9:59 AM, 16th May 2025, About 8 months ago 9
Text Size
Categories:
The Renters’ Rights Bill has passed the committee stage and will now head to Report stage.
During the final debate, peers clashed over whether landlords need a transition period before the bill takes effect and the risks of landlords leaving the market.
Baroness Scott of Bybrook warned the House of Lords that the Renters’ Rights Bill risks driving landlords out of the market and fails to deliver on its promises.
She told the debate: “We all agree that tenants deserve safe, secure and decent homes at a fair price, but to deliver that we need a functioning rental market with enough good-quality homes to meet growing demand.
“We need more homes in the right places. This bill, regrettably, puts that in danger. Rather than boosting supply, it risks driving landlords out of the market, shrinking the number of available homes and pushing rents even higher. If we get this wrong, renters will pay the price. Balance is essential. At present, we believe this Bill does not strike that balance.”
Under the Renters’ Rights Bill, the abolition of Section 21 will take effect immediately once the Bill is passed, along with other new regulations.
However, Baroness Scott warns that landlords need more time to adjust.
She said: “We simply cannot expect landlords to react and comply with significant new requirements on day one. Indeed, the evidence bears this out. In a recent survey conducted by Paragon, 57% of landlords said they had heard of the legislation but did not fully understand its implications, and a further 39% said they knew little about it.
“Those statistics point clearly to a knowledge gap in the market, one that we must not ignore. Therefore, we believe that a clear transition period is necessary.
“A phased approach would allow landlords, tenants and letting agents time to understand and adapt to the new legal framework. Commencing the Act immediately upon passage does not provide sufficient time to do this.”
Lord Bird, founder of the Big Issue, tabled an amendment to abolish Section 21 once the Renters’ Rights Bill becomes law, a move the government has agreed to and plans to implement as soon as possible.
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, the housing minister, backed Lord Bird and explained how the Bill will work in practice, saying more details will be shared during the report stage.
She explained: “We agree with Lord Bird that measures in this Bill are urgently needed, which is why we moved swiftly to introduce it early in our first legislative programme for government. To end the scourge of Section 21 evictions as quickly as possible, we will introduce the new tenancy for the private rented sector in one stage.
“On that date, the new tenancy system will apply to all private tenancies. Existing tenancies will convert to the new system, and any new tenancies signed on or after that date will be governed by the new rules. There will be no dither or delay, and the abolition of Section 21, fixed-term contracts, and other vital measures in the Bill will happen as quickly as possible.”
Baroness Stevenage adds: “However, we must do this in a responsible manner, as noble Lords have mentioned.
We are therefore also committed to making sure that implementation takes place smoothly. As such, it is essential that wider work around the Bill is allowed to conclude before implementation takes place. That includes the production of guidance, updating court forms and making secondary legislation.
“For example, the information that landlords are required to give tenants in the written statement of terms will be set out in secondary legislation. Work is already under way on these matters. We need to get it right. We will appoint the date of implementation via secondary legislation, which is typical when commencing complex primary legislation. This will allow us to give the sector certainty about when the system will come into force.”
In a heated exchange between the founder of the Big Issue, Lord Bird, and Labour’s Lord Hacking, Lord Bird claimed tenants have spent years making landlords richer.
Lord Bird claimed: “If you look at what has happened to the property market over the last 40 or 50 years, the role of the tenant has been to make sure that the landlord gets richer and richer, because we know the way the property market has been going.
“It has been going in a direction where people can buy a house in one decade, my ex-wife did so, and sell it later in the decade for maybe two or three times as much. The landlord would often have done not much more than rent the property out and keep it going.”
His comments were quickly challenged by Labour peer Lord Hacking, who responded: “That is not true.”
Lord Bird, however, stood by his position, saying: “I am telling the noble Lord that, from my experience, it is. From my experience, what has happened is that tenants have made a very large section of the population who are small landlords much wealthier.”
However, Lord Bird overlooked the fact that the median gross income for landlords is around £25,000 before expenses, with 41% earning less than £20,000, showing that many landlords don’t make the kind of profits he suggests.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Dylan Morris
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1179
11:44 AM, 16th May 2025, About 8 months ago
Clever bloke this Lord Bird he has a vested interest in seeing an increase in the homeless, as it’s from them that he makes his rich living.
A Reader
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since November 2024 - Comments: 81
12:59 PM, 16th May 2025, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Dylan Morris at 16/05/2025 – 11:44Very sad but true that someone can make millions on the back of the plight and misery of homeless people by not actually providing roofs over their heads. That the selling of the Big Issue by homeless people helps their plight is extremely questionable in my opinion and where is his evidence of helping homeless? Hard facts and figures please NOT vacuous words and propaganda generating.
Stella
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 598
13:50 PM, 16th May 2025, About 8 months ago
As usual Lord Bird is being economical with the facts.
Unfortunately these are the only people that the government seem to listen to.
Landers Spencer Spencer
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 1
16:39 PM, 16th May 2025, About 8 months ago
Secondary legislation before section 21 is actually banned? So won’t this secondary legislation take another one year or more to go through the Houses of Parliament??
Reluctant Landlord
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3395 - Articles: 5
19:09 PM, 16th May 2025, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Landers Spencer Spencer at 16/05/2025 – 16:39
that’s how I read it….
Some ‘clarity’ perhaps that the actual implementation of the RRB may not be as quick as it being portrayed given the work needed in secondary legislation which is to underpin it?
Carchester
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2019 - Comments: 116
10:37 AM, 17th May 2025, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Landers Spencer Spencer at 16/05/2025 – 16:39
Secondary legislation is draughted by Civil Servants ortherwise known as parliamentary draughtsmen.
MP’s usually just give the “Nod” to the draughts thence becoming Regulations. So very often it is what is in the Regulations that causes the perverse outcomes.
Carchester.
Northernpleb
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since November 2019 - Comments: 143
11:28 AM, 17th May 2025, About 8 months ago
The same as gone for Home Owners , Property Prices have risen for them also.
Tenants have benefitted by having somewhere to live.
No one in Government seems to consider why anyone would like to invest in a BTL property under these conditions . And what would attract existing Landlords to stay in.
Also before Section 24 most Tenants were were able to find a property to rent at a reasonable rent. The Government knew this would happen because this type of taxation was tried in Ireland and stopped because of the problems it caused .
More legislation and Taxation will reduce the number of rental properties.
Also the Prospect of getting a £30000 fine of the Council because your 1930 Semi cannot get a EPC grade C is not very appealing
Once we are trapped by RRB and cannot get our properties back The Labour Government will be able to introduce any amount of Regulations and Taxations
Desert Rat
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 184
3:39 AM, 18th May 2025, About 8 months ago
Northernpleb, I have friends in Ireland and have seen what the government has done over there, They have totally killed the rental market. Tenants can not find anywhere to live. The UK is about to follow in their footsteps.
I have tenants that need to move but have nowhere to go.
Properties advertised on Right move have long gone, but still being advertised.
I’ve never seen so many houses advertised for sale with tenant in situ or ex rentals as I’ve seen recently.
Savvy landlords are selling up and the government either dont realize or dont care about all of the people that are about to be homeless.
They are just too busy pushing through the RRB
The conservatives started this mess, Labor are going to known as the government that made the most people homeless.
I’ve never voted before but even though I hate Farage and I think he will destroy the UK, I may have to register and vote for him. Both the Conservatives and Labor have lost the plot.
I don’t have any idea where they are going to house all of the people that they are about to make homeless.
Stella
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 598
10:19 AM, 18th May 2025, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Desert Rat at 18/05/2025 – 03:39I agree, this is what I have noticed in Ireland also.
There are a lot of homeless in Dublin I understand that the Government are tinkering at the edges trying to change things but with not much success.
We do not need to look at what has happened in Ireland to see what will happen here with the RRB, some of us were around pre 1988 housing act and remember what things were like then. Unfortunately the people making these unworkable laws have little perception of the consequences.