9:32 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago 11
Text Size
Categories:
A Labour proposal to apply National Insurance contributions to rental income could be the ‘final nail in the coffin’ for private landlords, critics say.
The move will reshape the UK’s private rented sector with a dwindling property supply and soaring rents.
The plan, aimed at addressing a £40 billion public finance shortfall, targets landlords’ ‘unearned income’ and is expected to raise approximately £2 billion.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is steering this initiative to uphold Labour’s pledge to avoid hiking VAT, income tax, or existing National Insurance rates.
However, Mark Bailey, a partner at property auctioneers Landwood Group, says the additional levy could devastate landlords already grappling with tight margins.
He said: “Layering National Insurance on top of rental income risks being the nail in the coffin for landlords already stretched to the limit.
“Margins are wafer-thin thanks to soaring mortgage rates, tougher regulation and an existing tax burden.
“Add NI into the mix and staying in the market starts to make little financial sense.”
He added: “At Landwood, we’re already seeing landlords approaching us for controlled exits.
“Some are acting proactively, others are trying to protect their assets before it’s too late.”
Mr Bailey continued: “Every time property ownership becomes less profitable, supply shrinks.
“Fewer landlords remain in the market, fewer properties are available to rent, and rents inevitably rise.
“Yet policymakers often seem surprised when this happens.”
He adds: “National Insurance threats, coupled with suspected new levies on high-value homes and the removal of capital gains tax exemptions, don’t just affect landlords.
“They directly hit tenants too, making housing less affordable and intensifying pressure across the rental sector.
“This is a wider market issue where the private rented sector has long been a stabilising force, but measures that make investment less viable threaten to undermine the entire system.”
Mr Bailey’s claim that applying National Insurance contributions to rental income is the ‘final nail’ has been echoed by another property expert.
Charlie Newsome, a divisional director at wealth manager Rathbones, said: “Far from being ‘safe as houses’, the investment case for residential property has shifted dramatically.
“Slower price growth, higher borrowing costs and increasing regulation have combined to erode the appeal of property as an asset class.
“A new property tax could be the last nail in the coffin for property’s status as a viable investment and cause potentially tens of thousands of people planning for retirement to rethink their strategy.”
He added: “A tax that scales with property values risks deepening the housing crisis.
“It could even create the perverse outcome where less well-off homeowners in deprived urban areas where house prices are high are penalised more than wealthy homeowners in rural areas, where values are lower.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
David
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 284
10:04 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
Every action by government seems to be the last nail in the coffin for landlords but never seems to be, in fact some sources claim more people want to become landlords!
The_Maluka
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2137 - Articles: 1
10:15 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
Reply to the comment left by David at 02/09/2025 – 10:04
More fool them.
Dylan Morris
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1189
10:19 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
It’s to force desperate landlords to rent to Serco. Who will ignore all discrimination laws and put only illegal migrants in the properties.
MartinR
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since December 2019 - Comments: 18
10:36 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
I will be adding the NI cost to the rent plus a penalty.
If you are of pensionable age you do not pay NI. Will that mean pensioners would be exempt from paying NI on their rental income?
J CHAPMAN
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since April 2020 - Comments: 29
11:21 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
Reply to the comment left by MartinR at 02/09/2025 – 10:36
I doubt pensioner Landlords will get away without paying NI, this will be a ‘special rate’, just for Landlords. Personally, I think they are putting tax raising ideas out there to see how bad the backlash is. The reaction to this idea is that rents will go up, so I don’t think they will do it. They are more likely to align CGT with income tax.
Darren Peters
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 469
11:36 AM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
Reply to the comment left by David at 02/09/2025 – 10:04
That’s because we haven’t found a way to go on strike or in some way be such a pain that we are listened to.
Unfortunately we are just like Milton from office Space.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vsayg_S4pJg&ab_channel=franswiggidy
Suspicious Steve
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 70
13:38 PM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
This article uses the word “levy” rather than national insurance. That’s probably more likely. My blog post shows that introducing national insurance would create loopholes and class action against the government. https://think-we-are-stupid.blogspot.com/2025/08/rachel-planning-to-charge-national.html
A levy could be a new tax just for landlords. Quite how this would be introduced is a different matter. The simple way would be for it to be on rental income but that would be simply cause rents to rise (yet more inflation). If it’s on “profits” that’s more challenging since in reality profits are slim.
Rather than Rachel trying to make tax law even more complicated in order to raise tax why doesnt she cut costs? Start with the circa 500,000 public sector employees which we’ve acquired since the pandemic. Services are worse now so clearly these extra half a million people are not adding any value so why not sack them….
Caroline Newman
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 20
13:48 PM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
Can I ask which minister has actually released this information?? As far as my resources go – the chancellor hasn’t mentioned it and ministers wont comment. So I’m just curious where/who it initially came from?
Ed Tuff
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since August 2017 - Comments: 50
14:25 PM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
The final, final, final nail in the coffin!
Caroline Newman
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 20
14:36 PM, 2nd September 2025, About 5 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Caroline Newman at 02/09/2025 – 13:48
After more research, it actually was a leaked document from the HM Treasury to The Times. It was a ‘suggestion’ not a recommendation?. All media then jumped on it and in true style its been dramatized to the point I have landlords asking me to sell their properties ahead of the tax hike (which may not happen)
Scare mongering and unbalanced reporting.
That said – who knows what this joke of a government will do.
As if rental property stock isnt at its lowest and rents at their highest already.