Investment strategy for a 55 year old?

Investment strategy for a 55 year old?

9:39 AM, 19th January 2016, About 8 years ago 24

Text Size

My fundamental question is “what property investment strategy would you recommend for a 55 year old starting out today?” The desired end state is to allow me or both of us to become self-employed in the property business and boost pension income.recommend

My wife and I are amateur landlords – two flats with mortgages being rented out and we’ve just finished a buy – renovate – sell property which is in the process of being sold. We’re now considering whether to take a more positive step into property so I’m looking for some advice on strategy.

The reason I emphasise the age bit is due to limitations on finance which are likely to kick in when I get to retirement age of 65-ish. This will undoubtedly impact my strategic thinking or limit my activity beyond 10 years (unless I have reached a self-sustaining financial state).

My mind is split as to the best way forward both with regards to limited company versus private ownership and buy to let or buy/renovate/sell.

Following the Chancellor’s attacks on landlords I’m presently researching the ltd co v private issue with a local property accountant (but happy for recommendations regarding other specialists whom it might be worth talking to) so the main focus of this thread is to investigate my other dilemma (although I recognise that my second decision may also impact on the former).

I think I ‘get’ the start of the normal BTL strategy (buy cheap, add some value, rent out, remortgage, use additional funds to help purchase of next property, repeat) but I’m not sure I understand the end state. What happens when I hit 65/67 and new mortgages become hard to come by and old ones are being called in by lenders?

Granted, the value of the properties will (hopefully) have risen but then so will the size of the mortgage if I have been sucking value out of them to finance newer properties. Is the expectation that my portfolio will be big enough to sell a few to pay off the many or is there another tactic used by people to continue?

Similarly, income; once all costs are taken out (thank you Property118 landlord calculator – really useful) the true gross profit per month is probably going to be around £200-£300/month per property which suggests a minimum requirement of around 10 properties to provide a decent wage plus some left over to keep a cash reserve. Does that seem a logical conclusion or are there other factors/considerations I need to take into account?

The other strategy I’m considering is the buy/renovate/sell model. For the experiment we’re just finishing we took money out of our offset mortgage overpayments, bought a cheap auction property, renovated it and now look to be in line for a net profit of about £15k on an overall investment of £120k over 8 months (and having gone through the process once we now feel we could repeat the process for less money and shorter timescales, thus potentially increasing profits).

Or do we go the third way and do a bit of both?!

Having spent quite some time looking into this I’m starting to get analysis paralysis so would appreciate any thoughts/comments you might have or words of wisdom from your own experience.

Paul


Share This Article


Comments

Paul Temple

12:37 PM, 20th January 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "stuart edwards" at "19/01/2016 - 22:06":

I'm not an accountant or tax expert but, from what I've read elsewhere, I doubt it.

Also, having discussed buy/renovate/sell briefly with an accountant the concern did arise in her mind that doing it once as an individual might be fine but doing it repreatedly as an individual might be seen by the tax man as a business and thus may not qualify for any CGT relief.

I would qualify that statement by saying it was just a quick off the cuff assessment from her and she has gone away to consider the implications in more detail.

adam prospect

19:30 PM, 20th January 2016, About 8 years ago

Some good balance of viewpoints given here.

My experience is buy, renovate, sell has always been most lucrative. It also allows exit from the market should your circumstances change.

Being a LL is a position I hold because I have bought faster than I have sold. But a working debt is one thing if you an employee earning a sizeable wage - like me. But when retired those debts can creep up on you as can legislation changes.

Recognise the risk you are taking. Only thing worse than an empty property is one that is let and the tenant not paying.

I would do something that absolutely makes you bounce in a morning, something that makes you embrace everyday with a gasp of enjoyment. For me that renovations and architecture. If it were something else.....then 'that something else' is what I would be doing.

stuart edwards

20:24 PM, 20th January 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "adam prospect" at "20/01/2016 - 19:30":

I am looking at buy renovate and sell now. But main concern is how feasible is it whilst holding down a full time job and secondly the new stamp duty changes will eat significantly into margins. With regards to cgt ...yes I am aware I would not qualify for relief.

Jonathan Clarke

23:37 PM, 20th January 2016, About 8 years ago

Your age is not the issue.. Finance can be obtained as already outlined. Every strategy has its merits. Mine was buy low add value remortgage release equity and buy another. I`ve sourced 15 properties for a client investor . He started at age 60 and done very nicely.

Your mind set is the only real variable whether you are you are 25 or 55 . Put your heart and soul into it for 10 years and by the time you are 65 you can take your foot of the pedal and enjoy the fruits of your labour for the next 35 years.

Good Luck
.

adam prospect

7:55 AM, 21st January 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Jonathan Clarke" at "20/01/2016 - 23:37":

Without wishing to sound overly philosophical (and this differs dependant on people's age, current viewpoint and assets) - my view was I start enjoying myself today.

Work out what you need to live on and make sure you don't waste time earning more than you need. And when working out the number - don't start with "what I earn and spend today is.....". It is amazing how little real net difference there is in a £60k salary and a £17k pension.

At 47 I already realised I need to spend the capital I have, not accrue more. Happy to have blown it all by 70 - if I am well enough I will go back to work then.

And if I am not well enough to work I will be thankful I didn't wait until then before I decided to enjoy the fruits of my labour.

Jonathan Clarke

9:01 AM, 21st January 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "adam prospect" at "21/01/2016 - 07:55":

That is philosophical but I like that as it goes to the very core of what all of us are trying to actually achieve and what motivates us on a day to day basis. And of course everyone will have an individual answer. Financial wealth does not necessarily equal emotional wealth as we know . The likes of Branson and Buffet do not need to `work` but they still do. Why?

But I don`t like that phrase work. I often replace it with the word hobby or even sport. I enjoy business per se and would miss it if I didn't do it. Its work and a hobby combined . Professional Premier League footballers get paid for scoring goals. They combine the two very effectively Making money is a key side effect of course of the property business but business enjoyment doesn't necessarily have to make money

20 years ago I initiated and helped set up a charitable community bus for the elderly. It needed a business mindset but we didn't aim to make money out of it but it was enjoyable nevertheless

I have made my money but don`t get as much joy as others do out of spending it. Its almost the opposite with me. I appreciate though that others are more spenders than savers. The world needs all types.

When i hit 70 i want 100% the option not to work or do anything if i choose not to or indeed are not physically able to . The choice to do nothing can be intoxicating but also could be debilitating to some who need a focus and a structure to their day

I therefore either at 70 want to have a shed load of money in the bank or/and a healthy passive secure income stream to see me through from 70 to 100.

But everyone is different thank goodness and I agree with you Adam anyone at 55 who starts out needs to consider what investment strategy yes but also what their real end goal is.

The infamous Brian Tracy said something once that made me change my thinking.
He said start at the end of your life with how you actually perceive you really WANT that to be and work back towards the current day. The answers will fall into place.

I like many others had a vague view idea of what i wanted my life to be at 100 but never gave it any real thought I was far to busy with the here and now ..... Buy a property make some money buy a car . Buy another property make some more money eat at a nicer restaurant .Get promotion at work get a nicer kitchen and build a conservatory etc etc.

But when i delved into the end game I actually really wanted....
I was surprised at what i saw.

When i worked backwards towards the current day i was able to adapt my strategy quite significantly and then had a much clearer idea of what I was actually trying to achieve. And of course everyone will have their own route map to success and happiness

stuart edwards

9:18 AM, 21st January 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Jonathan Clarke" at "21/01/2016 - 09:01":

I once read a quote from a millionaire.....the sign of a successful life is to die in debt.....as that means you have enjoyed the last year's of your life on someone else's money

Chris Byways

9:28 AM, 21st January 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "stuart edwards" at "21/01/2016 - 09:18":

He may have to answer to his maker! Not what he might want on his epitaph. I came, I saw, I wasted!

He must have been a Tory councillor. I was a Tory voter until Alice, Devine and this geezer were exposed:

https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2016/1/rogue-tory-landlord-prosecuted-by-his-own-council

Trish

14:38 PM, 23rd January 2016, About 8 years ago

With reference to the discussion about finance for buy to let properties after retirement age:

I'm 66 years old and having real problems with re-mortgaging my buy-to-let properties. Already one of them has reverted to the standard rate (4.79%) at the end of a two year fix. The main problem is that I no longer have a salary, although my income from rental profits plus some consultancy work and state and occupational pension is pretty similiar to the income I had from full time work. Most lenders won't take much of this into account. So whilst I can still get buy2let mortgages to take me up to 75 or 80 years of age, it means hanging in with the same mortgage company I was already with, rather than re-mortgaging and getting the good deals. (not all, e.g. Virgin, have alternative products for borrowers coming off a fixed deal)The Mortgage Works seems to be the best for oldies, but unfortunately won't finance adjoining properties. I have a great mortgage adviser but he is really struggling with this at the moment, and frustrated at the lack of flexibility in B2L lending because, as he says, there are a lot of retired people who own properties that they rent out.

Alison King

16:42 PM, 23rd January 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Tricia Forrester" at "23/01/2016 - 14:38":

People often disagree with my "pay 'em off quick" philosophy, but concerns about being stuck with a lot of costly high interest mortgages post-retirement are amongst my drivers. Your experience has just gone to reinforce those concerns. I very much hope lenders come to reassess this as it seems ridiculous not to take overall income into account.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now