Does dog clause stack up legally?
I have new tenants who indicated they may want to keep a dog at the property for which we would make an additional charge in the form of a higher monthly rent.
The tenants decided not to go with it at the start of the tenancy, so we added a clause in the AST stating it was an option to add a dog by informing us, at which point the additional amount would apply. The additional amount was indicated in the clause.
My question is, does this stack up legally or could it come back to bite me?
The tenant now has a dog and has said they will pay the additional amount as agreed.
The tenancy is in month 7 of a 12 month agreement.
Many thanks
Hardworking Landlord
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
£100,000 Coronavirus emergency donation by ParagonNext Article
Ambiguous CMA guidance over student lets
Member Since November 2013 - Comments: 252 - Articles: 10
9:06 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
This is a useful source of support HL. https://www.mydeposits.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Reasonably-Worded-Pet-Clauses.pdf
Probably better to use email if their dog’s attitude to the postman is anything like ours.
Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 297 - Articles: 1
9:52 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
We generally take the view that a dog causes as much damage or as little damage as children.
We do have a clause in the AST about heavy duty cleaning at exit.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 238 - Articles: 48
9:54 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
We have had a ‘pet form’ for years which our members can use if they allow tenants to keep a pet – which will amend the tenancy agreement to include various pet-related clauses to protect the landlord’s position.
You can read about this here: https://landlordlaw.co.uk/allowing-pets-in-rented-properties/
Member Since March 2019 - Comments: 73
10:02 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
I am so tired of being told what I can or can not do or enforce in MY property.
I have put a lot of money into my properties and want them looked after,not damaged etc.
The government should keep their nose out !!!!!!!!!! I am not breaking any laws and it should be the owner who decides,if pets are allowed and what extra costs etc.
The government does not pay my mortgages,expenses,damages,insurance,loss of rent etc
Member Since February 2015 - Comments: 8
10:23 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
To Paul -I am a landlord of over 30 years standing I have to say I think you have the wrong attitude. Once a tenant is in legal occupation and paying rent it is THEIR home. I think it is right that a landlord should not be able to unreasonably restrict that use. No doubt some other contributors will disagree !
Member Since July 2016 - Comments: 154
10:25 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
If the dog is like the one in the picture, I would allow it.
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190
11:01 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
So anybody able to give a quick answer the Reader’s Question does it stack up legally ?
Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 2
11:05 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
A landlords attitude towards dogs is shaped by their experience. I never had an issue with tenants having dogs until one tenant moved two very large dogs into the property after the tenancy started. I allowed them to stay as didn’t feel I had much choice however when the tenants left the dogs (which were generally kept outside) had badly damaged the (new) upvc window frames and rear door with deep gouges in frames ( from nails) and the edges of window cills chewed off. I’ve had other less serious but equally frustrating damage caused by both cats and dogs which tenants never fully compensate for. (New carpets needed caused by scratching surface away or so many matted hairs it was impossible to professionally clean, unauthorised pet flaps cut into new upvc doors, I could go on!)
Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 1102 - Articles: 1
11:06 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Dylan Morris at 28/05/2020 – 11:01
Without a full review of the tenancy agreement wording, who knows?
Member Since December 2015 - Comments: 828
11:13 AM, 28th May 2020, About 6 years ago
there is unfair contract terms legislation–what if freeholder of flat says no pets–council ha private?