Incorrect Solicitors Advice on How to Rent Guide and Prescribed Information?

Incorrect Solicitors Advice on How to Rent Guide and Prescribed Information?

0:01 AM, 14th February 2025, About 2 months ago 7

Text Size

Hello, I’m seeking advice from my fellow landlords, PRS and s21 notice experts on a disagreement with my solicitors regarding the validity of my s21 notice to my tenants.

Barely a week to the expiry of the s21 notice (from all indications tenants do not plan to move out by the date of expiry, so I’m now preparing to seek a court repossession order), my solicitors (whom I engaged 4 weeks ago through my Landlord’s insurance) have informed me that my s21 notice is not valid and will need to be reserved after addressing the following 2 issues:

1. How to Rent Guide sent to the tenants by email is non-compliant as the tenants have not previously consented to receive documents electronically, making the s.21 invalid. I disagree with this because my tenancy agreement signed by myself and the tenants contains a section called ‘Address for Notices’ which states: “For any matter relating to this tenancy, the Tenant may be contacted at the Property or through the phone number or emails…” The property address, tenant’s phone no and email addresses are listed under this clause. My solicitor’s interpretation of this clause is that the tenant may be contacted by email, as opposed to saying that documents may be served on the tenant by email. In the eyes of the law general correspondence and formal service of documents are treated differently and therefore unless there is a clause that states that the Tenant will specifically accept service of documents by email, we can’t rely on this clause as having obtained an agreement from the Tenant to serve the How to Rent Guide by email. On this basis, they have advised serving the Tenant a hard copy of the How to Rent Guide and then a new s.21.

2. Solicitors concluded that the prescribed information document issued to the tenants is incomplete because the document does not state the circumstances when all or part of the deposit may be retained by the landlord, by reference to the terms of the tenancy. I protected the deposit under the MyDeposit insurance scheme. Per guidance from MyDeposit, I gave the tenants a signed copy of the 2-page deposit certificate and the Information for tenants leaflet within 30 days of receipt of the deposit. According to the guidance on the MyDeposit website, both documents constitute the Prescribed Information under their scheme. Section 3 of the deposit certificate document outlines how the requirements of the Housing Act 2004 – Prescribed Information Order have been met by virtue of the 2 documents, including Section 3.g.vi, which instructs the tenant to refer to the Tenancy agreement for details of circumstances when all or part of the deposit will be retained by the Landlord. My tenancy agreement contains clauses which clearly outlines these circumstances.

My solicitors insist that I re-issue a Prescribed Information (PI) document to the tenants which stipulates in a single document all the requirements of the PI including references to the specific clauses in the tenancy agreement outlining circumstances when the deposit may be retained and then serve a new S.21. I am aware that some other deposit schemes provide a PI template that allows for all aspects of the PI to clearly stated out and met on one document, however on the basis that I have followed the MyDeposit guidance on what constitutes the PI under their scheme, I do not agree with my solicitor’s conclusion that my s21 is invalid on this basis.

I would appreciate your views and guidance on the above 2 points with regards the validity of my s21 expiring in a few days. I really do not want (nor do I agree) that I serve a new s21 and wait another 2 months before starting court eviction proceedings.

Many thanks

Rose


Share This Article


Comments

Tessa Shepperson

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

10:26 AM, 14th February 2025, About 2 months ago

Your solicitors are probably correct. The relevant regulations for serviceof the how to rent booklet are The Assured Shorthold Tenancy Notices and Prescribed Requirements (England) Regulations 2015.

S3(3) says:
"The information may be provided to the tenant—

(a) in hard copy; or

(b) where the tenant has notified the landlord, or a person acting on behalf of the landlord, of an e-mail address at which the tenant is content to accept service of notices and other documents given under or in connection with the tenancy, by e-mail"

The clause in your tenancy agreement may be sufficient but it does not specifically say that the email can be used for the service of documents. So the Judge may refuse to accept it.

As regards the deposit point, again, your solicitors have a point. The regulations are here: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/797/article/2/made Section 2(g) sets out the information that must be provided in the prescribed information and (vi) says "the circumstances when all or part of the deposit may be retained by the landlord, by reference to the terms of the tenancy"

This is important as it tells the tenant where in the tenancy agreement they need to look to find out what things the landlord can claim for.

There have been indications in case law that Judges may be willing to overlook some errors, but even if they might be, they may not be prepared to overlook two errors.

Then - do you want to risk this? Section 21 is about to be abolished. If you find out that the Judge is not going to grant a possession order after the Renters Rights Bill comes into force, you may have lost your chance permanently to use section 21.

It is up to you, of course, but the safer option is to take your solicitor's advice and re-serve the notice after taking the necessary corrective action.

Helen

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

11:06 AM, 14th February 2025, About 2 months ago

I have unfortunately had to evict 3 tenants in the past 3 years using Section 8/Section 21. In all cases I used Legal for Landlords who thoroughly checked all my documents and I had to specify how each notice/document was served. They were mostly served by email, particularly when it was served when the tenants renewed. In every case the judge allowed the possession with no problem if it was served by email or even by WhatsApp.
The fact that the Agency's standard forms allow the possibility of various forms of serving notice surely means that all are acceptable. I don't know if you had to pay for your current solicitor but I would get rid of them and use Legal For Landlords for a better service.

Judith Wordsworth

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

12:05 PM, 14th February 2025, About 2 months ago

Do you/did you get the tenant to sign and date a doc (in triplicate) at check in that they had received ALL the required pre-tenancy and tenancy documentation and the doc lists each doc and how and when it was given/sent/delivered?

Jaz Jaz

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

12:07 PM, 14th February 2025, About 2 months ago

Your Point Number 2 in relation to references made in tenancy agreement in what Circumstances Deposit will be withheld" is "CORRECT" as back in 2016 NO Win NO Fees solicitors tried to argue this point but my barrister was able to point out Clause in Tenancy agreement which meant Tenant lost the case and I got possession order granted.

Caroline Crute

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

13:12 PM, 14th February 2025, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Helen at 14/02/2025 - 11:06
We also used LegalforLandlords. Excellent service with reasonable prices.

Mick Roberts

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

7:22 AM, 15th February 2025, About 2 months ago

And reading this, is why any tenant less than perfect can't get a home any more. Why oh Why should it matter how a Right to Rent is served?
But that's the rules they've bought in to try hold up a Landlady getting her own property back. Totally irrelevant, but this is why many of us are selling.
You've evict cause you've not gave her boiler certificate 9 years ago.
Oh but Judge, I've had a new boiler since then, so irrelevant.
Listen here Mr Roberts, the law is the law, no eviction forever.
So new boiler doesn't matter either.
I'm OUT OF HERE.

Londonlad

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

19:26 PM, 15th February 2025, About 2 months ago

Similar position here and serving s21 tomorrow on difficult tenants, planning on also serving a section 13 in 4 weeks time to double the rent when s21 expires in case they try and stay.
Does that make sense ?

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More