3 weeks ago | 43 comments
A Labour MP claims private landlords are allowing anti-social behaviour by their tenants to go unchecked.
In a debate on police funding in the North East, Labour MP Alan Strickland claims councils are failing to act against irresponsible landlords.
Under the Renters’ Rights Act, landlords can evict tenants for anti-social behaviour.
During the debate, Mr Strickland said: “A key concern is about the growth in poorly regulated private landlords who too often allow crime and antisocial behaviour by their tenants to go unchecked. This is again creating more complex policing problems.
“I particularly urge Ministers across government to put more pressure on authorities such as Reform-led Durham county council that are simply failing to act in many cases where irresponsible landlords are allowing their properties to become magnets for crime and disorder, often in previously quiet streets that had very low levels of crime.
“We know that council enforcement teams have got powers to tackle landlords who are refusing to take anti-social behaviour seriously, but too often this simply is not happening.”
When approached by Property118 for comment Durham city council told us the selective licensing scheme helps to tackle anti-social behaviour.
Cllr Joe Quinn, Durham County Council’s Cabinet member for planning, investment and assets, said: “Our residents want the places they live to be free from trouble, which is why we take our role in protecting communities seriously and work closely with partners such as the police to tackle anti-social behaviour.
“We use a range of tools to tackle anti-social behaviour in private rented properties. This includes community protection warnings and notices and, where necessary, closure orders.
“One of the main objectives of our Selective Licensing scheme, which gives us the powers to regulate landlords, is to address anti-social behaviour. The conditions of the licence require landlords to take action where anti-social behaviour is linked to their property.
“We’ve also strengthened conditions around non-student Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMO), with an Article 4 Direction now in place across County Durham to reduce the number of family homes being converted into properties with multiple tenants. We also have an interim policy in place which gives us powers when determining planning applications for HMOs.
“If anyone is worried about behaviour in their community, whether in a town centre or in their neighbourhood, we encourage them to report it to us so that we can take further action. I am also happy to have a conversation with Alan about his concerns.”
As previously reported by Property118, under the Renters’ Rights Act, when using a discretionary ground for possession, landlords will have to prove that anti-social behaviour has occurred, and the court will then decide whether it is reasonable to evict the tenant.
The government guidance provides examples of what counts as anti-social behaviour, covering both criminal and non-criminal behaviour, for example:
However, the government guidance says minor issues such as problems with bins, parking disputes, or one-off incidents do not count as anti-social behaviour.
The government guidance also claims landlords can reduce the risk of anti-social behaviour by asking for a reference from a previous landlord or letting agency.
34 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Previous Article
Rent voids near four weeks despite strong tenant demand
3 weeks ago | 43 comments
2 months ago | 4 comments
3 months ago | 28 comments
Member Since January 2026 - Comments: 16
10:16 AM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
Blame the Landlords again, problem will be getting worse once private rental pool disappears and more tenants cram into what accommodation is available-created by Labour lack of vision
Member Since August 2023 - Comments: 17
10:28 AM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
I bet the Labour MP’s were at the front of the queue to vote to strip lanlords of the tools to manage and evict trouble tenants. Now we are virtually powerless to evict without bullet proof evidence, which is virtually impossible to obtain unless the direct neighbours are brave enough and willing to give detailed testement. There is no joined-up thinking. Just sound bite A’level politics. Where are the adults???
Member Since November 2019 - Comments: 215
10:30 AM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
Have the Council or Police considered Direct action against Anti Social People , Drug Dealers , Criminals etc
Or helping Landlords to evict them .
What Power does the Landlord actually Have..
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 265
10:47 AM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
Politicians have systematically removed all landlords rights to control tenants.
To the point where if a tenant was smashing up the property, if the landlord physically restrained them, HE (the landlord) would get arrested.
Politicians are motivated by virtue signalling, not improving things.
Member Since December 2022 - Comments: 10
11:17 AM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
What a crazy politician – clearly wrong but hey ho – it’s easy to blame the landlord for everything
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 107
11:34 AM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
What I don’t understand is that these stories are all about removing these tenants…so by definition they’ll pop up elsewhere and likely do the same thing. If the police, council etc tackled the TENANTS and made them responsible for their actions, rather than the landlord…then they may learn the errors of their ways. I think it’s called rehabilitation…
Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 653
11:54 AM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
The landlord is not the irresponsible party it is the tenant, the council that fails to act and the government who has removed all power from the landlord to address the situation. Apart from that the landlord has let their property and really it is not up to them to deal with antisocial behavior, it is the police and surely that is up to neighbours to report.
Just throw more mud at the landlord
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3766 - Articles: 5
12:12 PM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
the gov nor police have the interest/resources/ability to deal with this. Last option? Make it the landlords problem. Problem solved apparently….
Member Since November 2025 - Comments: 26
12:32 PM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
We are not a quasi judicial authority. If we try to evict tenants on an accusation, the courts will kick out the cases. If we report problems to the police, most of the time they won’t lift a finger. If the police or the Council report a problem to us, we have to act. In this regard nothing changes. It’s just another idiot politician who doesn’t understand how our businesses work.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1757 - Articles: 3
1:14 PM, 16th October 2026, About 5 days ago
I had a feckless tenant who eventually owed 15 months rent by the time I evicted him. He was violently antisocial and a menace to neighbours, one of whom was a disabled lady with a young child. They all complained to me/my agent, but my hands were tied. After he was arrested for downloading child pornography using a neighbour’s Wi-Fi, I found he had already been convicted for the same crime. The Police wouldn’t do anything about his drink and drug fuelled parties at all times day and night, I also discovered he was breeding pit bulls in the flat, and he was subletting without permission. My only option was a S8 Arrears, but it took over a year, and he wrecked the flat in the meantime.
In hindsight, I should have used a S21; I was badly advised. Even so, it would still have taken months to get a court order and bailiffs, he still would have wrecked the flat, and continued with his antisocial behaviour. Maybe, I should have listened to one of his neighbours who offered a solution!
I lived in London and the flat was near Sheffield. I sold up immediately, but how I would deal with that today under the RRA, I just don’t know. As for this MP, perhaps he should offer his services in face to face criminal tenant dispute resolution.