Tenants can challenge pet refusals in court ahead of Ombudsman

Tenants can challenge pet refusals in court ahead of Ombudsman

Tenants with pets face rental rejection as landlord enforces no-pets policy in court setting
11:07 AM, 7th April 2026, 2 days ago 7

The government has admitted it has not carried out an impact assessment for tenants challenging pet refusals ahead of the Ombudsman coming into effect.

However, in response to a written question, Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook confirmed that tenants will be able to challenge their landlord in court if they believe a refusal to allow a pet is unreasonable.

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, tenants have the right to reasonably request a pet, and landlords cannot unreasonably refuse permission.

Challenge decision in court

The Private Rented Sector Ombudsman will be mandatory for landlords once it comes into effect and is designed to resolve disputes between tenants and private landlords without going to court.

Labour MP Kim Leadbeater asked the government what mechanisms would be available for tenants to challenge unreasonable refusals to keep a pet before the Ombudsman is operational.

Mr Pennycook said: “In implementation Phase 2, from late 2026, we will introduce the national Private Rented Sector Database and Private Rented Sector Ombudsman.

“Prior to the establishment of the new service, if a tenant believes their landlord has unreasonably refused a request to keep a pet, they will be able to challenge the decision in court.

“My Department has made no specific assessment of the impact on tenants during the period between 1 May 2026 and when the new service becomes available.”

Case-by-case basis

The government has released more detailed guidance for landlords on handling tenant requests to keep pets.

Landlords are required to consider each request on a case-by-case basis. Once a tenant submits a request, the landlord has 28 days to respond in writing. If the landlord does not respond within this period, the tenant may apply to the court.

Landlords may request additional information about the pet, such as its size, but this must be done within the initial 28-day period. Once the tenant provides the requested information, the landlord then has seven days to issue a final decision.

A landlord may refuse a tenant’s request to keep a pet in certain circumstances. These include if another tenant has an allergy (though the guidance does not specify that a landlord’s own allergy counts as grounds for refusal), if the property is too small for a large pet or multiple pets, if the pet is illegal to own, or if a leaseholder’s freeholder does not allow pets.

However, the government guidance says landlords cannot refuse a request if they do not like pets, have had issues with tenants who had pets in the past, or had previous tenants with pets who caused damage to the property.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 365

    12:32 PM, 7th April 2026, About 2 days ago

    So M’Lord my client has a toy poodle, exhibit A and the property is a 1 bed flat, so landlord loses. Tenant then brings in a German Sheppard.
    Pennycook and Co bend over backwards for tenants yet it never seems enough to satisfy them.I sincerely hope they all reap what they sow.

  • Member Since September 2022 - Comments: 40

    4:27 PM, 7th April 2026, About 2 days ago

    I’ll make all tenants aware that I don’t want dogs in my property, anybody challenging that will no longer enjoy the cheap rent they have at the moment.

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 365

    6:52 PM, 7th April 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by John Bentley at 07/04/2026 – 16:27
    Very good response to this nonsense

  • Member Since April 2026 - Comments: 1

    5:02 PM, 8th April 2026, About 20 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by David at 07/04/2026 – 12:32
    If the government are going to go guarantor and cover the cost of recarpeting, fumigating and loss of rent while this takes place as I’m sure they will then no problem

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5

    10:49 AM, 9th April 2026, About 3 hours ago

    so, if T asks for a pet on 2nd May and it is refused (reasonably or not), until the PS Ombudsman is on place, they don’t actually have anywhere at the moment to submit a challenge other than court? Is that likely? The judge will not have any of the (apparent) training that the PSO would? Which court – surely this is a civil matter and the person bringing the claim (T) has to prove harm/hardship or a loss and that the LL was ‘unreasonable’?

  • Member Since October 2025 - Comments: 3

    11:01 AM, 9th April 2026, About 2 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by David at 07/04/2026 – 12:32
    Im afraid no one is going to bully me into imposing their pets on my properties.If it came to it I would sell up and take the loss on the year relet ban.I will simply recoup a little by puttting rents up on my other properties.I own the property,I set the rules

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1137

    11:24 AM, 9th April 2026, About 2 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 09/04/2026 – 10:49
    The court will just apply the law. The Govt has made clear what they think constitutes a reasonable refusal and judges are very experienced in applying the reasonableness test. It will be for the landlord to prove they acted reasonably, not the other way around.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles