2 weeks ago | 101 comments
by Tauhid Islam
On 9 September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government confirmed that the PRS Database, now rebranded as the “Register your rental property” service, will begin rolling out on 15 December 2026, starting in the West Midlands.
Every landlord letting on an assured or regulated tenancy in England will need to register themselves and each property, at £65 per property per year, renewable annually. The detailed deadlines sit in the draft Private Rented Sector Database Regulations 2026, laid before Parliament in September, and the accompanying government guidance.
Most of the coverage so far has focused on the fee. Having spent the days since the announcement going through the press release, the campaign guidance, and the underlying provisions of the Renters’ Rights Act 2025, I think three other features of this scheme deserve far more attention than they are currently getting.
The rollout follows the nine regions of England on a rolling monthly basis. When your region is called forward, you have a three month window to register. After that window closes, councils in that region can begin enforcement activity. The confirmed deadlines, taken directly from the government’s published guidance, are:
Region |
Requirement commences |
Deadline to register |
| West Midlands | 15 December 2026 | 14 March 2027 |
| East of England | 15 January 2027 | 14 April 2027 |
| East Midlands | 15 February 2027 | 14 May 2027 |
| South East | 15 March 2027 | 14 June 2027 |
| Yorkshire and Humber | 15 April 2027 | 14 July 2027 |
| North West | 15 May 2027 | 14 August 2027 |
| North East | 15 June 2027 | 14 September 2027 |
| London | 15 July 2027 | 14 October 2027 |
| South West | 15 August 2027 | 14 November 2027 |
Note the pain point for portfolio landlords. Deadlines follow the property, not the owner. A London-based landlord with a flat in Birmingham is in the first wave, not the eighth.
If you hold properties across regions, you will face several different deadlines, though the government has confirmed that voluntary early registration is open to everyone from 15 December 2026, so a portfolio can be registered in one sitting if you prefer. The fee will also be pro-rated during rollout so that landlords called forward first do not pay more than those registering later.
Two further points on scope. Registration currently applies only to properties under let, or which become let during the rollout. Unoccupied properties come later, under future legislation, at which point registration will be required before a property can even be marketed, and landlords and agents will need to include their unique identifiers on adverts.
And there is one narrow exemption: landlords of supported exempt accommodation, as defined in section 12 of the Supported Housing (Regulatory Oversight) Act 2023, are outside the scheme.
The information requirements are extensive, and they were published alongside the announcement. For each property, landlords will need to provide, among other things: the address, ownership and dwelling type, the number of bedrooms, the number of occupants and households, whether the property requires an HMO licence, an additional licence or a selective licence together with the licence numbers, whether it is let furnished, and, notably, the rent charged and payment frequency, including whether utilities are included.
Then comes the compliance evidence. Where the property has a gas supply, a copy of the gas safety record and its issue date. A copy of the Electrical Installation Condition Report, or the appropriate Electrical Installation Certificate, together with its expiry date. The most recent Energy Performance Certificate, and where the property sits below the minimum energy efficiency standard, details of any registered MEES exemption.
Registration runs through a GOV.UK One Login, with offline routes available for landlords who need them. Letting agents will be able to upload certain information on a landlord’s behalf, but the guidance is explicit that the landlord must start the registration personally and remains legally responsible for everything provided.
Two observations, and I will label them as opinion. The rent disclosure requirement has had almost no scrutiny, and I suspect many landlords do not yet realise they will be reporting their rents to a government database annually.
The government says the information made available to tenants will balance landlords’ privacy concerns against the need for tenants to make informed rental choices, and that the list of publicly visible information will be published at a later stage, so the extent of what tenants will eventually see remains genuinely open.
Secondly, the certificate upload requirement quietly converts the database into a rolling compliance audit. A landlord whose EICR lapsed eight months ago is no longer invisible. That gap will be sitting in a system councils are being funded to police.
The headline figures are that local authorities can impose a civil penalty of up to £7,000 for an initial breach, rising to up to £40,000 for serious, continuing or repeat breaches, as an alternative to criminal prosecution. Knowingly providing false or misleading information to the database can amount to a criminal offence, and continuing breaches can also expose a landlord to a rent repayment order.
All of those figures are maxima rather than fixed fines, and where a penalty actually lands will depend on the enforcing authority, its published policy, and the conduct in question.
Under the Renters’ Rights Act 2025, once the registration requirement applies in a region, an unregistered landlord is generally unable to obtain a possession order, with the exception of the anti-social behaviour grounds.
Since 1 May 2026, every possession claim already runs through Section 8 of the Housing Act 1988. Stack the two together and the position is: an unregistered landlord with a non-paying tenant may find the courtroom door closed until the registration is put right, with the arrears clock running throughout.
That is a far sharper incentive than any fine, and it is the provision I would expect tenant advisers to check first in every future possession claim.
None of this requires panic, but it rewards preparation. The landlords who will find registration painless are the ones who can lay hands on every certificate in minutes.
Practically, that means checking now that the gas safety record, EICR and EPC for every property are current, in date, and stored somewhere retrievable, confirming your licensing position where HMO or selective licensing applies, and noting your regional deadline in the diary with a margin.
One final point of fairness to the scheme. For compliant landlords, there is a genuine upside here. Rogue operators undercutting the market on price because they spend nothing on compliance will find that harder once councils can see who is registered and who is not, and the government has said fee income will part fund enforcement staffing.
Whether those resources actually materialise across hundreds of local authorities is another question, but the design at least points in the right direction.
I would be interested to hear how everyone sees this. Are you planning to register everything at once in December, or wait for your regional window? And does the rent disclosure requirement concern anyone else, or am I reading too much into it?
Property118 and LLCR (Landlord Compliance Register) have agreed a partnership for this community. LLCR gives self-managing landlords in England one place to hold every certificate, deadline and document for each property, so that registration, rent increases and possession claims are met with a prepared file rather than a scramble.
Property118 readers receive a 10 per cent lifetime reduction on the Starter and Pro plans, on either monthly or annual billing, using the code PROPERTY118 by clicking here.
https://www.llcr-app.uk/partners/property118?via=neil
Tauhid Islam is a property law paralegal qualifying as a solicitor. He works on tenancy, possession, and compliance matters daily, and founded LLCR, Landlord Compliance Register to give self-managing landlords in England a single place to track every deadline, certificate, and document the law requires of them.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It describes the position in England. Always seek independent legal advice for your specific situation.
49 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
2 weeks ago | 101 comments
2 weeks ago | 28 comments
1 month ago | 5 comments
Member Since June 2016 - Comments: 8
8:01 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
It’s a landlord register, but an HMRC check. They’ll be cross-referencing with Tax Returns to ensure all rent is declared
Member Since September 2026 - Comments: 2
8:40 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Steve Bower at 21/09/2026 – 08:01
True, it is a tax avoidance database very little of the fee will be used to pay for enforcement. It’s another LL tax to use to plug holes in local council budgets.
Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 1574
8:51 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
“Rogue operators undercutting the market on price because they spend nothing on compliance will find that harder once councils can see who is registered and who is not”
Of course they won’t.
Councils will spend all their time chasing soft target landlords for minor compliance leaving the criminals to act with impunity, as they always have done.
It’s a bureaucrat’s dream that will do nothing to help renters.
Member Since September 2013 - Comments: 129
10:32 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
If property is in joint names with my wife does it mean we have to pay 2 x £65 per property. We tend to only put one of us as the landlord on the tenancy agreement however.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2323 - Articles: 2
10:35 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
It would be helpful if this database gave landlords two months warning of expiring certificates, but of course compliance is not the aim rather fines for non complicance.
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 321
10:45 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
Have they not thought that some tenants might not want the rent they are paying on a public database? Some people are very private about all aspects of their finances. My own remaining tenant said to me just last week regarding discussions with friends etc on rents in the town “We don’t say what we pay” (it’s behind the market). Landlords have a choice to sell up (or not enter) the PRS but most tenants don’t have a choice to be a tenant in it.
A small thing but a very telling insight into the mindset of those ruling over the PRS – arrogant and detached from reality whilst playing games with tenants lives for their own political purposes and advancement.
Member Since August 2018 - Comments: 170
10:45 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
Putting the rent onto the database means that anyone can tot up a landlord’s income to assess whether they might be worth burgling. I think it’s an intrusion and I’m surprised nobody has said that it might be in contravention of our human rights to display this information.
Member Since April 2026 - Comments: 23 - Articles: 15
11:00 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by John at 21/09/2026 – 10:32
Hi John, it should be one fee, not two. Under the draft Database Regulations the fee attaches to the property registration, not the person. Reg 6(5) charges it when the property entry is made and reg 10(2) on each renewal, and registering yourself as a landlord is free. Only one active entry per property is allowed anyway. So joint ownership shouldn’t change anything, though these are still draft regulations so the detail could move before your region goes live.
One thing to watch. Where a tenancy is granted in joint names, my reading is each joint landlord probably needs their own free landlord entry, and possession on nearly every ground is blocked while the register isn’t right. The drafting isn’t clear on this yet, so if both of you are ever on the agreement I’d just register both. Costs nothing. If only one of you is named as landlord, that’s the person who registers.
Happy to be corrected if anyone reads the draft regs differently, the detail here is still settling.
Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 828
11:01 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
I dont want my market rent tenants knowing what my discounted (due to be exceptionally good tenants) pay. It will create bad feeling and give them a weapon against me when I increase their rent in line with market rents
To me this equates to communism – when you can’t let the market decide
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1366
11:45 AM, 21st September 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Steve Bower at 21/09/2026 – 08:01
“It’s a landlord register, but an HMRC check. They’ll be cross-referencing with Tax Returns to ensure all rent is declared”
I think that ship sailed when Gov’t announced that rent review cases would be moving to the HMRC valuation unit.