4 months ago | 6 comments
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has warned court capacity could be overwhelmed by the Renters’ Rights Act.
In a letter to the Justice Select Committee, NRLA chief executive Ben Beadle pointed out that landlords are having to wait weeks for court hearings to regain possession of their properties.
With three months to go until the Renters’ Rights Act comes into force, the association is urging the government to do more to prepare the courts.
According to government statistics, it now takes an average of over 34 weeks between a landlord making a claim to the courts to possess a property under the grounds-based Section 8 process and a property being repossessed, the highest level in four years.
Mr Beadle points out that industry experts, including the Master of the Rolls, who oversees the operation of the civil courts, have warned that abolishing Section 21 “will undoubtedly create more contested possession cases than we have had hitherto” and expressed concern about how prepared the county courts are to handle an increase in cases.
In a letter to the Justice Select Committee, Mr Beadle warns that the government has not provided clarity on how the courts will be prepared for the digital possession process.
He said: “At Report Stage of the Renters’ Rights Act, the Housing Minister told the Commons that: “Court readiness is essential to the successful operation of the new system”. We agree with the Minister.
“However, the government has yet to define what it means by the courts being “ready”. Without that clarity, it is unclear what the planned digitisation of possession cases is intended to deliver or how success will be measured.
“More broadly, whilst the Master of the Rolls has indicated that the “first iteration” of the new digital platform to process possession cases is expected to be released in late Spring 2026, it remains unclear what this will look and feel like in practice for tenants and landlords, or the extent to which it will speed up the processing of legitimate possession claims.”
Mr Beadle says the government is sending contradictory messages over tribunal data, claiming it will intervene if the Tribunal becomes overwhelmed while admitting it lacks the basic information to make that assessment.
He explains: “In response to a recent written question from Lord Carter of Haslemere (HL10508), the Minister reaffirmed that the government would use the proposed safeguard in the Act “if the Tribunal appears at risk of being overwhelmed by a sharp increase in challenges” and that this would be subject to the affirmative procedure.
“However, in reply to a related written question (HL10509), the Justice Minister, Baroness Levitt, stated that HM Courts & Tribunals Service does not hold data on the average time for the First- tier Tribunal Property Chamber to consider, process and rule upon rent appeal cases, and that such data could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
“This creates an obvious tension. Ministers have said the government will intervene if the Tribunal becomes overwhelmed, which the Master of the Rolls has warned is very possible.
“However, the Ministry of Justice does not hold the basic data needed to assess the current caseload or to define what level of increase would constitute the Tribunal being ‘overwhelmed’. Without this information, it is difficult to see how the government can effectively determine when the new powers should be exercised.”
The NRLA is calling on the Justice Select Committee to question the government for more clarity on how the courts will be prepared for the new system.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
We are feeling SO trapped?
4 months ago | 6 comments
11 months ago | 1 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2022 - Comments: 89
9:30 AM, 19th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Given this Government’s record, do we really believe there is any attempt to recognise that the courts are simply not ready for the RRA and do we really believe the Government is bothered?
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 372
9:46 AM, 19th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Hahaha, the government will intervene will it when they should have sorted all this before enabling the Act.Perhaps they will U turn. Also isn’t waiting weeks an understatement, more like months going on years.
On top of this we have Robert Jenrick the landlord’s friend (not) from the last anti landlord party joining Reform.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1581
9:50 AM, 19th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Government policy is to delete private landlords.
A weak NRLA is part of the problem.
OR
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 754
11:10 AM, 19th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Pennycook is denying there’s a LLs exodus, despite the data, just as he’s ignoring the problem regarding the Courts. Nothing this government says to ‘reassure’ us (paper over the cracks) can be believed.
The lengthier the eviction process, the longer the government hangs onto its money and alternative housing, whilst LLs foot the bill meantime.
Member Since October 2019 - Comments: 398
12:28 PM, 19th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Are court delays manipulated by the government – court delays equal less homelessness (tenants) to deal with, simple???
Member Since August 2015 - Comments: 226
1:13 PM, 19th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Is this a retrospective feeble attempt by the NRLA to justify the lack of action to make the government disclose their impact assessment of this legislation upon the courts. The government refused to disclose the assessment when the Act was a Bill, what makes you think they will be more forthcoming or supportive now. The NRLA should have pursued the issue at the debating stage.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1998 - Articles: 21
3:40 PM, 19th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by at 19/01/2026 – 13:13
To be fair to the NRLA, this Government was never going to delay because of difficulties in landlords obtaining possession. They rejected every amendment to the RRA proposed by the Lords. Even if NRLA did pursue the point (and they may have done so behind the scenes), the Act was going to be rammed through. At least we have until May 1st. FWIW landlords can pursue Money Claims Online if tenants default on rental payments.
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 372
5:29 PM, 19th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by LaLo at 19/01/2026 – 12:28
Very good point
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 357
9:02 AM, 20th January 2026, About 3 months ago
The NRLA were well aware of the state and delays in the Scottish first tier tribunal system. Almost immediately it fell into a back log in eviction many landlords waiting a year just to find out if they could go forward to an actual eviction hearing.
Then it or was further delay to hearing. Then any excuse to kick the case out.
Tenants asking for further time .
Several cases took 2 years 8 months to get eviction order then tenant still given a month to appeal.
Even though the FTT knew no rent was being paid and damaged was being caused.
One of these cases the landlord contacted the FTT at the 2 year stage to say can he take his property back as tenant had a council house across the street .
He had her on video screaming abuse saying she would cost him every penny she could and would not hand the keys back.
This was a fully new refurb she got . It was wrecked .
And yet the government and FTT do nothing to curb this behaviour.
There is no complaints procedure against the FTT. So no redress for their failings.
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 372
10:02 AM, 20th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Neil Robb at 20/01/2026 – 09:02
Tantamount to criminal action by the tenant and the FTT complicit. Interesting in that one of the reasons put forward for selective licensing is tackling anti social behavior so one rule for landlords and another for tenants, all very just, as usual.