Generation Rent and the Evolution of the Private Rented Sector

Generation Rent and the Evolution of the Private Rented Sector

17:09 PM, 5th October 2012, About 12 years ago 5

Text Size

The evolution of the Private Rented Sector is upon us as buy to let renters of the last decade are starting families and the average UK first time buyer is now 37 years old (40 in London). There has been much talk of “Generation Rent”  but how is the letting industry evolving and keeping pace with this rapid change in the demographic of renters and their requirements?

Could letting agents be missing 30% of the Market?

At the NALS conference yesterday two separate speakers suggested that a significant proportion of tenants have children. One cited research to suggest that tenants with children make up 30% of the market, another presented research showing that 1 million PRS homes are let to families with children.

It is logical to assume that these families will not want to move home too often and to many agents this could be in conflict with their business model which relies on tenant churn to earn fees. This begs the question, is that why most letting agents end up managing properties for accidental landlords who generally only have one property to let, possibly two or three?

Are many letting agents missing out?

For most parents, keeping their children in the same school is important. For a portfolio landlord this must be good news as a long term tenancy is far more profitable. Any property which has been lived in for over a year will begin to show wear and tear when a tenant moves out and will need a spruce up to optimise its letting potential. However, if that tenant stays on the requirement for redecoration is likely to be insignificant for several years. Furthermore, tenants don’t like paying fees to renew a tenancy agreement any more than landlords do. Could this be a reason why tenants wanting a long term let seek to deal directly with landlords? Could this also be why most portfolio landlords choose to self manage?

It has occurred to me that agents who choose to adopt a different business model could end up winning significantly more instructions from portfolio landlords. The earnings per unit might fall significantly as a result of introducing a different model for properties let to families but logic tells me that economies of scale and reduced administration may well counter balance as a result of obtaining more instructions from portfolio landlords or landlords with properties better suited to families.

The bottom line for landlords, tenants and letting agents is viability. Right now I’m not convinced that many letting agents are considering how or why the next generation of landlords and tenants will develop and the associated opportunities.

Growth in family lettings

The buy to let boom over the last decade has increased the size of the UK Private Rented Sector by around 80%. The vast majority of the properties built in the last decade and acquired by buy to let investors were flats and apartments. These have also been the property type of choice for first time buyers over the same period. However, many of these buyers and tenants are now getting older and starting their own families. First time buyers of the last decade are choosing not to sell and are letting their former homes, thus spawning a new generation of accidental landlords. These new families, former first time buyers and renters of flats, now require a larger home and for the majority, renting is the only viable solution. Arguably, their requirements are better matched to those of the self managing professional landlords who though accident or prudence chose to go against the trend and invest into larger properties.

The letting agents who are more likely to grow their businesses

I suspect the smart new money being invested into the PRS will be looking to satisfy the demand for larger family homes. Will these investors accept the traditional high fees models of letting agents which involve churn or tenancy renewal fees though, and will their prospective tenants?

The GOOD Landlords CampaignI believe that agents which promote a new business model aimed at this evolving market could well be the ones to enjoy the fastest growth over the next decade. I know a lot of landlords might believe that letting agents would be too short sighted and set in their ways to recognise, let alone grasp this opportunity. However, I have evidence which contradicts this. To my surprise, nearly 50% of the founder members of The GOOD Landlords Campaign to date have been letting agents. Speaking to a few of them at the NALS conference today, it was clear that some letting agents do indeed recognise The GOOD Landlords Campaign as an opportunity to get ahead of their competition by using the “deed of assurance” concept to develop a brand new business model. It was encouraging to speak with agents who plan to leverage the business model promoted by The GOOD Landlords Campaign to gain PR in their own locations via local press and media. This is obviously great news for The GOOD Landlords Campaign but equally, it is excellent news for the next generation of landlords and families wishing to let their properties.

Share This Article


13:09 PM, 6th October 2012, About 12 years ago

So for best length of tenancy, go for LHA families that reference well, smoke and have pets.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

16:59 PM, 6th October 2012, About 12 years ago

Hi Jerry, I definitely agree with you on at least two of the five things you have mentioned above, i.e. go for tenants that reference well and have families. I don't discriminate against pets, smokers and tenants on benefits so long as I have met them in their own homes, like what I see and they can find a home owner guarantor who passes referencing and qualifies for RGI.

Now, let's put these into an order of priority:-

1) You've met them in their home and are happy with how they live
2) They reference well - financial and lifestyle
3) They or their guarantors qualify for RGI
4) They have school aged children

Whether they claim benefits, are smokers and have pets are somewhat immaterial. There is something to be said for accepting these tenants though so long as the four criteria above are met, and that is that they are likely to stay in the property for MUCH longer. It is VERY hard for tenants with own pets, who claim benefits, who smoke or have families to find a landlord who wants to let long term and will accept them. Once they find one, why would they move?

20:42 PM, 6th October 2012, About 12 years ago

never allow any smokers, makes the property unlettable nowadays, ask yourself, would you buy or rent a smelly house, it is almost impossible to eradicate the smell, just say no, we do and it works.

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

23:44 PM, 6th October 2012, About 12 years ago

Alan, what exactly do you say no to. No smokers or no smoking in the house. I am a smoker but I don't smoke in my house. You could let to a none smoker who allows friends to smoke in the house couldn't you? I just say no smoking in the house. I can't see how I could enforce that though, can you?

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

0:51 AM, 7th October 2012, About 12 years ago

PS never underestimate the power of an onion to get rid of smells. Just Google landlords and onions

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership


Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now