8 months ago | 5 comments
The government claim their rental reforms will “reduce demand on the courts,” but industry experts say the opposite is true.
In its Renters’ Rights Act guide, the government insists the county courts won’t be overwhelmed because only “well-evidenced possession cases” will go ahead.
However, Propertymark and the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) warn the Renters’ Rights Act will increase court waiting times and destabilise the private rented sector.
Under the Renters’ Rights Act, Section 21 will be abolished, meaning landlords will need to rely on specific grounds for possession using Section 8 notices.
The government claim this new system will not affect the county court system.
The guide says: “As now, landlords will only need to go through the courts in a small minority of cases where a tenant doesn’t leave at the end of a notice period. Ultimately, we expect our rental reforms to reduce demand on the courts because only cases where there is a clear, well-evidenced ground for possession will be able to proceed.”
The government adds early dispute resolution such as the proposed Private Rented Sector Ombudsman will ease court demand.
The guide adds: “We want to ensure that wherever possible court action is the last resort. The Renters’ Rights Act makes provision for the ombudsman to provide landlord-initiated mediation, enabling disputes to be resolved before they escalate to court. We are working with the Ministry of Justice to explore further options for early dispute resolution.”
However, Propertymark warn the court system is not ready to handle the surge in claims as landlords are already waiting months to regain possession.
Megan Eighteen, President of ARLA Propertymark (Association of Residential Letting Agents), told Property118: “We recognise ambition behind the Renters’ Rights Act, but there remain deep concerns about the readiness of the court system to cope with the anticipated rise in possession and eviction cases the reforms may trigger.
“Removing “no-fault” evictions under Section 21 will shift many cases into contested hearings under Section 8, placing an increased burden on a system already stretched beyond capacity. Recent data shows that, in many parts of England, the time between claim and hearing now routinely stretches to 29 weeks, and in London that wait can extend to as long as 40 weeks.”
The government claim they will invest in the county court system with a digitised possession process, however Propertymark warns without substantial investment, the court system could collapse.
Ms Eighteen adds: “Without substantial investment in court infrastructure, including staffing, digital case management, and improved national consistency, landlords and letting agents will potentially face prolonged delays, uncertainty, and inconsistent outcomes. That in turn undermines the stability of the private rented sector and could discourage landlords from staying in or entering the market, potentially adding further pressure on current rental stock.
“While we support the principle of fairer and more secure renting, we would encourage the UK government to make a properly resourced, modernised court system a precondition for the Act’s implementation.”
The NRLA also warn when the Renters’ Rights Act comes into force, an “inevitable influx” of court cases will put pressure on the courts.
A spokesperson for the NRLA told Property118: “Wait times within the court system have become chronically over-extended over recent years, long before the government announced implementation dates for the Renters’ Rights Act.
“We expect that the introduction of the Act will lead to substantial, additional, increases in court wait times as a consequence of the removal of the accelerated procedure and increased complexity.
“As a result, we continue to urge the government to announce how they intend to reform the process ahead of the inevitable influx of cases into the court system. Without a coherent solution to this problem, there is a huge risk that the issues around court wait times will only be compounded by a lack of action”.
The government say The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government is working with the Judiciary, the Ministry of Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals Service to ensure that the county court is prepared for the changes to the tenancy system.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Government unveils new heat pump grants
8 months ago | 5 comments
7 months ago | 7 comments
5 months ago | 24 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2
11:15 AM, 12th December 2025, About 4 months ago
Why should the government say how it intends to reform the process ahead of the inevitable influx when it claims there will be no influx? In any case, does the government really care?
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1171
2:19 PM, 12th December 2025, About 4 months ago
The Govt know the truth and this is not accidental. Their intention is to slow the process of eviction to ease the burden on local authorities. Theyre quite happy to transfer that burden to the PRS, because no-one cares what happens to landlords.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1642 - Articles: 3
7:03 PM, 12th December 2025, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by DPT at 12/12/2025 – 14:19
If the eviction is properly evidenced and compliant with the process, it will be only a matter of time. Yes, landlords will suffer, but hopefully insurance will cover most delays and costs. But by removing S21, renters probably don’t realise they will become deliberately homeless and not entitled to council support. Hence, councils can no longer tell renters to remain until the S21 notice period expires.
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 204
3:02 AM, 15th December 2025, About 4 months ago
It seems that the intention is to abolish the “accelerated process” and replace it only with the “decelerated process”.
Before long, landlords are going to be so universally risk-averse that it will be nearly as hard to get a rental as it was to escape from Colditz!
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3527 - Articles: 5
9:22 AM, 15th December 2025, About 4 months ago
err…. the Ombudsman is not even in place yet, and S21’s go out of the window on May 1st so at what point do the see a lull in county courts claim exactly?
Total bull about possible ‘mediation’ when it comes to any claims where rent arrears feature.
The “well-evidenced possession cases” will go ahead – yes – and guess what… the majority will be down as selling as the reason.
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1171
12:39 PM, 15th December 2025, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 12/12/2025 – 19:03
Yes, it usually is just a matter of time, but with delays in my local court currently running at 11 months, a landlord facing a total eviction time of between a year and 18 months with a non-paying tenant could be wiped out.
Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 225
1:42 AM, 24th February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by DPT at 15/12/2025 – 12:39
This would be Constructive Dismissal in the Employment domain, but in the context of Private Property it’s absolutely fine to bankrupt investors who have the cheek to try housing people that banks will not lend a mortgage to. Only banks are the winners, as usual..
The delusion that RRB is going to advantage tenants will take some time to reveal, but it will happen. Who will care when government realises what they actually did …
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1642 - Articles: 3
9:50 AM, 24th February 2026, About 2 months ago
My only S8 took 15 months (with no rent) and the debtor trashed my property. If it had been my only BTL and I was reliant on the rent, my flat would have been repossessed and my credit record destroyed. This is what could face young investors going forward, where they don’t have a financial cushion of some sort.
This morning, that intellectual colossus David Lammy, said he will extend the hours for County Court judges and modernise the system to reduce the backlog. 6 years ago (before I retired) I tried to interest the MoJ in my company’s automated AI-driven Courts Management software solution, which included automated online ADR. I was told they had already invested many millions in a new system which was being rolled out. Yeah, right!