It’s a numbers game

It’s a numbers game

10:32 AM, 24th June 2019, About 4 years ago 6

Text Size

The latest experience if of a 22 year old couple with a young baby seeking a house, but there is non available. Left Wing journalists and organisations such as Shelter, no matter how well intended, need to understand and assimilate the information before rushing into print and allocating blame!

The average landlord owns just one house (not a flat) which has been let out for around five years. Five years ago the 22 year old couple may not have been a couple and were 17 years old. Below the age of signing a tenancy. Houses are considered Family Accommodation and that is the normal situation.

What appears to be the thinking is that the Private Sector Landlord (PSL) should evict his existing tenant, who is not in default, to make way for a young couple with a child who may or may not be on Housing Benefit (HB).

That does not sound very fair on the established tenant! We are not talking of Homelessness and Rough Sleepers who tend to be aimed at Single Person Accommodation.

The couple do not qualify as vulnerable prior to the baby being born. Hence there is no specific help from the State. It is the Baby that is Vulnerable not the parents.

If the Vitriol is aimed at the PSL then it is targeted at houses. It must surely be obvious that the issue is the under-supply of houses not the allocation of houses. PLSs cannot be expected to evict a perfectly good tenant in order to accommodate, possibly, a more-needy tenant!

The only answer, only answer, only answer is to build more houses. We now have the worst housing crisis since the war.

So what does our 22 year old couple do and that is something Shelter needs to be constructive in addressing and stop kicking PLSs and making rather silly and grossly inappropriate comments about Rachmanism?

In 1995 the average lady was 19 years old when she had her first baby. Now it is 31 years. In 1995 you went to the local council, said you were pregnant and were given the keys to a three bedroomed house. Those days have long gone!

Unless Shelter can be positive and constructive in its comments about Housing Supply then the next Housing Minister needs to consider removing funding for Shelter and see whether the funding, to avoid homelessness, is better spent elsewhere.

It has broken down to a rather simple situation. Single Person Accommodation is provided by Housing Warehouses, but Family Accommodation is provided by PSLs.

It is my view that in an ideal situation a couple of 22 years with a new born baby should live in a two-bed mid terraced house, with a lawn for the baby to play on. However, that is the ideal situation. The reality is somewhat different.

Shelter need to spend its energies on pushing the Housing Minister to massively improve the supply of houses being built.

I wonder who the next Housing Minister will be? A poisoned chalice nobody wants!

Fergus Wilson



11:47 AM, 24th June 2019, About 4 years ago

I'm living in a caravan in my garden so that my 21 year old son, his pregnant girlfriend, my 25 year old daughter and her partner can live in my house as they have nowhere else to go. 5 adults and soon a baby, in a very small, two bedroom, end terraced house. There are no council properties available and due to very insecure employment and low wages, private rentals are not an option.

It's madness, I own 4 houses and can't live in any of them (unless I make my children homeless)!

Shelter were useless when asked for advice. They suggested that my son contact the council to apply for a house despite already being told that they had been on the list for almost a year.

With this advice being given out I wonder if any tenants have any positive regard for the organisation or if they have a similar view of Shelter as landlords do.


12:01 PM, 25th June 2019, About 4 years ago

Thanks Fergus! That is a very well-argued and well-written piece, and it's difficult to see how it can be spelt out any clearer: the root cause of the housing shortage is, well, a shortage of housing!
For Shelter and the Govt to discuss S21, housing lists, more regulation etc, is only to deal with symptoms rather than the true underlying problem.
The private sector can build more houses, but clearly is not building them fast enough (why would they: if they oversupply the market then they undermine their own profitability, just as if everyone grew too many apples and then no-one would expect to pay full price any more.
It is absolutely the role of the public sector to provide public/social housing. And yet they don't/won't/can't.

Mick Roberts

12:08 PM, 25th June 2019, About 4 years ago

And in Nottingham cause of Selective Licensing, we've got to kick a family out cause she's had a baby & are now classed as overcrowding (officially), so that's Landlords fault & we got a generous 18 months to evict the family who are perfectly happy with their house.


12:41 PM, 25th June 2019, About 4 years ago

> The only answer, only answer, only answer is to build more houses.

Much cheaper solution would be to wear more condoms until one can afford a place to raise a child.

Michael Barnes

17:37 PM, 26th June 2019, About 4 years ago

Reply to the comment left by alocjtoi at 25/06/2019 - 12:41
like I did, and was 30 when I bought my first home.


12:38 PM, 29th June 2019, About 4 years ago

I agree with alocjtoi. Too many people are using children as a meal ticket.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership


Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now