Landlords: Email or post this letter to your MP about the disastrous Renters’ Rights Bill TODAY!

Landlords: Email or post this letter to your MP about the disastrous Renters’ Rights Bill TODAY!

9:06 AM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago 20

Text Size

Categories:

All private landlords know that Labour’s Renters’ Rights Bill will be a nightmare for tenants, and now it’s about to leave the Lords and go back to the Commons for a final vote. It’s not too late to have your voice heard! We MUST work together and ensure that MPs understand the unintended consequences of this poor legislation.

The big issue is that Labour is desperate for a positive headline, and what’s better than dangling ‘tenant protections’ in front of voters?

There’s just one problem: this Bill will hit tenants harder than any landlord ever could. It’s time to grab your pens, fire up your emails and send a letter to your MP – because if this bill passes, the fallout will be on them, and they need to hear it now.

Let’s cut through the spin. The Renters’ Rights Bill sounds noble, but it’s a masterclass in unintended outcomes. There’s so much to criticise (see my previous articles!), but here’s a quick run down on some of the more egregious examples.

Rent control fiasco

By banning offers above advertised rent, it forces landlords to list properties at the maximum market rate. No more holding rents down to secure long-term tenants or avoid voids – Scotland’s rent control fiasco already proved that landlords can, and will, max out rents when squeezed.

Add to that the tax rules blocking small-portfolio landlords from offsetting finance costs against rents, and the crippling costs of upgrading properties to EPC Band C or above (which, without a cap on costs, means spending £20-£50K per property).

The numbers don’t add up, so what do we do? We sell. We exit. And we’re already doing it, despite the Housing Minister’s bizarre claim that there’s ‘no evidence’ of this.

Fewer landlords mean fewer rental homes so tenants will face rocketing rents – don’t be surprised if they end up paying 50% of their wages, not 30%.

Also, be prepared for landlords being reluctant to sign up to the proposed landlord database with lots of personal information that means some tenants can abuse them. It’s no surprise either that there’s no mention of a database for bad tenants.

Periodic tenancy wrecking ball

Plus, MPs need to appreciate that the Bill’s aim of ending six-month Assured Shorthold Tenancies (ASTs) to periodic tenancies is a wrecking ball for the student accommodation sector.

Students typically rent for fixed academic terms, and private landlords rely on these short-term ASTs to align with university calendars, ensuring predictable turnover and income.

Forcing rolling contracts onto the student PRS – where they can leave with minimal notice – will create chaos, leaving landlords exposed to voids mid-year when student demand plummets.

Undoubtedly, many will abandon the student market entirely, slashing rental options for students already struggling with housing shortages.

Also, if fixed-term ASTs remain for purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA), why are private student landlords being saddled with this unworkable periodic tenancy system?

It’s a blatant double standard that will drive up student rents and push more properties to Serco or to private sales.

Labour is being arrogant

Ah, yes, the Serco deal. The government is handing contracts to Serco and others to house asylum seekers, pitting them against tenants for a dwindling supply of private rentals.

With the Bill making it harder to manage HMOs, student lets or private tenancies, many landlords will find Serco’s contracts far more appealing.

Why bother screening tenants or dealing with voids when Serco offers guaranteed income? This isn’t speculation – it’s already happening, and the Bill will turbocharge it. Quality homes will be cherry-picked for asylum seekers, leaving tenants to fight over the scraps.

Labour’s arrogance is staggering. They’ve ignored landlords’ warnings in the Commons and Lords debates, dismissing sensible amendments and are treating us like the enemy.

But we’re not the ones who’ll pay the price.

Small-portfolio landlords, the backbone of the private rental sector, are being squeezed out.

Larger corporate landlords, who can still offset finance costs, will dominate, jacking up rents to boost dividends and profits. That leaves tenants as the real losers, along with students.

Labour is punching down

This isn’t just about the Renters’ Rights Bill. It’s the cumulative punching down of Labour’s policies: tax changes, EPC mandates, Serco contracts and now this new law.

Together, they’re a recipe for a housing crisis. When rents soar and homelessness spikes, Labour will point fingers, but the blame lies with them. They were warned. They didn’t listen.

Landlords, you know the numbers. If the costs don’t add up, you’ll do what any rational businessperson will do: sell, move family in, or pivot to easier options like Serco.

The Renters’ Rights Bill isn’t about protecting tenants – it’s betraying them.

So, act today and write to your MP. Use the letter below to spell out the disaster awaiting tenants if this bill passes.

Make it clear: when tenants are furious at the next election, MPs who vote for this Bill will own the consequences.

Until next time,

The Landlord Crusader

Find your MP’s contact details on the Parliament website.

You can copy the letter below to your MP or download it from the Property118 website – Here is the Word version, and here’s the PDF version. Either print it off and post it or copy and paste as an email.

 

Email subject: Urgent: Please reconsider support for the Renters’ Rights Bill

Dear [MP’s name],

As a private landlord in your constituency, I urge you to reconsider supporting the Renters’ Rights Bill in its upcoming Commons vote. While intended to protect tenants, this Bill will have severe unintended consequences that will harm the very people it claims to help.

The Bill’s ban on accepting offers above advertised rent will force landlords to set rents at maximum market rates, as seen in Scotland’s rent control experiment. This will drive rents higher, not lower. Combined with existing tax policies preventing small-portfolio landlords from offsetting finance costs, and new pressures like costly EPC upgrades, many landlords, including myself, face unsustainable margins. That means we will be forced to sell properties or exit the market entirely.

This exodus is already happening, contrary to the Housing Minister’s claims, reducing the supply of rental homes. The government’s deal with the likes of Serco to house asylum seekers further strains this finite supply, as landlords may find it more viable to rent to Serco than to private tenants.

Tenants will bear the brunt: sky-high rents, fewer homes and increased homelessness. The Renters’ Rights Bill, alongside other policies, creates a punitive environment for renters, not landlords. Larger corporate landlords may weather these changes, but small landlords, who form the backbone of the private rented sector, cannot.

You were warned in the Commons and Lords debates. Voting for this bill risks creating a tenant’s housing crisis for which MPs will be held accountable. Please vote against the Renters’ Rights Bill to protect tenants – your constituents – from its devastating consequences.

Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Details]
Landlord in [Constituency Name]


Share This Article


Comments

Avatar

GEORGE WARREN

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

10:27 AM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

A tad late!

Avatar

Smallfry

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

10:37 AM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

Sent but won’t be holding my breath it takes our governments (note plural)
Years to notice the problems they are causing, let alone act on them,
Unfortunately we are led by those who are so insulated from the people and their problems they really have no clue
Maybe it really is time for a radical change

Avatar

Leicester Landlord

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

10:44 AM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Smallfry at 16/05/2025 – 10:37
Sent to three MPs. Not sure what the outcome will be but at least I can say I got involved to change this madness.

Avatar

David

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

11:05 AM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

Sent earlier to my MP (Lib Demon) who effectively said she is not interested in landlords, only tenants.Government crocodile tears when it’s all about
private landlords out, corporate landlords in, more back handers to chums.

Avatar

John MacAlevey

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

11:14 AM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

Pointless emailing a labour MP, they`d never put their communist heads above the parapet.

Avatar

Judith Wordsworth

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

12:37 PM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

I would amend slightly to

Dear [MP’s name],

As a private landlord [in your constituency], I urge you to NOT SUPPORT the Renters’ Rights Bill in its upcoming Commons vote.

While intended to protect tenants, this LEGISLATION will have severe unintended consequences that will harm the very people it claims to help. Tenants will bear the brunt. with likelihood of sky-high rents, fewer homes RESULTING IN increased homelessness.

THE LEGISLATION WILL

1. Drive rents higher, not lower.
2. See fewer rental properties for families, young professionals and students.
3. Create a punitive environment for renters, not landlords.
4. See foreign students unable to find accommodation as banned from paying rents upfront AND which will see tertiary education providers suffer financially.
5. See students in student HMOs having their Council Tax emption status removed. If 1 student in a student HMO remains in the property and is no longer a full time student, for whatever reason, ALL students in that property will be required to pay Council Tax.

Other related legislation will also result in fewer rental properties for UK families and young people ie

1. The minima of EPC C. Much of the UK’s privately owned rental housing stock is pre 1970 and not only not able to be upgraded to an EPC C but financially not logistical to do so.

2. Existing and proposed tax policies prevent small-portfolio landlords from offsetting finance costs and make owning PRS property no longer viable.

3. Further strains on this finite PRS property supply diminishes as landlords rent to Serco et al rather than to private tenants to house asylum seekers

All the above combine to force smaller portfolio PRS landlords to sell their properties and exit the sector.

This exodus is already happening, contrary to the Housing Minister’s claims, and is continually reducing the supply of PRS rental homes for UK families, young professionals and students.

Small portfolio landlords form the backbone of the Private Rented Sector and cannot weather these legislative measures.

Voting for this Bill risks creating a tenant’s housing crisis for which MPs will be held accountable. 4.7 million families are at risk and this does not include the tertiary student population.

Please vote against the Renters’ Rights Bill to protect tenants, young professionals and students from its devastating ill thought out consequences.

Yours sincerely,
[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Your Contact Details]
Landlord in [Constituency Name]

Avatar

JaSam

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

13:03 PM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

I assume my reform MP will vote against this. Either way it’s still happening.

Avatar

Gromit

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

13:05 PM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Smallfry at 16/05/2025 – 10:37
They aren’t insulated, they know exactly what the consequences will be. What are doing is calculated & very deliberate. They want their large corporate friends to step in when rents are at their highest. Tenants losing out/made homeless is just collateral damage and will blame greedy Landlords.

Avatar

Person Of The People

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

14:31 PM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

You’re Missing the Real Game Plan

Let’s stop pretending this is about “helping renters” or “tackling rogue landlords.” Labour’s real aim is crystal clear: dismantle the private rental market for all but the biggest corporate landlords—those who can be bent into compliant extensions of the state through layers of regulation and subsidy.

The quickest way to do this? Wreck the market from both ends. Make it intolerable for small landlords and miserable for tenants. Then, once the outcry reaches fever pitch, swoop in with a “solution”: reintroduce a Rent Act-style regime where government-appointed rent officers impose capped rents every two years. That mechanism has never disappeared—it’s just been sleeping, with rent officers reassigned until the right political moment to bring them back.

We’ve seen this movie before. In 1977, landlords were forced to maintain properties where costs exceeded 100% of the regulated rent. The result? They were financially strangled, driven to offload their properties to owner-occupiers or sitting tenants—at prices that reflected the crushing burden.

This time around, Labour won’t leave it to chance. They’ll offer tenants state-backed mortgages—at the artificially reduced values created by rent suppression—to “help them onto the property ladder.” The result? A quiet confiscation of private property disguised as social progress.

And guess what? All those coerced sales will be counted towards Labour’s flagship “1.5 million new homes” pledge—an electoral win wrapped in a socialist land grab.

This isn’t reform. It’s expropriation by stealth.

Avatar

Gromit

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

15:23 PM, 16th May 2025, About 6 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Person Of The People at 16/05/2025 – 14:31
I agree up until the disposal of properties. Personally, I think they’ll be bought up by Blackrock at a heavily discounted price. Why do you think Larry Fink had a secret meeting meeting with Starmer earlier this year in No.10?

1 2

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up