mates wondering why you now cannot afford as much beer you can do the same thing for fuel, your rent, your cigarettes, or your pint of beer.
Now the thing with rents is that depending upon where you are in the UK your property costs could easily be 30%-50% of your income. Working families are squeezed between the costs of things like food, fuel (petrol, diesel, gas, electricity) and the taxes they pay….council tax, income tax, national insurance, employers national insurance (which squeezes you by holding your salary down). So in 2026 when the Chancellor follows Rachel Reeves with what he SAYS is a small squeeze that will not make much difference he is likely to be squeezing something that could be 50% of a working familys expenses. It is not a small squeeze at all, if you are a working family he is giving your cojones a big squeeze and he is squeezing hard because it is such a big part of your expenditure. I.e. you can find out who just s*****d you just by using your mobile phone down at the pub with your mates at the same time you are finding out how much of your pint is going to the exchequer in tax.
In 2015 you might have had the Sun, the Express or the Mail with you down at the pub to find out who just hit you: Now, with AI, you can do it in seconds with your mobile phone. John Healey is using tenants as tax collectors….and he knows that he is doing it.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 543 - Articles: 1
4:54 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 09/11/2026 – 16:33
Very well reasoned thinking there… and if the tenants cannot pay, the pressure ends up going onto taxpayers through discretionary grants and likely also housing benefit hikes.
This is the point, if we landlords don’t end up out of pocket, then it is the tenants and also in the end, often the taxpayer as a backstop who pays, as I explain here:
https://www.lettingfocus.com/blogs/2026/11/october-2026-budget-comment/
The government is creating a rod for it’s own back.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2685
5:00 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by David Lawrenson at 16:54
Of course. And it is not just down the pub where you are wondering about your beer and your ciggies…if you are at the cafe with the baby-walker, or waiting for the kids after school and you have your mobile phone with you then AI can tell you and your friends in seconds why your rent just went up. Of course your rent went up….it was 30-%-50% of your income and the chancellor John Healey just put the squeeze on it, even though he knew that as a working family, you would suffer. That is very different to 2015…for many politicians who have lied their way to the top and are still lying to stay there, AI represents a be sure your lies will find you out situation.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1533
6:01 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
There will soon come a point where the rent increase you have to add to pay the extra 4% tax will push you to a point where you will have to do MTD reporting and maybe push you into a new tax band. In this instance it won’t be worth raising the rent as the proportion going to the government in proportion to what you keep wont be worth it. This is basically an induced rent freeze. Happily I only have 2 properties ‘in my own name’ and they are held in a partnership so we can still dodge MTD for a number of years to come.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 840 - Articles: 1
9:12 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 11:30
If the Greens abolished the RRA, scrapped S24 and gave all landlord buyers a SDLT holiday it wouldn’t be any more of a deviation from the expected than Osborne’s 2015 assault on unincorporated landlords.
NOT IN THE GREENS MANIFESTO AND THE LABOUR RRA IS MUCH WORSE THAN THE TORY ONE!
I TAKE THE POINT ABOUT TORIES ABOUT I DO HEAR THEM APOLOGISING FOR PAST MISTAKES. AND I DO THINK KEMI TALKS A LOT OF SENSE GENERALLY. BEST OF A VERY BAD BUNCH!
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 361
9:18 PM, 9th November 2026, About 2 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Joe Bloggs at 09/11/2026 – 21:12
Yes, I’m very much aware of the Greens adoption of “abolish private landlords”. The anti landlord carp Osborne came out with in the July 2015 Budget (primarily S24) wasn’t in the Tory manifesto for the election they had won only weeks before! That was kinda the the point of the analogy..