Tenants Charter – Mr Pickles, have you gone completely mad?

Tenants Charter – Mr Pickles, have you gone completely mad?

11:16 AM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago 67

Text Size

Tenants Charter

Open Letter to Mr Eric Pickles – Communities Secretary – re Tenants Charter

Dear Mr Pickles

Have you gone completely mad?

I am reading in The Times Newspaper today that you are to announce a “Tenants Charter” which will allow tenants to demand two to five year tenancy agreements.

Do you realise that most buy to let mortgage borrowers would be in default of their mortgage contracts if they were to offer tenancy agreements with fixed terms longer than 6 or 12 months?

Do you realise that most modern leases (e.g leasehold flats) contain conditions on subletting not exceeding 12 months in term?

There is a very good reason why mortgage lenders have these conditions in their mortgages. It is because it is so difficult to obtain possession when a tenant reneges on a contract. Bad payers are regularly getting away with up to 5 months of rent free living. Theoretically a landlord can apply to obtain possession by serving two weeks notice once a tenant is two or months in arrears on rent. However, after that 10 weeks has expired it can take several months to get a Court date. Even when a possession order has been granted it then takes several more weeks before bailiffs can be appointed to enforce the order. If you want landlords and mortgage lenders to provide greater security of tenure to tenants then you are going to have to sort out the possession rules for landlords first.

Section 21 of the housing act transformed the UK Private Rented Sector which was in rapid decline until the 1988 act was introduced. Forcing landlords to offer long term tenancy agreements will force the PRS back into the dark ages and reduce incentive for further investment into the sector.

Does Government not recognise the need for a healthy PRS?

Does government not realise that a huge sector of the working population rely on the housing flexibility the PRS provides in terms of job mobility?

Do you have any idea of how your speech today could destabilise the Private Rented Sector?

I totally understand that good tenants, particularly young families with children of school age, need a fair deal and it cuts both ways in that most landlords want good tenants to stay long term. It makes economic sense for landlords to have quality long term tenants,

So why have you not even considered promoting the Deed of Assurance?

Perhaps you are unaware of the effectiveness and simplicity?

A Deed of Assurance is a document in which a landlord promises to pay an agreed level of compensation to a tenant if possession is obtained within a given time period. 

A Deed of Assurance is a relatively simple legal agreement which sits alongside an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement “AST”. It is a separate agreement between landlord and tenant which does not affect the landlords rights to serve notice or to obtain possession, therefore it does not affect the rights of a mortgage lender either. However, it does offer tenants peace of mind.

From a tenants point of view, a Deed of Assurance provides far more flexibility than a long term tenancy because they are only tied in for 6 months and can then move on if they need to. What a Deed of Assurance offers in addition to an AST is peace of mind.

The compensation amount offered by the landlord is negotiable but obviously the idea is to agree something which is meaningful to both parties. For example, I offer to pay anything between £1,000 and £5,000 compensation if I obtain possession within the agreed period, providing the tenancy conditions have been observed impeccably by the tenant of course. If tenants fail to pay rent on time or breaches other contractual terms within the tenancy agreement their right to claim compensation for being evicted during the Deed of Assurance is forfeited. I have been offering a Deed of Assurance to my tenants for a few years now and I am delighted to report that my relationships with new tenants have never been better.

I do not expect a reply from you Mr Pickles but I do hope you will consider the implications of acting on the advice of the people who have been influencing you up to this point.

Yours sincerely

 

Mark Alexander


Share This Article


Comments

Conrad Vink

15:24 PM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Mark Alexander" at "01/10/2013 - 14:50":

Mark - Hopefully the growing size of the private rented sector will force politicians to give these issues some much-needed attention instead of solely obsessing about owner occupation.

15:44 PM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago

all this, although interesting, is pointless as the majority of leases on houses and flats built in the last ten years do not permit AST of longer than one year.

Conrad Vink

15:49 PM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by " " at "01/10/2013 - 15:44":

Parliament is sovereign; if the legislation changes, private contracts will have to change to comply.

Jon Dahms

16:11 PM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago

The Private Rented Sector is filling an important void, effectively privatising the work Councils used to do. I wonder whether we should do an FOI request to find out how many MP's are landlords or sit on the boards of Housing Associations? Tenants can be an absolute nightmare. We have already seen the chaos and hassle wrought by deposit protection rules (well-meant but badly considered legislation) and now this? The Deed of Assurance is a great option and I will look to offer this to people who want long term lets. Some of my tenants have been with me nearly ten years on trust alone!

Romain Garcin

17:17 PM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Conrad Vink" at "01/10/2013 - 14:42":

"Another possibility would be asymmetric tenancies in which tenants could give notice during the fixed period but landlords could not so long as the tenant was meeting their obligations."

That's one for legal experts, but IMHO this is possible with the current legal framework.

Steven Burnell

18:36 PM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago

Technical Query: is page3 a replication of page2 or just my browser?

On Topic: If quid pro quo of this proposal is that landlords get much faster & more far more reliable route to repossession then local authorities will need to be more proactive in housing evicted tenants promptly or guarantee landlord that rent will be paid for any tenants on benefits (not current political trend) thereby leaving only the likes of bad behaviour as grounds for eviction?

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

18:40 PM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Steven Burnell" at "01/10/2013 - 18:36":

Technical - page two and page three comments are definitely different, the original article always sits above comments regardless of the number of pages.
.

23:44 PM, 1st October 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Conrad Vink" at "01/10/2013 - 12:05":

Well said.

Tenants in the PST in Switzerland where I have just return from living in for three years have much greater rights than they do here. As a result most people are happier renting a property as they have all the security they need without the hassle of owning a home. A landlord cannot raise your rent once you move into a property unless he undertakes major refurbishment. And even then....only by a reasonable amount. As a result most tenants are happy to stay put rather than end up paying higher rents elsewhere when they move. Having tenants that stay put for longer periods of time is better for everyone! Laws are slanted too much in favour of landords in the UK.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

7:28 AM, 2nd October 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "James Tallis" at "01/10/2013 - 23:44":

That's a brave statement to make on a Landlords Forum James as most landlords feel very differently. To an extent I agree with you.

Please tell me, what are the consequences of rent arrears or other breaches of contract in Switzerland?

The reason I ask is that most landlords in the UK find this aspect of the law most unpalatable.

In the USA the Sheriffs department will take swift and decisive action if a tenant breaches contract. In the UK we are just fobbed off with "it's a civil matter".
.
.

Jacky Peacock

10:44 AM, 2nd October 2013, About 11 years ago

Perhaps Mark Alexander should first check the facts. I have not read the Times article but I have read the Press Release from Eric Pickles. This states that tenants will be given the right to 'ask' for longer lets, not to 'demand' them. My reaction was 'No change there then'. Tenants can, of course, ask for a longer let now. Most landlords would be likely to refuse. But in practice, of course, tenants in high demand areas like London would not ask at all, just as they do not ask to see the EPC or the Gas Safety Record and do not question unfair terms in their tenancy agreement. In short, Eric Pickles' announcement is unlikely to have any impact while the PRS remains an almost wholly unregulated sellers' market.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now