Better to build new homes than subsidise BTL landlords claims Housing Secretary

Better to build new homes than subsidise BTL landlords claims Housing Secretary

Hand placing a pound coin above new-build homes, illustrating Right to Buy reforms and social housing investment.
8:05 AM, 8th July 2026, 4 days ago 24
Categories:

The government claims it’s better “to spend taxpayer’s cash building new homes than subsidising buy to let landlords”.

In a speech to the Lloyds Social Housing Forum, Housing Secretary Steve Reed claimed Right to Buy has led to taxpayers subsidising private landlords by paying housing benefit on homes that taxpayers also paid to build.

The government have announced a number of reforms to Right to Buy such as increasing the minimum eligibility period from three to ten years before tenants can apply to buy their home.

Subsidise private landlords

Mr Reed said: “There are over a million families on council housing waiting lists and we’ve seen a near-doubling of the housing benefits bill since 2010.

“Taxpayers pay tens of billions in benefits to subsidise private landlords to rent out homes that taxpayers also paid to build.

“Today, over four in ten homes sold under right-to-buy are rented out privately.  That’s the same home now rented out to tenants at twice or three times the rent compared to when it was a council home.  And taxpayers pick up the bill for the difference.

“This government has started to turn the tide. At the core of our plan is the simple common sense that it’s better to spend taxpayer’s cash building new homes than subsidising buy-to-let landlords.

“We’re radically overhauling right-to-buy to protect the social housing stock and stop newly built homes being sold off.

“To be clear again, we support the aspiration of tenants who want to own their own home, but we also support the aspiration of the million-plus people on council waiting lists to have somewhere decent where they can afford to live.”

Under the Right to Buy reforms, the government has announced that discount rules will be amended, with discounts starting at 5% of the property’s value and increasing by 1% each year up to a maximum of 15% of the property’s value or the cash cap, whichever is lower.

A 35-year exemption will also apply to new-build social homes, meaning they cannot be sold under Right to Buy until 35 years after completion.

Meeting the Decent Homes Standard by 2035

Elsewhere in the speech, Mr Reed announced the government would launch a consultation on extending the Right to Manage to housing association tenants.

It currently only applies to leaseholders and people living in council-managed homes.

Mr Reed also said the Decent Homes Standard would provide the social housing sector with long-term regulatory certainty, with both private and social landlords required to meet the standard by 2035


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since April 2024 - Comments: 7

    7:08 PM, 8th July 2026, About 3 days ago

    The problem is that Steve Reed has no grasp of what housing benefit is .He thinks it all goes to private landlords ,the same landlords who he say won’t take benefit tenants .housing benefit goes to all low paid people working or not who don’t get sufficient income to pay their rent ,and this applies to council tenants as well.so building more councils houses just don’t add up ,so he should be sacked ,he should read up what applicable amount is in the housing benefit forms that would make him look a complete idiot

  • Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 93

    9:44 PM, 8th July 2026, About 3 days ago

    So if you want a council property and you’re lucky enough to get one, you pay a massively subsidised rent. Yet you could have a substantial household income? Shouldn’t the rent be means-tested? If not then that’s the tax payer losing out big time. How’s that fair on anybody?

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2206

    12:14 PM, 10th July 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Neil P at 08/07/2026 – 21:44
    I have often wondered about eligibility for Council Housing. ‘Local connections’ always seem to be a big part of it.

    My family has never been able to rely on ‘local connections’ because we’ve always had to move to where the work was.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2206

    12:20 PM, 10th July 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul Goulder at 08/07/2026 – 19:08
    I think that’s part of the problem….I used to take social housing tenants, I don’t any more, and that’s because the government made them too high risk, not because I had any problem with how they lived their lives. But I think another big problem is the assumption that having councils build more council houses actually houses more people for the amount of capital put in, adjusting the existing capital investment to market value, without that assumption being tested by evidence.

    It’s a belief system…’the solution is building more council houses…” we commonly hear labour MPs say it…but where’s the evidence?

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles