4 months ago | 6 comments
The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has warned court capacity could be overwhelmed by the Renters’ Rights Act.
In a letter to the Justice Select Committee, NRLA chief executive Ben Beadle pointed out that landlords are having to wait weeks for court hearings to regain possession of their properties.
With three months to go until the Renters’ Rights Act comes into force, the association is urging the government to do more to prepare the courts.
According to government statistics, it now takes an average of over 34 weeks between a landlord making a claim to the courts to possess a property under the grounds-based Section 8 process and a property being repossessed, the highest level in four years.
Mr Beadle points out that industry experts, including the Master of the Rolls, who oversees the operation of the civil courts, have warned that abolishing Section 21 “will undoubtedly create more contested possession cases than we have had hitherto” and expressed concern about how prepared the county courts are to handle an increase in cases.
In a letter to the Justice Select Committee, Mr Beadle warns that the government has not provided clarity on how the courts will be prepared for the digital possession process.
He said: “At Report Stage of the Renters’ Rights Act, the Housing Minister told the Commons that: “Court readiness is essential to the successful operation of the new system”. We agree with the Minister.
“However, the government has yet to define what it means by the courts being “ready”. Without that clarity, it is unclear what the planned digitisation of possession cases is intended to deliver or how success will be measured.
“More broadly, whilst the Master of the Rolls has indicated that the “first iteration” of the new digital platform to process possession cases is expected to be released in late Spring 2026, it remains unclear what this will look and feel like in practice for tenants and landlords, or the extent to which it will speed up the processing of legitimate possession claims.”
Mr Beadle says the government is sending contradictory messages over tribunal data, claiming it will intervene if the Tribunal becomes overwhelmed while admitting it lacks the basic information to make that assessment.
He explains: “In response to a recent written question from Lord Carter of Haslemere (HL10508), the Minister reaffirmed that the government would use the proposed safeguard in the Act “if the Tribunal appears at risk of being overwhelmed by a sharp increase in challenges” and that this would be subject to the affirmative procedure.
“However, in reply to a related written question (HL10509), the Justice Minister, Baroness Levitt, stated that HM Courts & Tribunals Service does not hold data on the average time for the First- tier Tribunal Property Chamber to consider, process and rule upon rent appeal cases, and that such data could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
“This creates an obvious tension. Ministers have said the government will intervene if the Tribunal becomes overwhelmed, which the Master of the Rolls has warned is very possible.
“However, the Ministry of Justice does not hold the basic data needed to assess the current caseload or to define what level of increase would constitute the Tribunal being ‘overwhelmed’. Without this information, it is difficult to see how the government can effectively determine when the new powers should be exercised.”
The NRLA is calling on the Justice Select Committee to question the government for more clarity on how the courts will be prepared for the new system.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
We are feeling SO trapped?
4 months ago | 6 comments
12 months ago | 1 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 123
1:12 PM, 20th January 2026, About 4 months ago
A short term win for the government.
Loads of tenants getting free rent for a year keeping homeless statistics lower. They are just crossing their fingers that the courts can tie up these claims until after an election. The final outcome, tenants with CCJ’s, who made themselves homeless through breach of contract, the council’s can wash their hands of.
Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 206
4:45 PM, 20th January 2026, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Freda Blogs at 19/01/2026 – 11:10
There are also going to be a lot of empty properties. Sellers getting their properties empty so they can sell them to the owner occupiers.
So there will not be many properties available for the tenants to move in.
Government talks about low cost housing, when would they get there.
Builders going bankrupt and don’t wish to work with this government. They don’t understand the figures, all the costing of material,labour and logistics.
Landlords have similar costings of materials, maintenance, licences, compliance, she on MTD software, PRS database, ombudsman fees etc.
They need to do a uturn for everyone sake.
Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 206
5:09 PM, 20th January 2026, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Jack Jennings at 20/01/2026 – 13:12
There are also tenants who don’t care about the CCJ.
I had a case where I took the tenants to court, won, bailiff were sent ended with 10 months non payment and then they came to damage the property on the outside.
Polic were involved but lack of evidence, though the neighbours knew by watching them and cctv camera and phoned me but they did not wish to continue me to court or give the cctv tapes to the police.
The tenants just said before the court case that they don’t care about the CCJ as they were getting universal credit.
It took sometime before they were housed.
Some tenants don’t care about getting CCJs anyway.
Courts will take a long time, anything between 6 to 14 months and then waiting time for them to leave or subsequently bailiffs. It is a very long and ardent procedure to get the property back.
It needs to be a fair process of no rent for 2 months, no paying tenants are out.
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 387
5:11 PM, 20th January 2026, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Tiger at 20/01/2026 – 16:45
Next move by councils will be EDMO’s to take over properties empty over 6 months, so in effect they rehouse the tenant using the ex landlord’s property.