5 months ago
Landlords across England are still reluctant to advertise homes as pet friendly, even as the Renters’ Rights Act gets closer, research reveals.
According to Inventory Base, just 8.2% of rental properties are currently marketed as welcoming pets.
The inspection and compliance technology firm says that represents an annual rise of 0.6% since January 2025.
The firm’s operations director, Sián Hemming-Metcalfe, said: “Despite the Renters’ Rights Act significantly strengthening tenants’ ability to keep pets, this data shows that landlords are yet to meaningfully adapt, with pet-friendly listings increasing only marginally.
“This suggests many are either taking a wait-and-see approach or haven’t fully prepared for the changes ahead.
“As the Act makes it harder to refuse pet requests or regain possession where pets are kept, landlords now need to prepare for the fact that more and more tenants are going to be pet owners.”
She added: “As such, landlords must start focusing on protecting themselves against any financial costs this could possibly create.”
Among the solutions is for landlords to have accurate inventories to prove pet damage and carry out regular inspections.
Regional data shows the North East has the highest share of pet-friendly listings at 11.5%.
In the South West, pets are allowed in 9.1% of advertised homes.
London sits slightly above the national average with 8.8%, followed by the South East at 8.6% and the North West at 8.5%.
However, the East Midlands remains the least accommodating region with 5.6% of listings there allowing pets.
The findings come as the Renters’ Rights Act is set to reshape how landlords deal with pet requests.
From 1 May, tenants in the private rented sector will gain a legal right to ask permission to keep a pet.
This right will be implied in all tenancy agreements, even where contracts are silent on the issue.
Landlords will no longer be able to issue blanket refusals or decline requests without justification.
Any rejection must be reasonable and set out in writing, with examples including insufficient space for a large animal.
Tenants will need to submit requests in writing, describing the pet they wish to keep, while landlords will have 28 days to respond.
The Act also removes Section 21 evictions, making it more difficult to regain possession where a tenant is keeping a pet without consent.
Landlords will need clear evidence that an animal has been kept at the property, which may be challenging in practice.
Where damage has occurred, eviction may still be pursued under grounds 13 or 15, which relate to deterioration of the property or its contents.
However, landlords will not be allowed to charge higher rent or additional fees specifically because a tenant has a pet.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Council offers cash to free up rented family homes
5 months ago
7 months ago | 7 comments
7 months ago | 17 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2002 - Articles: 21
10:36 AM, 28th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Landlords should be aware that it will still be legal to advertise: “No pets” and to refuse a prospective tenant who has a pet. They will not be able to refuse unreasonably if the tenant asks after the tenancy has begun.
Before the tenancy is signed it will not be unlawful to ask: “Do you now have a pet?” and ” Do you intend to acquire a pet in the future?”
Landlords will need to consider a tenant’s request on its merits, taking account of the property and the animal. A request to keep a large dog in a 3rd floor one bedroom flat can and should be treated differently from a request to keep such a dog in a house with a garden in the countryside. A request to keep a neutered cat in the one bedroom flat may require the landlord to accept.
A landlord’s personal dislike of any animal is irrelevant.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3538 - Articles: 5
11:53 AM, 28th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 28/01/2026 – 10:36
I will continue to advertise No pets even after 1st May.
I will ask the T to confirm again before any tenancy is signed that they do not have any pets and they were fully aware of my position on this.
Like you say Ian, if the T then asks permission AFTER the tenancy started, then I will first refer them to the fact that they confirmed that before the tenancy was offered there was a not pet policy and they were fully aware of this and they freely and willingly entered the tenancy on this basis.
Surely any changes to a TA (to include in this case to allow permission for a pet) fully warrant a tenancy amendment to be made – precisely because a fundamental change proposed.
In such events, all proposed changes have to be risk assessed. In this case the risk involves the potential for unknown damage and cost.
It would therefore be reasonable to require risk mitigation, but as a request for a specific pet deposit/increase to an existing deposit nor a increase in rent can be legally asked/required/accepted to offset the risk, then it is more than reasonable for the LL to ask to suggest the use of a guarantor be required in this circumstance.
Should the T not be able to provide one, then the LL cannot be obligated to agree to an amendment to be made to the TA – ergo any pet that is then brought into the property by the T is in breach of the existing TA as no permission has been gained.
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 782
1:40 PM, 28th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 28/01/2026 – 11:53
Breaches of the tenancy agreement are totally allowed by tenants and fully punishable if landlords do the same.
I suspect it would be impossible to get a judge to agree such a breach was sufficient grounds for an eviction.