9 months ago | 9 comments
Despite pledging to ban no-fault evictions on day one of a Labour government, new figures reveal 11,400 households were removed by bailiffs due to Section 21.
According to figures from the Ministry of Justice, 30,000 Section 21 no-fault eviction notices were issued by private landlords in England during July 2024 and June 2025, meaning around 38% of notices resulted in actual enforced evictions.
However, the data does not include tenants who moved out voluntarily.
A property lawyer says the figures show landlords in London continue to evict at a higher rate due to exiting the market.
According to the Ministry of Justice, the 12 months since Labour came into government, no-fault evictions by bailiffs in England have risen by 8%.
Housing charity Shelter, claims through their analysis of the figures for every month the government delays a ban on no-fault evictions, nearly 1,000 (950) households could be removed from their homes by bailiffs.
Mairi MacRae, director of campaigns and policy at Shelter, said: “It is unconscionable that more than a year after the government came to power, thousands of renters continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs because of an unfair policy that the government said would be scrapped immediately.
“For far too long, tenants’ lives have been thrown into turmoil by the rank injustice of no fault evictions. At the whim of private landlords, thousands of tenants are being left with just two months to find a new home, plunging them into a ruthless rental market and leaving many exposed to the riptide of homelessness.”
Ms MacRae adds: “The Renters’ Rights Bill will overhaul a broken system and usher in a long-overdue era of stability and security for tenants. To curb record homelessness and ensure renters can live free from the threat of no-fault eviction, the government must deliver on this commitment, pass the bill, and name an implementation date when Section 21 will finally be scrapped.”
Despite Shelter’s claim Section 21 evictions are one of the leading causes of homelessness, new government data suggests landlords are not to blame for rising homelessness.
However, property litigation lawyer David Smith claims the figures reveal that, despite a fall in overall possession claims, landlords, particularly in London, are continuing to evict at a high rate, often to exit the market.
He said: “While total possession claims have actually fallen for the third consecutive quarter, the median time for landlords to regain possession has risen yet again. It is taking almost three extra weeks in most cases, with no sign of real progress in tackling the court delays that continue to plague the system.
“No-fault evictions (Section 21) remain a flashpoint, with bailiff-led repossessions up 8% in Labour’s first year, despite the Renters’ Rights Bill being in its final stages. This is because although the number of possession claims have fallen, a higher number are leading to possession orders as landlords in London continue to evict at a high rate, presumably to exit the market.”
He adds: “The government’s view is that most accelerated possession claims will disappear once Section 21 goes, but in my view, we will simply see a sharp increase in other types of possession claims, which will in turn lengthen delays further.
“With private rental sector supply flat, there is an urgent need to restore landlord confidence. Court bottlenecks, longer timelines, and an uncertain regulatory horizon will not achieve that. Without that confidence, tenants will ultimately feel the impact through reduced availability and higher rents.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
9 months ago | 9 comments
10 months ago | 14 comments
9 months ago | 19 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1647 - Articles: 3
5:56 PM, 15th August 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ross Tulloch at 15/08/2025 – 17:40
I went down the S8 route for 6 months arrears, when I could have used S21, but I was using a specialist eviction company and there must have been a reason.
Member Since February 2018 - Comments: 627
10:40 AM, 16th August 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 15/08/2025 – 10:38
Most large ‘charities’ and pressure groups are scams or political ‘fronts’ for others.
Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 2
4:19 PM, 16th August 2025, About 9 months ago
Shelter and consecutive governments have created this situation. To stay in the rental market means punitive costs in the next few years.
Local council licensing will probably cost
lots, plus all the compliance issues. My local council dont even know the laws about property standards. Epc issues will also ramp costs up, plus giving 3 monthe notice. All this crazy stuff has meant that we make less profit, and will sell up, as I have done. Not worth the trouble. Get out now!!
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3550 - Articles: 5
4:57 PM, 16th August 2025, About 9 months ago
even if S21 is banned tomorrow, there is a court backlog still in effect to get through so evictions due to S21 will continue for some time yet.
If LL are looking to sell, then S8 can and still will be used regardless, so EVICTIONS will still happen only this time the exact reason will be given and known.
‘evictions’ will neither be saved or reduced therefore – because every single one will have a legal and justifiable reason for it (as the majority of S21’s were issued were for in the first place).
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1647 - Articles: 3
5:33 PM, 16th August 2025, About 9 months ago
I am concerned the government could make the law on s21 retrospective. I would put nothing past this bunch of deceitful b*s*a**s!
Member Since April 2022 - Comments: 132
11:38 AM, 17th August 2025, About 9 months ago
Make it unprofitable and high risk to be a landlord and then act confused as to why landlords want to sell up. So damn frustrating, for those of us that ran our portfolios properly.
My only s21 was actually for several thousand in rent arrears and a trashed house and given that Shelter advised those tenants to stay and to try to sue me, because “there is always something you can sue a landlord for” Shelter must be well aware that s21s have always been far from no fault or a landlord’s whim.