1 month ago | 3 comments
A council has warned landlords that the cost of enforcing the Renters’ Rights Act will be funded through prosecutions and fines imposed on criminal landlords, Somerset Live reports.
Bath and North East Somerset Council admitted during a council meeting that, as the Renters’ Rights Act only came into force last month, limited transition funding is available, and it will need to be supplemented through enforcement action.
Under the act, councils in England will receive £41 million to pay for their new enforcement powers.
As reported in Somerset Live, Matt McCabe, cabinet member responsible for housing, said: “Local authorities now have an enforcement function but there is not necessarily any money for that.
“There is some transition money, but in future it will be that we will have to supplement from prosecutions. Which is not a sensible way forward in my view.”
Chair of the scrutiny panel, Andy Wait (Keynsham East, Liberal Democrat) agreed. He said: “It seems to be payment by results, which is possibly not the right image that you need to put across.”
Bath and North East Somerset Council meeting minutes show a question was raised about how government funding would be used to enforce the Renters’ Rights Act.
The council said: “We are allocating limited funding towards the appointment of a Tenancy Relations Officer, whose role will be to support tenants and address breaches of tenancy standards when necessary.
“In addition, the council is in the process of engaging Bristol City Council’s experienced tenancy team to provide assistance with particularly complex or difficult tenancy matters, especially those that may lead to legal proceedings.”
The news comes as councils across the country are hiring extra staff to tackle selective licensing and the Renters’ Rights Act.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 month ago | 3 comments
1 month ago | 7 comments
2 months ago | 5 comments
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2241 - Articles: 2
2:20 PM, 5th June 2026, About 3 weeks ago
This council obviously does not want any private landlord to house their homeless population.
Member Since November 2019 - Comments: 173
5:37 PM, 5th June 2026, About 3 weeks ago
So Landlords are now viewed as Criminals . The whole system is totally biased..
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3640 - Articles: 5
6:25 PM, 5th June 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Given the lack of accommodation (and getting worse day by day), it might be tenants who start to refuse the Council access to properties. All well and good the council being on your side, but if LL then decided to up and sell where does the tenant go? The councils wont want them on their books….
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 223
3:44 AM, 8th June 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Fines will be flying out quicker than speeding tickets. What I don’t think they have taken into consideration, motorists can not do without a car. Landlords can afford to sell and then they have to re house the tenant in emergency accommodation when there are no more houses available to rent and Hotels and PRS houses are full of migrants, where are people going to go?