Budget sees landlords facing second property tax raid

1:28 PM, 28th October 2026, 1 day ago 69
Categories:

Landlords face a second successive Budget tax raid after Chancellor John Healey announced another increase in tax on property income.

Tax rates on property and savings income will increase by a further two percentage points from April 2027, adding to the rise announced by Rachel Reeves last year.

The Office for Budget Responsibility has warned the measures risk driving landlords out of the market and pushing rents higher for tenants.

The Telegraph reports that the announcement suggests property income tax rates will reach 24% for basic-rate taxpayers, 44% for higher-rate taxpayers and 49% for those paying the additional rate. Full details have yet to be confirmed.

Landlord income focus

The move puts the taxation of landlords’ income at the centre of a Budget which also includes support for household energy bills.

Delivering his maiden Budget, Mr Healey told MPs: “I am increasing the rates of tax on income from property and savings by a further two percentage points from April 2027.

“With no change to tax on income from dividends and tax on income from employment.”

For landlords, the announcement brings a further squeeze on returns, with the precise impact depending on their circumstances and the detailed provisions.

Landlords will be less likely to enter the market

The OBR issued a scathing warning over the property tax rise, saying it risks shrinking the rental market and driving rents higher.

The OBR said: “These measures collectively risk leading to a steady rise in rents through two effects. First, potential landlords are less likely to enter the market, reducing long-run rental supply, which risks a steady long-term rise in rents if demand outstrips supply – which we think is more likely than not.

“Second, landlords are likely to pass on more of these costs to renters in the long-run through a combination of some current landlords leaving, thereby giving more price setting power to remaining landlords, and greater long-run flexibility to raise rents.

“Such rises in rents would offset at least some of the reduction in the commercial viability to landlords from the measures introduced in recent years.”

Government wants to finish sector off

Greg Tsuman, managing director for Lettings, Martyn Gerrard said the further rise “may as well criminalise’ renting out a property”.

He said: “Adding a further two per cent tax to property income on top of the previously announced two per cent is a surprising and incomprehensible decision. Last year’s Autumn Budget dealt a severe blow to the sector, but it looks like the Government wants to finish it off.

“The OBR was already warning that the level of tax being imposed on landlords was likely to drive up rents and reduce rental property supply. This is lunacy and I fear that the Government is actively trying to dismantle the PRS. At this point, the government may as well criminalise renting out a property.

“Landlords have endured successive measures against them for years and we’re already seeing an unprecedented exodus from the rental market. There was a desperate need to reassure and provide confidence. Instead, we’ll see the rush to the door intensifying. The property market is already struggling with the oversupply of rental properties being sold and we’re going to see even more downwards pressure on house prices as a result of this.”

Ben Beadle, chief executive of the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), said: “The Chancellor has today made life harder for renters right across the country.

“As the Office for Budget Responsibility has confirmed, hiking taxes will drive up rents and drive down supply in the rental market when demand is already way ahead of the number of homes available.

“How that fits with a commitment to providing households with more breathing space is anyone’s guess.”

Social and affordable housing

Elsewhere in the Budget, also confirmed that tenants in England will not face Stamp Duty Land Tax on rent under assured tenancies, following the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Act on 1 May 2026. The exemption is intended to prevent tenants from being inadvertently liable for the tax due to changes in tenancy rules.

The government also pledged a further £430m to tackle rough sleeping, on top of the £442m announced in August, taking total investment to £874m by the end of the current parliament.

The Chancellor also announced the Your First Home scheme, which aims to help 70,000 first-time buyers onto the property ladder and save them hundreds of pounds a month.

Eligible buyers will be able to purchase a home with a deposit of at least 2.5%, a repayment mortgage from a participating lender and a government equity loan worth 20% of the purchase price, interest-free for the first five years.

The Budget also includes a further £1.5bn for social and affordable housing, taking total capital investment over the next decade to more than £40bn.

Smaller housing developments on brownfield land will also be exempt from Biodiversity Net Gain requirements, in a move intended to make building cheaper and simpler.

However, the Chancellor made no mention of Local Housing Allowance meaning it remains frozen.

Industry reaction to Budget 2026

On the rise of property tax rise, Andrew Lloyd, managing director at property data firm, Search Acumen, said: “Landlords will feel an underhand blow from the Chancellor today. Raising tax rates on income from property by a further two percentage points from April 2027 is a concern for small and accidental landlords whose margins have already been eroded this year, and we will undoubtedly see this impact in supply and rents over the next year.

“Conversely, the zero-rate on land sold to social housing providers announced will help incentivise the build and supply of council homes, a much-needed win for the struggling sector.”

Tony Hall, head of business development at Saffron for Intermediaries, said: “Last year’s increase has yet to take effect, and the Chancellor has already doubled it. Raising property income tax rates to 24%, 44% and 49% from April 2027 adds yet more pressure on landlords already navigating rising costs and substantial regulatory change.

“The government describes this as fair and proportionate, but landlords will judge it against the cost of providing a home. Maintenance, repairs, safety checks and property improvements all need funding. Taking more of the income leaves less available to reinvest.

“Many landlords are already rethinking how they operate, whether through limited companies, changes to their portfolios or investment in HMOs and multi-unit blocks. These decisions require careful advice and long-term planning. Repeated tax increases make that planning harder and risk discouraging further investment.

“If the government wants more good-quality homes to rent, it needs to give landlords reasons to provide them. Squeezing rental investment further risks leaving tenants with fewer choices and higher costs.”

Rob Stanton, sales and distribution director at Landbay, said: “Having already announced a 2% increase in income tax on property income in last year’s Budget, the Government has now doubled that increase to 4%, which will take the basic rate to 24%, the higher rate to 44% and the additional rate to 49% from April 2027.

“This applies to landlords who hold their rental properties in their personal names across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, rather than those who own through limited companies, and clearly represents a significant additional tax burden at a time when landlords are already managing higher mortgage costs, growing regulatory responsibilities and the expense of maintaining their properties.

“This is unlikely to encourage further investment in the private rental sector, particularly among landlords already questioning whether individual properties remain financially viable.

He added: “Our latest landlord survey, showed that almost 80% of landlords were concerned about further tax changes ahead of the Budget, and today’s announcement suggests those concerns were well founded.

“The consequences of this decision are unlikely to be felt by landlords alone, because when the costs of providing rental housing increase, there is a real likelihood that some of those costs will eventually be passed on to tenants through higher rents.

“Equally concerning is the potential impact on rental housing supply, with further taxation likely to make some landlords reconsider purchasing additional properties, while others may decide to sell existing investments. At a time when we need to encourage investment and ensure there are sufficient rental homes to meet demand, measures which risk reducing supply could ultimately make life even more difficult for tenants, particularly if fewer available properties place additional upward pressure on rents.”

Steve Cox, chief commercial officer at Fleet Mortgages, said: “The further increase in property income tax is likely to make many landlords reconsider how they hold their rental properties, particularly those with larger portfolios who may already be paying higher rates of income tax.

“Our latest Q3 Rental Barometer showed that 71% of buy-to-let mortgage applications in Q3 were made through limited companies, compared to 78% in the previous quarter, suggesting there had been some movement back towards individual borrowing.

“However, with property income tax rates now set to rise even further than previously announced, we would not be surprised to see more landlords considering whether they should continue to hold their properties in their individual names or explore instead the potential benefits of limited company ownership.”

Jeremy Leaf, north London estate agent and a former RICS residential chairman, said: “Sadly, there was nothing to encourage new landlords into the buy-to-let sector or anything to persuade others to stay invested. There is an urgent need to stem the flow of those leaving the sector or rents will keep rising and standards will keep declining.

“Hopefully, activity at the very least won’t be any worse than before, while those sitting on the fence will be persuaded to come down and get on with their moves.”

Marc von Grundherr, the director of lettings and estate agency Benham and Reeves, said: “Landlords have been kicked while they’re down once again, with the Chancellor delivering yet another blow to buy to let profitability.

“The private rented sector is already contending with higher operating costs, mounting regulatory obligations, and the financial pressures of maintaining rental homes, so a further increase in property income tax is the last thing landlords need.

“The Government cannot continue to squeeze landlords financially while expecting them to provide the homes the nation so desperately needs.

“If investment in the sector becomes increasingly unattractive, more landlords will inevitably reconsider their position, further reducing rental stock and placing additional upward pressure on rents for tenants.”

Roma Sharma, the managing director of property management specialists Rushbrook, said: “With the Government’s sustained campaign against landlords, a hit to buy to let profitability has become a frequent and almost expected feature of the Autumn Budget.

“Today’s further increase in property income tax is another blow to a sector already grappling with rising operating costs, tighter regulation, and growing financial pressures.

“The concern is that landlords can only absorb so much before difficult decisions have to be made. Whether that’s delaying essential property improvements, increasing rents where possible, or exiting the market altogether, the consequences will ultimately be felt by tenants who are already struggling with limited choice and affordability.”


Share This Article

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1771 - Articles: 3

    12:00 PM, 29th October 2026, About 7 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 29/10/2026 – 11:18
    I didn’t think anyone could be more inept than Reeves, but at least she did work in financial services before ‘retiring’ as an MP. Healey has never had a proper job in his life, let alone one where he has to do sums. But maybe he doesn’t need to when he has lefty advisors like Torsten Bell telling him what to do.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2620

    12:20 PM, 29th October 2026, About 7 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 29/10/2026 – 12:00
    Even John Healey and Rachel Reeves knew what the return on UK government gilts was and is now…they vary at present from 4.1 to 5.7% depending upon how long you are prepared to tie your money up for. For cash held in the bank for 1-5 years the return ranges from 4.75-5.37% at the moment and both Rachel Reeves and John Healey will have known this too.

    Even before John Healey made his budget announcements the AFTER TAX return for a small investor investing in residential property was below what you could get by putting your money in the bank. He didn’t reverse George Osborne’s policy stopping small investors in property from offsetting their finance costs against rents, even though he could have done.

    Labour’s Renters Rights Act also increases risk for investors, especially when investing in property likely to be inhabited by families with children, who you might now struggle to remove if you need to since the withdrawal of no-fault evictions; I suspect that the only investment that might still make financial sense since labour came to power is investing in HMOs via a limited company, or perhaps hanging onto small numbers of properties if you ultimately intend to put your own family members back in. Labour aren’t going to build 1.5 million new homes and they don’t have the money to build significant numbers of new council houses.

    John Healey is using private rental sector tenants (including working families) as tax collectors and he knows this.

  • Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 347

    12:37 PM, 29th October 2026, About 7 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 29/10/2026 – 12:20
    Labour are just dogmatic. A while back they were saying that LLs rental ‘unearned’ income should be taxed similar to ‘earned’ income tax so carving out property income tax allows them to equalise by stealth knowing that NI could not be hammered onto retirement age LLs. These socialists know what they are doing but will just run out of spending other peoples money in 1-2 years time! NEW Conservatives need to get their deregulation and low tax policy sorted for PRS

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2620

    12:45 PM, 29th October 2026, About 7 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 29/10/2026 – 12:37
    So does any other party that genuinely understands sustainability, in the broadest sense. Clearly, that’s not labour.

  • Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1048

    4:27 PM, 29th October 2026, About 3 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 29/10/2026 – 12:00
    … that’s like promoting someone on the check-in desk to CFO.

  • Member Since June 2026 - Comments: 15

    4:45 PM, 29th October 2026, About 3 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by David at 29/10/2026 – 09:36
    I was thinking about gilts but wouldn’t put it past Labour to close the CGT loophole on this, when people start to use these more. You know, because it isn’t “fair”. They are literally blocking any way to invest your own already taxed money and look after yourself as you get older.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2620

    5:10 PM, 29th October 2026, About 2 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ana at 29/10/2026 – 16:45
    I think that’s generally true unless you put money into a limited company. Labour are doing what Gordon Brown did and what Denis Healey did before him whilst lying about the true effects of their policies. There is no coherent plan for economic growth even though that’s the only way out of the debt problem. But labour governments generally find it hard to attack limited companies en masse because it gives the game away and sends a message to the money markets and investors around the world that they are turning your country into a basket case like France today, or like Greece after the last financial crash.

  • Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 351

    5:17 PM, 29th October 2026, About 2 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ana at 16:45

    Always a risk, but I’m going to start building a holding of low coupon gilts to exploit the CGT advantage. Already got the S8 owner selling in for my last of 14. Will look at an Aston DB9 that has hit the bottom of its depreciation (I’ll enjoy it too) and put the rest in low coupon discounted gilts as I’m already using the obvious tax free routes each year from earlier sales.
    Healey ain’t getting a penny of tax on my interest going forward, sick of the procession of economic incompetents playing silly beggars with what to me is my retirement income as all I will have income wise after my rental income stops is State Pension plus a trivial workplace pension. My retirement is the net proceeds (after paying around £250k CGT) from selling off what I built up from 1990.

    Sadly, Healey is even more of a dud than Reeves.

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 674

    5:33 PM, 29th October 2026, About 2 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 29/10/2026 – 17:17
    It would be nice to sell on your terms and at top dollar rather than be forced in to it by government. At least you will hold on to your winter fuel payment now.


Related Articles