Landlord incentives branded a ‘waste of public money’ by Generation Rent

Landlord incentives branded a ‘waste of public money’ by Generation Rent

Hands holding a large stack of cash with the word "Incentive" above.
9:33 AM, 2nd September 2025, 8 months ago 13

Generation Rent has accused landlords of ‘rigging the system to line their own pockets’ after findings revealed councils are spending millions of pounds in one-off incentive cash payments to private landlords to house homeless people.

Generation Rent sent a Freedom of Information (FOIs) request to 32 London councils who provide statutory homelessness services and the ten councils outside of London with the biggest statutory homelessness issues.

The findings revealed 37 councils spent more than £31m on one-off cash payments to private landlords on 10,792 occasions in 2024-25.

The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has hit back at the findings, claiming the payment incentives allow landlords to take on families who are likely to fall into arrears.

Landlords are often a law unto themselves, rigging the system to line their own pockets

Ben Twomey, chief executive at Generation Rent, said: “Everyone needs a home, it’s the foundation of our lives. But the rental market is like the wild west. Landlords are often a law unto themselves, rigging the system to line their own pockets at the expense of people experiencing homelessness and the local councils that are trying to house them.

“The soaring cost of renting and the government’s decision to freeze the Local Housing Allowance has put councils across the country in a near impossible position.

“In a desperate bid to avoid placing people in temporary accommodation, they’re forced to pay individual landlords sometimes tens of thousands of pounds just for them to agree to rent out their home. It’s a senseless waste of our public money.”

According to the research, 27 councils spent over £24 million on landlord incentives in 2024/25, an average spend of over £900k per council.

Six London councils reported paying £10,000 or more for a single incentive payment

Compared to 2018, the overall money spent by councils in London has increased by more than £8.5million (54%).

Meanwhile, in 2018, only one council in London reported paying an incentive of £10,000 or higher, whereas, in 2024/25, six London councils reported paying £10,000 or more for a single incentive payment.

According to the data, the councils with the highest annual spending were Manchester City Council (£3,345,411.95), Enfield Council (£2,730,337.42), Ealing Council (£2,259,913.77), Birmingham Council (£1,657,605), and Nottingham Council (£1,595,276).

The largest single incentives paid to private landlords were £15,385.44 by Southwark Council, £13,500 by Camden Council, £13,000 by Hammersmith and Fulham Council, £11,367.42 by Ealing Council, and £10,700 by Brent Council.

Helps landlords cover their costs and to offer accommodation

The NRLA defended the use of these incentives, arguing that they helped landlords cover costs, claiming the incentives help landlords to cover costs.

Chris Norris, the policy director at the NRLA, told the Guardian: “Landlords are increasingly finding that people who are reliant on local housing allowance or universal credit simply can’t afford to rent, and the incentives allow landlords to take on families who were likely to fall into arrears.

Mr Norris also explained to the Guardian the incentives were offered to landlords to get them to take on tenants “perceived to represent a higher risk”, such as people with substance abuse issues or who had come out of prison.

Mr Norris explained to the Guardian the incentives fill a gap for vulnerable tenants who would otherwise find it difficult to find a place to live.

He told the Guardian: “Frankly, it does a job and it’s probably the least bad option available to a lot of local authorities at the moment.

“It helps landlords cover their costs and to offer accommodation, but it would be far more efficient and equitable if the government actually ensured there was a welfare system that allowed people to access homes in the first place.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 373

    10:02 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    Dear Generation Rent, the answer is ask government and councils to house the homeless, but either way it will cost the taxpayer. Whatever landlord’s do they will be condemned .

  • Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 333

    10:08 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    If Councils were allowed to charge a financially viable rent for Social Housing they could buy or build far more of it and not need to incentivise PRS landlords to take surplus Social tenants.

    Once Section 21 is abolished Local Authorities won’t have to provide housing for so many people anyway. Any breach of tenancy resulting in a Section 8 eviction will have made them intentionally homeless and not entitled to assistance.

    Increasing LHA to the 30th percentile rent would help numerous tenants retain their tenancies and reduce the need for Councils to magic up emergency accommodation.

    In just about every scenario the PRS is a much cheaper option than hotels even if it does require lump sum incentives.

  • Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2

    10:09 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    Generation Rent would be proud of me, for I will not accept any incentive offered by Local Authorities, neither will I take any government money to house tenants such as housing benefit (another of GR;s gripes). All my tenants pay their own way with no subsidy from the public purse.

  • Member Since June 2022 - Comments: 9

    10:39 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    Only tenants who pass referencing for me!

  • Member Since December 2015 - Comments: 292

    11:09 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    If it was not for shelter and gen rent, media etc there would be more houses to rent for everyone. Rents would be lower and no incentives would be required from councils.
    Well done to all of the media gen rent and shelter. etc. slap yourselves on the back.
    Reap what you sow🤣🤣

  • Member Since December 2015 - Comments: 292

    11:11 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    Better still ask shelter to house them – they have loads of money and house no one!

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 754

    11:27 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    No mention of the UC system enabling tenants to thieve from the tax payer by not paying to their LLs the rent they have been paid.

    Does Mr Twomey not regard that to be an even greater abuse of public funds than so called ‘incentive payments’.

    LLs are the least able to ‘rig’ the system – more often than not they are the victims of it. But that wouldn’t make a good headline, would it Mr Twomey? Or should that be Master Twomey, as you don’t seem to be fully grown up yet.

  • Member Since October 2021 - Comments: 62

    11:52 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    It’s a horribly grey area. We took one on using this incentive. Poor single mother needed help…. She immediately fell into arrears, said the council incentive was actually hers. to offset rent, not a landlord incentive.!
    All the while claiming her housing/rent payment benefits.
    Took us three years to get her out, flat was destroyed. Drugs, animal excrement, anti social behaviour, just utterly dreadful.
    You reap what you sow gen rent, for most of us there isn’t enough money that could be waved about to ever take on DSS again.

  • Member Since November 2024 - Comments: 11

    12:38 PM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    What will they call themselves when there’s finally nowhere left to rent….Generation What? They might all be out of a job because there will be noone to moan about?

  • Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 9

    3:27 PM, 2nd September 2025, About 8 months ago

    lol, we had a couple wanting to rent who said council will pay first month plus deposit as incentive. The couple asked us to add on two extra months so they could have a good Xmas ! No didn’t take them on but did take on single lad who worked and council paid his first month plus deposit and he’s been fab.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles