1 year ago | 2 comments
A critical flaw may have been found in the Renters’ Rights Bill (RRB) which might allow landlords to circumvent the ban on no-fault evictions, one firm says.
The analysis by Inventory Base reveals that while the legislation will abolish Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions, landlords could exploit the issue of carrying out major property repairs.
Section 6B of the Bill, if enacted as drafted, would permit landlords to reclaim properties for substantial refurbishment.
This might seem justifiable since properties do require maintenance and landlords are facing the possibility of upgrading homes to meet the EPC C rating by 2030.
However, Inventory Base cautions that the Bill’s provision lacks clarity.
And without tight controls, it could become a pretext for evictions.
The firm’s operations director, Siân Hemming-Metcalfe, said: “Section 6B could be a sensible reform – if it’s handled properly.
“But without clear definitions and proper oversight, it runs the risk of being misused, disputed or even ignored.
“The rental sector needs transparency, accountability and balance – and independently commissioned inventory reports can help deliver exactly that.”
She adds: “If landlords, tenants and local authorities all want a fair, functional system, evidence-backed documentation needs to be part of the equation.
“Otherwise, we’re looking at yet another policy change that creates more problems than it solves.”
Essentially, the ambiguity surrounding what constitutes ‘major works’ poses another challenge.
That’s because the Bill fails to specify whether this includes comprehensive renovations, structural fixes or simpler upgrades like new kitchens.
This vagueness could trigger numerous disputes, overwhelming councils and courts as tenants contest the legitimacy of their removals.
The firm says that independent inventory reports could provide a solution for landlords by adding transparency and accountability.
These documents could verify a property’s condition before work begins, ensuring that claimed repairs are necessary rather than cosmetic.
Ongoing checks during projects would confirm that renovations are progressing as stated, preventing abuse of the system.
The firm found that in England and Wales in 2020, court bailiffs carried out 7,451 repossession orders, which climbed to 9,471 in 2021.
The figure surged to 19,651 in 2022 after pandemic restrictions eased, then escalated further to 25,282 in 2023 and 27,993 in 2024.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 year ago | 2 comments
1 year ago | 24 comments
1 year ago | 11 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1581
3:16 PM, 2nd April 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Seething Landlord at 02/04/2025 – 11:38It’s bad enough when Shelter (who don’t provide shelter to anyone) and the likes of Generation Rent call Section 21 the ‘no fault’ eviction. People representing landlords should never do so.
Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 1102 - Articles: 1
7:08 PM, 2nd April 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 02/04/2025 – 15:16
Yes I know it’s an emotive subject but you really need to take off your blinkers and remember that S21 was always intended to be used as a backstop when there were no grounds available under S8.
Landlords have turned the system to their advantage by using S21 because it provided a much simpler and surer way of gaining possession, even when there were grounds available under S8.
As far as the law is concerned S21 is a means of gaining possession without demonstrating any fault on the part of the tenant and is therefore correctly described as a no fault ground, regardless of the fact that there might be underlying fault in many cases.
You can’t have it both ways, if you don’t want to go to the trouble and expense of having to prove why possession should be granted the only option is to go for the easy way out by using the no fault system.
Member Since November 2020 - Comments: 134
1:49 AM, 3rd April 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 02/04/2025 – 10:45
Yep. Very smart.
Member Since December 2013 - Comments: 179
10:12 PM, 3rd April 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Seething Landlord at 02/04/2025 – 19:08
Who said that that was the initial intention of sec21? I was around and landlording right on the back of the Housing Act 1988 and don’t remember it being put that way and I certainly don’t see it as ‘Landlords turning the system to their advantage’. As a landlord who has always sought long term tenants and only asks tenants to ‘pay the rent, look after the house and be right with me and neighbours’, I certainly don’t see it as any advantage whenever Ive had to evict a tenant for compromising these requests.
Wow, as if we didn’t have enough enemies on the outside.
Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 1102 - Articles: 1
11:38 PM, 3rd April 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Saul Smart at 03/04/2025 – 22:12
So what was the rationale for having both S8 and S21?