End ‘Tax Breaks’ for landlords says Tory think-tank!

End ‘Tax Breaks’ for landlords says Tory think-tank!

14:37 PM, 25th June 2018, About 6 years ago 13

Text Size

Tory MP Neil O’Brien, former aide to George Osborne and Theresa May at No. 10, has produced the first report for radical new Conservative think-tank ‘Onward’ called Green, Pleasant and Affordable. Click here to read the full report.

In this report O’Brien attacks landlords blaming them for pricing younger people out of the housing market. He calls for ending tax breaks for Buy to Let and private landlords with a stronger role for local councils  including reform of the planning system and powers to limit foreign ownership.

O’Brien goes on to claim that the UK is one of the cheapest countries to invest in residential property and draws the link of reduced supply to the home owner market and increasing prices.

O’Brien told the Guardian: ““We need to change the balance between the rented sector and home ownership. We should protect existing landlords but discourage more people from investing in rental property, because the Buy to Let boom has bid up prices and reduced home ownership among younger people.”

At least he does curtain his hostile report by at at least admitting existing landlords should be protected, which flies in the face of exactly what Section 24 mortgage interest relief restrictions did.

The Sun was also told: “”If we’d kept the balance between rented and owner-occupied properties the same since 2000 we’d now have over two million more families owning their own home.”

In the report solutions to the housing crisis included:

  • The government building half a million new flats and houses for workers aged under 40, with hefty discounts of up to a fifth off market value
  • Greater security for renters with tenancies of up to ten years
  • Half a million new Government backed ‘stepladder loans’ to help young people overcome the hurdle of paying a house deposit

It’s the fundamental notion that there are in some way ‘Tax Breaks’ that need to be withdrawn that will confuse landlords the most. Exactly what tax breaks Mr O’Brien?

Onward describes itself as:

“A powerful ideas factory for centre-right thinkers and leaders. We exist to make Britain fairer, more prosperous and more united, by generating a new wave of modernising ideas and a fresh kind of politics that reaches out to new groups of people.

We believe in a mainstream conservatism – one that recognises the value of markets and supports the good that government can do, is unapologetic about standing up to vested interests, and assiduous in supporting the hardworking, aspirational and those left behind. Our goal is to address the needs of the whole country: young as well as old; urban as well as rural; and for all parts of the UK – particularly places that feel neglected or ignored in Westminster.

We will achieve this by developing practical policies that work. Our team has worked both at a high level in government and for successful think tanks. We know how to produce big ideas that resonate with policymakers, the media and the public. We will engage ordinary people across the country and work with them to make our ideas a reality.”

The full report recommendations are:

  1. “Britain should move away from piecemeal, sequential development tacked onto existing villages and towns. Give councils new Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) powers and borrowing capacity so they can buy land and put more development into planned new villages, towns and cities. Require councils to plan infrastructure on the basis of cumulative impacts, not just individual applications.
  2. Tilt policy towards building more in our cities. Revise up housing need figures for the centres for our cities and give cities new powers, including over transport, to enable densification. Extend the powers and resources of Homes England as a regeneration agency, including to support town centre regeneration. Liberalise rules on building upward. Support the growth of other parts of the economy by rebalancing capital spending away from London.
  3. Central government should play a direct role: creating a new generation of garden cities, supporting more integrated planning for transport and housing, and merging the Department for Transport with the housing and planning functions of the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
  4. Give councils borrowing power to buy land and grant themselves planning permission, to enable councils to capture more of the gains from development. Reform the 1961 Land Compensation Act to clarify that local and central government can purchase land at current market use values, not inflated or speculative “hope” values. Reform Section 106 to relax constraints on what councils can charge.
  5. Abolish central government controls which direct how Section 106 receipts are spent. Revise guidance so that more of captured planning gains can be spent on initiatives of direct benefit to existing residents –landscaping, payments for disruption for neighbours, and new community facilities. Build discounted housing with priority for young people with families in the immediate vicinity of development. Prioritise these neighbourhood benefits rather than social housing or other initiatives aimed at the local authority as a whole.
  6. Boost competition to end the UK’s broken model of development and the dominance of vertically integrated ‘developers’ who focus on land assembly. Bring small builders back into the market by requiring some plots on all large new sites to be available to SME builders. Require all options on land to be centrally registered to be valid, revealing who controls what land.
  7. Create incentives to plan for the long term. Where councils are meeting the new Delivery Test, give them more powers to control development, including making views and landscapes enjoyed by existing residents a legally-allowed planning consideration for the first time. Create a category of ‘Outstanding’ local authorities with adopted long-term (10–15 year) plans and make these authorities exempt from rulings from the Planning Inspectorate as long as they continue to meet their plans. Reboot neighbourhood plans by making them more powerful and quicker to create. Prevent developers pre-empting plans by giving more legal weight to emerging plans.
  8. Reform property taxation to limit demand for housing and land as speculative assets. Divert new housing supply to owner occupation. Cut other taxes to encourage investment into businesses and more productive assets. On a grandfathered basis, end loopholes within the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) exemption for the primary residence and reform mortgage interest relief for landlords. In areas where affordability is worst, give councils powers to limit overseas purchases of new homes.
  9. Reset inflation expectations by setting a long-term target to increase affordability, backed up by a new taskforce between HM Treasury and the Bank of England with explicit powers to dampen price inflation.
  10. Create Homes for Younger People (HYP) – a programme to help one million younger households over the next decade – half by helping with deposits for 500,000 new build homes, half by building 500,000 new discounted rental properties for young working people. Fund it through capturing more planning gain and by transferring the remaining local authority housing stock to housing associations.”

Share This Article


Monty Bodkin

8:48 AM, 27th June 2018, About 6 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Tobias Nightingale at 26/06/2018 - 22:11

59% of capital deployed in London

Build to rent is a niche market aimed at a select few.

Not much use if you want to rent a 3 bed semi in Huddersfield.


13:58 PM, 30th June 2018, About 6 years ago

Interesting how nobodies suddenly become important option formers just because they are MP’s. Neil O’Brian stood as the conservative candidate in a District Council by-election in October 2016 in Limpsfield in Surrey. One of the most conservative wards in one of the most conservative local councils in conservative Surrey. He lost by a landslide to a local residents group candidate. Why? Because the housing policies the local council wanted to do and which he had to support as their candidate were so unwanted and hated by residents that people from every political background including large numbers of conservative voted against them. And the views he is now putting forward are almost exactly the views he ran on for the local council on. His reward for not even being able to win a local council election was that the conservative party gave him a safe parliamentary seat in Harborough. Being Teresa Mays bag carrier probably didn’t hurt. The conservatives really do not listen and seem to have a lemming like urge to alienate their natural supporters

Whiteskifreak Surrey

9:25 AM, 2nd July 2018, About 6 years ago

I am worried about the point 8: "On a grandfathered basis, end loopholes within the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) exemption for the primary residence and reform mortgage interest relief for landlords. "
Does it mean we will be paying CGT on the main residence? That is not going to go well with the Conservative MP who bought cheap... Reform mortgage interest relief for landlords seem very dangerous indeed. What do the others think?
I think it is time to pack up and leave this idiotic country for good.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership


Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now