10:14 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago 64
Text Size
Tenants have lost a legal challenge against a Labour-run council after they were served eviction notices to make way for homeless families.
Earlier this year, Lambeth Council decided to reclaim over 160 homes on council estates. These properties, previously rented out through the private rented sector by Homes for Lambeth, a private company wholly owned by the council, were reclassified as temporary accommodation.
As a result of the council’s actions, more than 160 families have been served Section 21 eviction notices, with residents warning this could leave them homeless despite the council’s duty to prevent homelessness.
One of the tenants applied for a Judicial Review following the council’s decision to evict private renters. However, this was refused in March, and last week a judge dismissed their appeal.
Mr Justice Linden ruled that the council had acted lawfully throughout.
Councillor Danny Adilypour, Lambeth council’s deputy leader (Housing, Investment and New Homes), welcomed the decision.
He said: “Lambeth is on the front line of a national housing crisis, and we are doing everything we can to provide the most disadvantaged and vulnerable families in Lambeth with a safe, decent home.
“It is right that we are taking back former council homes that were lost through Right to Buy. We need to use these properties to provide safe, secure homes for our most vulnerable residents in urgent need of housing, rather than leaving them to be rented on the private market to those who have the means and resources to pay market rent.”
He adds: “The number of homeless households supported by the council has increased by 50% in the last two years, and Lambeth is now providing temporary accommodation for over 4,700 homeless households every night.
“The cost of housing homeless families in overnight accommodation has risen to more than £100million a year. This is why we have to use all of the properties available to us to support these homeless households and bring these costs down.”
The Homes for Lambeth Tenants (HFL) group warns tenants threatened with homelessness due to the decision could be forced to rely on Lambeth Council for support.
Former local Green Party councillor Peter Elliot told the Big Issue: “The fact that Lambeth Council is evicting its people from its own homes is just mind-blowing for me.
“Many people have left so what’s left for Lambeth Council is really people who can’t go anywhere. They genuinely are making people homeless to house the homeless.”
Homes for Lambeth also points out that it is the council’s legal duty to prevent homelessness.
In a statement on Instagram, HFL tenants said: “Most of HFL tenants, who are currently being served eviction notices by a ‘private company’ set up and fully owned by Lambeth Council, will have a duty to be housed by the very same council.
“The technical ruling on whether the council should have rented homes ‘privately’ in the first place does not mean that the council’s decisions are fair or ethical. Merely because something is deemed to be legal does not automatically make it just.”
The group adds that they will continue to fight for justice after the ruling.
The group says on their social media page: “The judge did not find in our favour. Still, we remain committed to fighting for each of our tenants and ensuring that we are not made homeless.
“We recognise that we should have never been put in this situation, especially by a local authority whose legal duty it is to prevent homelessness, yet here we are. And we are determined to persevere.”
Previous Article
Council hits landlords with £1.5m in fines
Cider Drinker
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up8:12 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
The tenants must stay in their homes until physically removed by bailiffs. They need to group together and support each other and to prevent evictions.
This is nothing less than outrageous persecution. The housing crisis is not the tenants’ fault. Making a family homeless to house a homeless family from the waiting list does nothing to fix the problem of homelessness.
A Reader
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up9:38 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
What absolutely insane dim thinking by a council - but not surprising.
Dylan Morris
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:09 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
It’s to house the fighting age men.
Gromit
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:13 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 25/06/2025 - 08:12
... It makes their stats/headlines look good "the Council has provided another 160 homeless families with homes"
paul kaye
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:16 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
Perhaps it is a case that, if the present tenant can afford to go private, they should.
Many people in council properties have good jobs and are earning a good income, basically having a laugh
at the council's expense??????????????????
Julian Lloyd
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:23 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Dylan Morris at 25/06/2025 - 10:09
This country is NUTS! What are we doing to ourselves?
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:24 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
this is absolutely hilarious! The Council clearly changed/made sure the housing was classed as 'temporary' as that means tenants are on a licence. Easier to evict.....
Julian Lloyd
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:26 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by paul kaye at 25/06/2025 - 10:16
That’s probably right. I have heard stories of high ranking Union bosses clinging to their council houses despite being on 80k Pa. Plus is Arthur Scargill still living in the NCB owned property in the Barbican? We only have about 2000 miners left in the country!
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:27 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
so if they are evicting temp licenced tenants, why are they serving S21's?
Are they giving the new incoming ones a licence or an AST?
A Reader
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:28 AM, 25th June 2025, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by paul kaye at 25/06/2025 - 10:16
But it is not the tenants fault that the council ran a PRS scheme and are now recinding on that arrangement.