Summer Budget 2015 – Landlords Reactions

Summer Budget 2015 – Landlords Reactions

14:00 PM, 8th July 2015, About 9 years ago 9619

Text Size

Budget 2015 - Landlords Reactions

The concern is;

Budget proposals to “restrict finance cost relief to individual landlords”Summer Budget 2015 - Landlords Reactions

To calculate the impact of this policy on your personal finances download this software


Share This Article


Comments

Jim

15:05 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Hello James,
Top class post, everyone must understand that one as it is so clearly laid out.

15:20 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

In plain English: 40% tax rate payers will get a penalty of 20% of their annual mortgage interest payments. 45% tax rate payers will get a 25% penalty of total mortgage int payments. ..as they will now only be able to “benefit” from 20% tax relief max. ...as posted a few days ago!

Jack D

15:23 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "James dengel" at "12/07/2015 - 14:56":

Ahhh....got that methodology of thinking on this now, thanks to above explanation from James.

Very helpful sir!

Appalled Landlord

15:45 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Simon Dewsberry" at "12/07/2015 - 15:20":

Hi Simon

And it's not just people who currently pay at the higher rates who will be affected by the change. The interest itself, when added back to income, will turn some people from basic rate payers into higher rate payers.

Phil Landlord

16:37 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Puzzler " at "12/07/2015 - 13:45":

"Don't let the tax tail wag the business dog".

I could not disagree with you more.

I mean you are absolutely spot on.....I just need to disagree because this change affects me 🙂

Joe Bloggs

17:07 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Gary Nock" at "12/07/2015 - 14:10":

it is v confusing but i think there is a massive misconception that basic rate tax payers will not be affected...if they have mortgages then their taxable income will effectively be increased by the amount of those mortgages, pushing them into the higher rate banding or even from the lowest band to the highest if you have a lot of debt. michelle pointed this out a zillion pages earlier. this will be disastrous if my understanding is correct.

18:14 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "James dengel" at "12/07/2015 - 14:56":

The other option is to pay down some of your mortgage. A lot of working people approach buy to let as an alternative to investing for a pension. However, no other class of investing allows one to use the finance leverage as a means to offset ones tax. It was only a matter of time before the inland revenue addressed this anomaly. If one see's buy to let as a legitimate business.....then the simple solution is to structure their business as a limited company........

Barry Fitzpatrick

18:20 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Joe Bloggs" at "12/07/2015 - 17:07":

Your taxable income is increased by the amount of "mortgage interest" NOT by the mortgage debt itself. So yes it is still likely that a previously 20% rate taxpayer could be pushed into a higher tax band depending upon the mortgage and the interest rate payable.

Of course as mentioned elsewhere an interest rate rise will be for many a double whammy as not only will the Landlord have to pay the higher interest rate, but 20% or 25% of the interest as additional income tax as well. So a 1% interest rate rise actually costs 1.2% or 1.25%

Barry Fitzpatrick

18:29 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "James Tallis" at "12/07/2015 - 18:14":

This presupposes that "letting" a property is an investment rather than a business.

If there was no opportunity for capital growth then letting is a business, if the property is never let and the owner was just looking for capital growth then it is an investment, and like an investment will be taxed as a capital gain.

So if a property is bought through a limited company it can claim 100% tax relief for any interest paid, but if purchased as an individual it now only allows 20%.

This change is purely a political move to pacify Generation Rent and Shelter, and extremely clumsily implemented.

Barry Fitzpatrick

18:36 PM, 12th July 2015, About 9 years ago

Could edit the 2nd para.

Add "In reality for most Landlords it is a combination of both and will pay tax on each element of the business. This is no different from Tesco's who owns (some of0 its stores from it trades from."

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now