Better to build new homes than subsidise BTL landlords claims Housing Secretary

Better to build new homes than subsidise BTL landlords claims Housing Secretary

Hand placing a pound coin above new-build homes, illustrating Right to Buy reforms and social housing investment.
8:05 AM, 8th July 2026, 3 hours ago 4
Categories:

The government claims it’s better “to spend taxpayer’s cash building new homes than subsidising buy to let landlords”.

In a speech to the Lloyds Social Housing Forum, Housing Secretary Steve Reed claimed Right to Buy has led to taxpayers subsidising private landlords by paying housing benefit on homes that taxpayers also paid to build.

The government have announced a number of reforms to Right to Buy such as increasing the minimum eligibility period from three to ten years before tenants can apply to buy their home.

Subsidise private landlords

Mr Reed said: “There are over a million families on council housing waiting lists and we’ve seen a near-doubling of the housing benefits bill since 2010.

“Taxpayers pay tens of billions in benefits to subsidise private landlords to rent out homes that taxpayers also paid to build.

“Today, over four in ten homes sold under right-to-buy are rented out privately.  That’s the same home now rented out to tenants at twice or three times the rent compared to when it was a council home.  And taxpayers pick up the bill for the difference.

“This government has started to turn the tide. At the core of our plan is the simple common sense that it’s better to spend taxpayer’s cash building new homes than subsidising buy-to-let landlords.

“We’re radically overhauling right-to-buy to protect the social housing stock and stop newly built homes being sold off.

“To be clear again, we support the aspiration of tenants who want to own their own home, but we also support the aspiration of the million-plus people on council waiting lists to have somewhere decent where they can afford to live.”

Under the Right to Buy reforms, the government has announced that discount rules will be amended, with discounts starting at 5% of the property’s value and increasing by 1% each year up to a maximum of 15% of the property’s value or the cash cap, whichever is lower.

A 35-year exemption will also apply to new-build social homes, meaning they cannot be sold under Right to Buy until 35 years after completion.

Meeting the Decent Homes Standard by 2035

Elsewhere in the speech, Mr Reed announced the government would launch a consultation on extending the Right to Manage to housing association tenants.

It currently only applies to leaseholders and people living in council-managed homes.

Mr Reed also said the Decent Homes Standard would provide the social housing sector with long-term regulatory certainty, with both private and social landlords required to meet the standard by 2035


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 881

    9:55 AM, 8th July 2026, About 48 minutes ago

    The flaw in the logic is that actually buying new houses is expensive AND you still have to house the people you resent paying the rent for whilst building them – and with government/ local authority processes and timescales we will already have imported enough new people to fill this capacity before they have finished building.

  • Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 92

    10:10 AM, 8th July 2026, About 34 minutes ago

    Houses the taxpayer paid to build? But then they sold them and the taxpayer got money back. Hardly a valid argument.

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1254

    10:33 AM, 8th July 2026, About 10 minutes ago

    The other flaw in the argument is that housing benefit would still have to pay the rent even if they were still council owned and the council received a lump sum payment from the new owner to offset any difference in the rent.

  • Member Since August 2022 - Comments: 108

    10:41 AM, 8th July 2026, About 2 minutes ago

    I agree with Steve Reed – build more homes.

    Ahhh, hang on a minute: you have f***ed property developers as much as landlords and now no-one is building. That’s a bit of a problem, isn’t it? And now you are trying to place the blame on someone – private landlords seems like the obvious one. . And the solution, as with everything in the Labour world, will be to come up with an idiotic strangling policy to try and rectify the original idiotic policy, except it will strangle the issue even more.

    Two more years, guys. Two more long years.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles