Landlord Insurance Query - Public liability for flat?

Landlord Insurance Query – Public liability for flat?

10:42 AM, 2nd March 2016, 10 years ago 13

I have a landlord insurance query that I hope some may be able to advise me on.flat

I am looking to get landlord insurance on a buy-to-let flat (yet to exchange) within a house that’s been converted into 4 flats in total. I will have a share of the freehold of the flat, which is held within a company. The company has a block buildings insurance policy and I therefore only need public liability insurance (the flat is unfurnished so I don’t need contents insurance).

I have spoken with a landlord insurance company and they informed me that I could not purchase public liability insurance on its own and had to have a form of contents insurance or building insurance in order to get this – is this correct?

I’m a little confused as I don’t want to buy extra insurance unnecessarily and I only want the public liability bit to insure me against any accidents the tenants may have (and possible accidental damage by tenants and track and trace).

Before I knew about the block insurance, I got a quote online, which included public liability and buildings insurance and this was roughly similar to the price I will be paying for the block insurance policy. The quote I was given on the phone when I just asked for public liability however, was even higher than this, which seems strange if it doesn’t include the buildings insurance aspect.

I want to make sure I’m getting the correct cover and not getting cover twice, so any advice would be very much appreciated.

Many thanks,

Martha


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since February 2011 - Comments: 3453 - Articles: 286

    10:47 AM, 2nd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Hi Martha,

    We have had a recent article written by our insurance partner Jason: Insurance Explained – What is Landlord Insurance?
    see >> https://www.property118.com/insurance-explained-what-is-landlord-insurance/84828/

    From an extract: “Block Landlord Insurance and what it means for you

    If you own a leasehold flat then you will have a landlord in charge of the block who will supply the buildings insurance. You cannot double insure the property, that is pointless and will cost you money for no benefit. Ultimately you will be found out in a claim and could face action for fraud. Ignorance is not an excuse.

    You can buy Landlords Contents Insurance and that allows you to add liability cover, Rent Guarantee Insurance, Landlord Emergency Insurance, Legal Expenses Insurance or even Boiler Cover. What you can add on will depend on the insurer you are talking to.

    Many landlords will buy a minimum of £5000 Landlord Contents Insurance in order to access the liability cover alone – which is normally providing around £1-million cover.”

    Our Property118 Landlords insurance Guarantees to beat any like for like quote and you can apply here if you wish >> https://www.property118.com/insurance-landlords/

  • Member Since November 2013 - Comments: 1130 - Articles: 2

    11:20 AM, 2nd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Even if the property is unfurnished, you still need to insure the fixtures and fittings (e.g. fitted kitchen and bathroom fittings, but not plumbing) and this is usually what landlord contents only insurance covers as a minimum.

  • Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 1121

    3:54 PM, 2nd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Buy the contents insurance but make sure that the exclusions do not mitigate or undermine the cover. For example the cover may exclude students or DHSS tenants. The £60-£70 it costs is peanuts compared with a £1000 plus claim from a tenant for tripping over a worn carpet edge

  • Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 1121

    3:56 PM, 2nd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    And Mark Alexander told me to do this years ago!

  • Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 175 - Articles: 99

    4:43 PM, 2nd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Hi Martha

    Yes, you need contents insurance to access public liability right now. Appreciate you may not need contents cover, but it’s the only way to access public liability and is a route many take.

    However, along with 118, I am working on a standalone Public Liability Insurance product that I hope to have access to shortly, I am waiting on underwriters to come back to me and have chased them today based on your enquiry.

    We hope to have news on this product – and another insurance for sub let landlords shortly as it is clear the market needs these.

    Best

    Jason McClean
    07734-113554

  • Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 1562

    5:54 PM, 2nd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Reply to the comment left by “Gary Nock” at “02/03/2016 – 15:54“:

    The £60-£70 it costs is peanuts compared with a £1000 plus claim from a tenant for tripping over a worn carpet edge.

    I reckon that is prudent move and it helps you to sleep at night.

    -But I don’t do it. (NB we are just talking about leasehold flats now.)

    My thinking as follows-

    Most of the liability risk is covered by the buildings insurance.

    So you are only left with the tripping over a carpet edge scenario.
    i.e risks within the flat.*

    All my flats are let to non-vulnerable people, are modern and well maintained.

    So using Gary’s figures above (not saying they are 100% right but a reasonable start point).

    A medium portfolio landlord with 20 flats paying the above premiums over a 30 year career equates to about £40,000 (not including compounding.)

    Again using Gary’s figure above of £1000 plus claims, that is a hell of a lot of (genuine) trips over well maintained carpets. I’ve never had one.

    Even if the insurance company did pay out

    …..and then continued to insure a habitually unlucky landlord.

    Insurers and brokers advise insurance against every risk.

    As I said, not saying this isn’t a prudent move but I don’t do it.

    Just putting it up for debate.

  • Member Since February 2015 - Comments: 5

    11:12 PM, 2nd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Hi all,

    Thanks so much for your comments! I think I will call the insurance company who are providing the block policy cover to the house of flats to confirm what they do and do not cover.

    There is an element of contents insurance covered in this policy and I don’t want to double insure myself. As Neil has pointed out above from the Insurance explained article, I don’t want to risk a potential fraudulent claim if I have accidentally double insured myself. Although, if I have to have an element of contents insurance in order to get the public liability insurance, it seems I may have no choice but to double insure myself on the contents aspect (if my block policy also has contents insurance) – or am I misunderstanding?

    The policy also mentions ‘occupiers and personal liability’ but not public liability and, under the ‘contents’ section, it mentions ‘tenants liability’.
    I am unfamiliar with the meaning of these terms so I think I will need to speak to them directly to explain my situation and see what they can offer me for the additional public liability aspect.

    Jason your work on a standalone public liability insurance policy sounds very promising and I shall be keeping an eye on property 118 for any updates!

    Many thanks again all.

    Martha

  • Member Since December 2015 - Comments: 452

    8:55 AM, 3rd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Surely being double insured is not fraudulent, unless done with that intent? It is claiming twice for same item that would be the fraud.

    You must have some landlord items for potential insurance in an unfurnished flat, IE fire blankets, lamp shades, perhaps carpets etc.

    If Monty wished to, I think personal liability insurance would be viable for all his activities, googling PLI gives many peddling it, so sure Jason will get some. But checking the AST wording to ensure tenant has the responsibility to insure own items, all risks for accidents, and that no indication of insurance is given that isn’t provided.

  • Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 1121

    9:15 AM, 3rd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Hi Monty

    Please do not assume that the Freeholders block insurance will cover you in the event of a claim in a communal area. There was a stated case last year as I recall on a liability on landlords as well as managing agents for communal areas. If the Freeholder denied liability then the claimants no win no fee vultures woud come after the landlord. They probably would anyway as they would go for both the landlord and The Freeholder in the first instance to hedge their bets. I have checked on this in the past Freeholders block insurance will not cover a landlords public liability.

  • Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 175 - Articles: 99

    9:25 AM, 3rd March 2016, About 10 years ago

    Don’t assume that the landlord’s insurance will cover you. Find out by getting the policy schedule and checking. If it doesn’t then you can make an informed decision!

    I hope to update ref PL soon.

    Best

    Jason

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or