3 weeks ago | 43 comments
A Labour MP claims private landlords are allowing anti-social behaviour by their tenants to go unchecked.
In a debate on police funding in the North East, Labour MP Alan Strickland claims councils are failing to act against irresponsible landlords.
Under the Renters’ Rights Act, landlords can evict tenants for anti-social behaviour.
During the debate, Mr Strickland said: “A key concern is about the growth in poorly regulated private landlords who too often allow crime and antisocial behaviour by their tenants to go unchecked. This is again creating more complex policing problems.
“I particularly urge Ministers across government to put more pressure on authorities such as Reform-led Durham county council that are simply failing to act in many cases where irresponsible landlords are allowing their properties to become magnets for crime and disorder, often in previously quiet streets that had very low levels of crime.
“We know that council enforcement teams have got powers to tackle landlords who are refusing to take anti-social behaviour seriously, but too often this simply is not happening.”
When approached by Property118 for comment Durham city council told us the selective licensing scheme helps to tackle anti-social behaviour.
Cllr Joe Quinn, Durham County Council’s Cabinet member for planning, investment and assets, said: “Our residents want the places they live to be free from trouble, which is why we take our role in protecting communities seriously and work closely with partners such as the police to tackle anti-social behaviour.
“We use a range of tools to tackle anti-social behaviour in private rented properties. This includes community protection warnings and notices and, where necessary, closure orders.
“One of the main objectives of our Selective Licensing scheme, which gives us the powers to regulate landlords, is to address anti-social behaviour. The conditions of the licence require landlords to take action where anti-social behaviour is linked to their property.
“We’ve also strengthened conditions around non-student Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMO), with an Article 4 Direction now in place across County Durham to reduce the number of family homes being converted into properties with multiple tenants. We also have an interim policy in place which gives us powers when determining planning applications for HMOs.
“If anyone is worried about behaviour in their community, whether in a town centre or in their neighbourhood, we encourage them to report it to us so that we can take further action. I am also happy to have a conversation with Alan about his concerns.”
As previously reported by Property118, under the Renters’ Rights Act, when using a discretionary ground for possession, landlords will have to prove that anti-social behaviour has occurred, and the court will then decide whether it is reasonable to evict the tenant.
The government guidance provides examples of what counts as anti-social behaviour, covering both criminal and non-criminal behaviour, for example:
However, the government guidance says minor issues such as problems with bins, parking disputes, or one-off incidents do not count as anti-social behaviour.
The government guidance also claims landlords can reduce the risk of anti-social behaviour by asking for a reference from a previous landlord or letting agency.
34 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Previous Article
Rent voids near four weeks despite strong tenant demand
3 weeks ago | 43 comments
2 months ago | 4 comments
3 months ago | 28 comments
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 653
6:52 PM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 16/10/2026 – 13:14
That is anti social behavior directly affecting you and your property and of course a landlord will deal with that.But I don’t see why this MP or anybody else expects a landlord to step in , as an unauthorised policeman and sort out neighbour’s disputes for example.Isn’t that what we pay the police to do.
Member Since October 2025 - Comments: 29
8:41 PM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
What a total idiot.
Give us back section 21.
Simple
Member Since March 2025 - Comments: 2
9:55 AM, 17th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Are MP’s these days naive or just stupid. Get this guy to shadow a landlord trying to deal with and evict a problem tenant. And as already referred to above, where exactly does the government think the many problem tenants are going to go even if successfully evicted – just evaporate perhaps – this is a social problem from far too many years of leniency, excuses for bad behaviour and lack of any deterrent.
Member Since December 2021 - Comments: 2
10:03 AM, 17th October 2026, About 4 days ago
So when are care rental companies going to be responsible for their cars speeding . Is there ANY difference ?
Member Since November 2019 - Comments: 215
11:17 AM, 17th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 16/10/2026 – 18:09
In Reply to Ian , and no support whatsoever from the Council . Who tell them to stay in till the Bailiffs arrive.
Member Since August 2025 - Comments: 3
11:27 AM, 17th October 2026, About 4 days ago
landlords supply housing. What people do with the housing is up to them. We obv want to protect our investment. And long term we want nice neighbours so the area improves and house values increase. But you can’t blame us if the tenants play loud music at 4am. Same as you can’t blame the shop for selling the speakers, booze and snacks…
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1390
11:58 AM, 17th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Cognito at 16/10/2026 – 17:54
In practice, ground 7a is only for tenants convicted of a serious offence related to the property in some way.
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 265
2:34 PM, 17th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Elizabeth Bull at 17/10/2026 – 09:55
MP’s these days are neither naive or stupid. They are just totally self centered. And so their only motivation is virtue signalling to pretend they are good people. They couldn’t care less if they actually improve things for other people.
Member Since September 2026 - Comments: 17
3:52 PM, 17th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Northernpleb at 16/10/2026 – 10:30
Hi Northernpleb,
Yours is the one question in this thread nobody has actually answered, so here’s the honest version.
You have no police powers and you can’t restrain anyone. What you do have is procedural, and it’s worth more than it sounds. On a Ground 14 claim, section 9A of the Housing Act 1988 sets out what the judge must particularly consider, and one of the listed matters is whether the tenant co-operated with any attempt by you to encourage the conduct to cease. So every warning letter you send isn’t paperwork, it’s evidence in your favour.
The bigger lever sits with the neighbours. Under section 104 of the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, once three qualifying complaints have been made about the behaviour, an ASB case review can be demanded, and the Act allows that person or any other person to apply. You can apply on the back of a neighbour’s complaint. The relevant bodies then have to review their own response and tell the applicant what they’ve found and any recommendations.
That’s useful twice over. Section 9A also makes the judge weigh the effect on everyone else, which is exactly what those records are for. And if it ever reaches a closure order running beyond 48 hours, Ground 7A is mandatory, so the court’s discretion falls away.
OJ
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 174
4:19 PM, 17th October 2026, About 4 days ago
It reminds me of the joke about the two psychologists who see a man beaten up face down in the street. One says to the other, the man who did this needs our help…
If councils have a problem with a resident then prosecute them, not their landlord…