The landlord register is real, it has a date, and the £65 fee is the least important thing about it

Landlord using digital interface with holographic house model to manage property data for a rental database.
8:59 AM, 21st September 2026, 3 days ago 49
Categories:

On 9 September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government confirmed that the PRS Database, now rebranded as the “Register your rental property” service, will begin rolling out on 15 December 2026, starting in the West Midlands.

Every landlord letting on an assured or regulated tenancy in England will need to register themselves and each property, at £65 per property per year, renewable annually. The detailed deadlines sit in the draft Private Rented Sector Database Regulations 2026, laid before Parliament in September, and the accompanying government guidance.

Most of the coverage so far has focused on the fee. Having spent the days since the announcement going through the press release, the campaign guidance, and the underlying provisions of the Renters’ Rights Act 2025, I think three other features of this scheme deserve far more attention than they are currently getting.

First, the dates are staggered by region, and your deadline follows the property, not you

The rollout follows the nine regions of England on a rolling monthly basis. When your region is called forward, you have a three month window to register. After that window closes, councils in that region can begin enforcement activity. The confirmed deadlines, taken directly from the government’s published guidance, are:

Region

Requirement commences

Deadline to register

West Midlands 15 December 2026 14 March 2027
East of England 15 January 2027 14 April 2027
East Midlands 15 February 2027 14 May 2027
South East 15 March 2027 14 June 2027
Yorkshire and Humber 15 April 2027 14 July 2027
North West 15 May 2027 14 August 2027
North East 15 June 2027 14 September 2027
London 15 July 2027 14 October 2027
South West 15 August 2027 14 November 2027

 

Note the pain point for portfolio landlords. Deadlines follow the property, not the owner. A London-based landlord with a flat in Birmingham is in the first wave, not the eighth.

If you hold properties across regions, you will face several different deadlines, though the government has confirmed that voluntary early registration is open to everyone from 15 December 2026, so a portfolio can be registered in one sitting if you prefer. The fee will also be pro-rated during rollout so that landlords called forward first do not pay more than those registering later.

Two further points on scope. Registration currently applies only to properties under let, or which become let during the rollout. Unoccupied properties come later, under future legislation, at which point registration will be required before a property can even be marketed, and landlords and agents will need to include their unique identifiers on adverts.

And there is one narrow exemption: landlords of supported exempt accommodation, as defined in section 12 of the Supported Housing (Regulatory Oversight) Act 2023, are outside the scheme.

Second, this is not a name and address register. You are uploading your compliance file, and your rent

The information requirements are extensive, and they were published alongside the announcement. For each property, landlords will need to provide, among other things: the address, ownership and dwelling type, the number of bedrooms, the number of occupants and households, whether the property requires an HMO licence, an additional licence or a selective licence together with the licence numbers, whether it is let furnished, and, notably, the rent charged and payment frequency, including whether utilities are included.

Then comes the compliance evidence. Where the property has a gas supply, a copy of the gas safety record and its issue date. A copy of the Electrical Installation Condition Report, or the appropriate Electrical Installation Certificate, together with its expiry date. The most recent Energy Performance Certificate, and where the property sits below the minimum energy efficiency standard, details of any registered MEES exemption.

Registration runs through a GOV.UK One Login, with offline routes available for landlords who need them. Letting agents will be able to upload certain information on a landlord’s behalf, but the guidance is explicit that the landlord must start the registration personally and remains legally responsible for everything provided.

Two observations, and I will label them as opinion. The rent disclosure requirement has had almost no scrutiny, and I suspect many landlords do not yet realise they will be reporting their rents to a government database annually.

The government says the information made available to tenants will balance landlords’ privacy concerns against the need for tenants to make informed rental choices, and that the list of publicly visible information will be published at a later stage, so the extent of what tenants will eventually see remains genuinely open.

Secondly, the certificate upload requirement quietly converts the database into a rolling compliance audit. A landlord whose EICR lapsed eight months ago is no longer invisible. That gap will be sitting in a system councils are being funded to police.

Third, the penalties are not really the sanction. The possession bar is

The headline figures are that local authorities can impose a civil penalty of up to £7,000 for an initial breach, rising to up to £40,000 for serious, continuing or repeat breaches, as an alternative to criminal prosecution. Knowingly providing false or misleading information to the database can amount to a criminal offence, and continuing breaches can also expose a landlord to a rent repayment order.

All of those figures are maxima rather than fixed fines, and where a penalty actually lands will depend on the enforcing authority, its published policy, and the conduct in question.

Under the Renters’ Rights Act 2025, once the registration requirement applies in a region, an unregistered landlord is generally unable to obtain a possession order, with the exception of the anti-social behaviour grounds.

Since 1 May 2026, every possession claim already runs through Section 8 of the Housing Act 1988. Stack the two together and the position is: an unregistered landlord with a non-paying tenant may find the courtroom door closed until the registration is put right, with the arrears clock running throughout.

That is a far sharper incentive than any fine, and it is the provision I would expect tenant advisers to check first in every future possession claim.

What I would be doing between now and my regional deadline

None of this requires panic, but it rewards preparation. The landlords who will find registration painless are the ones who can lay hands on every certificate in minutes.

Practically, that means checking now that the gas safety record, EICR and EPC for every property are current, in date, and stored somewhere retrievable, confirming your licensing position where HMO or selective licensing applies, and noting your regional deadline in the diary with a margin.

One final point of fairness to the scheme. For compliant landlords, there is a genuine upside here. Rogue operators undercutting the market on price because they spend nothing on compliance will find that harder once councils can see who is registered and who is not, and the government has said fee income will part fund enforcement staffing.

Whether those resources actually materialise across hundreds of local authorities is another question, but the design at least points in the right direction.

I would be interested to hear how everyone sees this. Are you planning to register everything at once in December, or wait for your regional window? And does the rent disclosure requirement concern anyone else, or am I reading too much into it?

A partnership with Property118

Property118 and LLCR (Landlord Compliance Register) have agreed a partnership for this community. LLCR gives self-managing landlords in England one place to hold every certificate, deadline and document for each property, so that registration, rent increases and possession claims are met with a prepared file rather than a scramble.

Property118 readers receive a 10 per cent lifetime reduction on the Starter and Pro plans, on either monthly or annual billing, using the code PROPERTY118 by clicking here.

https://www.llcr-app.uk/partners/property118?via=neil

Tauhid Islam is a property law paralegal qualifying as a solicitor. He works on tenancy, possession, and compliance matters daily, and founded LLCR, Landlord Compliance Register to give self-managing landlords in England a single place to track every deadline, certificate, and document the law requires of them.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It describes the position in England. Always seek independent legal advice for your specific situation.


Share This Article

  • Member Since May 2021 - Comments: 412

    7:14 PM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by John at 21/09/2026 – 10:32
    The cost is per property not per landlord.

  • Member Since May 2021 - Comments: 412

    7:18 PM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Martin Thomas at 21/09/2026 – 10:45
    Agreed. No one else has to put their salary details on a database for the world and his dog to see. They really do hate us don’t they.

  • Member Since May 2021 - Comments: 412

    7:32 PM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago

    As landlords we have to protect the data of our tenants so are we breaking any privacy laws by putting their details on this database ? Also where do we stand if tenants refuse us to put their details out there ? I’m very sure if I was a tenant I would definitely not want details of me or my tenancy out there. GDPR RULES APPLY TO EVERYONE !

  • Member Since April 2017 - Comments: 175 - Articles: 1

    7:56 PM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by PH at 21/09/2026 – 19:32
    Have I misunderstood? Surely you put how many bedrooms Etcetera and the Rent amount but surely not the actual names of the tenants who happen to be there on the day you do the work?

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 606

    8:44 PM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by PH at 21/09/2026 – 19:32
    Landlords have to follow what the government has ordered by law or face fines. I suggest landlords inform tenants of what they are required to do.Let see if this all blows up in the government face with class actions by tenants and landlords.
    It is appalling that landlords and tenants private financial details will be online for all to see.

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 960

    8:57 PM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago

    I just read some of the questions and I wonder about this one. My final properties is let to two men but the form asks if they are one or two households – I am pretty sure that their relationship status is private and not to be public information!

  • Member Since April 2026 - Comments: 23 - Articles: 15

    10:00 PM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by David at 21/09/2026 – 12:43
    David, I’ll offer a view rather than advice, and it’s only my reading. The first hurdle for any challenge is that the database sits in an Act of Parliament, and a court wouldn’t ordinarily invalidate primary legislation through judicial review, so realistically you’d be going after the regulations or what the operator publishes. But there’s a prior point worth making, which is that the “open register” may not be as open as feared. The Act itself bars the operator from divulging restricted information, and nothing becomes public except under access regulations that haven’t even been laid yet. The only service announced so far is council-facing. So the thing people would want to challenge doesn’t fully exist, and until those regulations appear nobody knows how much the public will actually see.

    Scotland, as an example, has had a searchable landlord register since 2006 and HMO licence registers have been public for twenty years, and as far as I’m aware neither has fallen to a data protection challenge. Never say never, but anyone seriously considering funding that case would want proper counsel’s opinion, not a comment thread 🙂

    On the vacant property, as I read the draft regs you only need an entry if you’re letting the property or advertising it to let. If it’s sitting empty while you sell it, my understanding is there’s nothing to register, and if it’s already on the database you can deactivate the entry. The picture changes if you’re selling with tenants still in place, as the regs handle that situation separately.

    Please feel free to correct me if I’ve read any of this wrongly, we’re all working from draft rules at this point.

  • Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 237

    12:09 AM, 22nd September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by PH at 21/09/2026 – 19:32
    GDPR requires Personally Identifying Information (PII) so typically full name and address or some other identifier that’s in a public register. Obviously NINo or NHSNo aren’t public rather only available to public sector people with a relevant job and reason. Of course landlords have no reason to capture those examples.
    While the property address seems obviously required the tenants full name is not, so let’s see what the regulations bring.
    Tenancy Agreements used to be private..

  • Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 99

    9:00 AM, 22nd September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by PH at 21/09/2026 – 19:18
    It’s what the Third Reich did to the Jews… jewish owned business had to be put onto a special register so they could be identified for special taxes and exit taxes… Nothing is new here… that’s how I feel anyway…

  • Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 99

    9:04 AM, 22nd September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by PAUL BARTLETT at 22/09/2026 – 00:09
    Won’t first names do? Some couples don’t want everyone to know they are living together. It is an invasion of privacy.


Related Articles