The landlord register is real, it has a date, and the £65 fee is the least important thing about it

Landlord using digital interface with holographic house model to manage property data for a rental database.
8:59 AM, 21st September 2026, 2 weeks ago 88
Categories:

On 9 September 2026, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government confirmed that the PRS Database, now rebranded as the “Register your rental property” service, will begin rolling out on 15 December 2026, starting in the West Midlands.

Every landlord letting on an assured or regulated tenancy in England will need to register themselves and each property, at £65 per property per year, renewable annually. The detailed deadlines sit in the draft Private Rented Sector Database Regulations 2026, laid before Parliament in September, and the accompanying government guidance.

Most of the coverage so far has focused on the fee. Having spent the days since the announcement going through the press release, the campaign guidance, and the underlying provisions of the Renters’ Rights Act 2025, I think three other features of this scheme deserve far more attention than they are currently getting.

First, the dates are staggered by region, and your deadline follows the property, not you

The rollout follows the nine regions of England on a rolling monthly basis. When your region is called forward, you have a three month window to register. After that window closes, councils in that region can begin enforcement activity. The confirmed deadlines, taken directly from the government’s published guidance, are:

Region

Requirement commences

Deadline to register

West Midlands 15 December 2026 14 March 2027
East of England 15 January 2027 14 April 2027
East Midlands 15 February 2027 14 May 2027
South East 15 March 2027 14 June 2027
Yorkshire and Humber 15 April 2027 14 July 2027
North West 15 May 2027 14 August 2027
North East 15 June 2027 14 September 2027
London 15 July 2027 14 October 2027
South West 15 August 2027 14 November 2027

 

Note the pain point for portfolio landlords. Deadlines follow the property, not the owner. A London-based landlord with a flat in Birmingham is in the first wave, not the eighth.

If you hold properties across regions, you will face several different deadlines, though the government has confirmed that voluntary early registration is open to everyone from 15 December 2026, so a portfolio can be registered in one sitting if you prefer. The fee will also be pro-rated during rollout so that landlords called forward first do not pay more than those registering later.

Two further points on scope. Registration currently applies only to properties under let, or which become let during the rollout. Unoccupied properties come later, under future legislation, at which point registration will be required before a property can even be marketed, and landlords and agents will need to include their unique identifiers on adverts.

And there is one narrow exemption: landlords of supported exempt accommodation, as defined in section 12 of the Supported Housing (Regulatory Oversight) Act 2023, are outside the scheme.

Second, this is not a name and address register. You are uploading your compliance file, and your rent

The information requirements are extensive, and they were published alongside the announcement. For each property, landlords will need to provide, among other things: the address, ownership and dwelling type, the number of bedrooms, the number of occupants and households, whether the property requires an HMO licence, an additional licence or a selective licence together with the licence numbers, whether it is let furnished, and, notably, the rent charged and payment frequency, including whether utilities are included.

Then comes the compliance evidence. Where the property has a gas supply, a copy of the gas safety record and its issue date. A copy of the Electrical Installation Condition Report, or the appropriate Electrical Installation Certificate, together with its expiry date. The most recent Energy Performance Certificate, and where the property sits below the minimum energy efficiency standard, details of any registered MEES exemption.

Registration runs through a GOV.UK One Login, with offline routes available for landlords who need them. Letting agents will be able to upload certain information on a landlord’s behalf, but the guidance is explicit that the landlord must start the registration personally and remains legally responsible for everything provided.

Two observations, and I will label them as opinion. The rent disclosure requirement has had almost no scrutiny, and I suspect many landlords do not yet realise they will be reporting their rents to a government database annually.

The government says the information made available to tenants will balance landlords’ privacy concerns against the need for tenants to make informed rental choices, and that the list of publicly visible information will be published at a later stage, so the extent of what tenants will eventually see remains genuinely open.

Secondly, the certificate upload requirement quietly converts the database into a rolling compliance audit. A landlord whose EICR lapsed eight months ago is no longer invisible. That gap will be sitting in a system councils are being funded to police.

Third, the penalties are not really the sanction. The possession bar is

The headline figures are that local authorities can impose a civil penalty of up to £7,000 for an initial breach, rising to up to £40,000 for serious, continuing or repeat breaches, as an alternative to criminal prosecution. Knowingly providing false or misleading information to the database can amount to a criminal offence, and continuing breaches can also expose a landlord to a rent repayment order.

All of those figures are maxima rather than fixed fines, and where a penalty actually lands will depend on the enforcing authority, its published policy, and the conduct in question.

Under the Renters’ Rights Act 2025, once the registration requirement applies in a region, an unregistered landlord is generally unable to obtain a possession order, with the exception of the anti-social behaviour grounds.

Since 1 May 2026, every possession claim already runs through Section 8 of the Housing Act 1988. Stack the two together and the position is: an unregistered landlord with a non-paying tenant may find the courtroom door closed until the registration is put right, with the arrears clock running throughout.

That is a far sharper incentive than any fine, and it is the provision I would expect tenant advisers to check first in every future possession claim.

What I would be doing between now and my regional deadline

None of this requires panic, but it rewards preparation. The landlords who will find registration painless are the ones who can lay hands on every certificate in minutes.

Practically, that means checking now that the gas safety record, EICR and EPC for every property are current, in date, and stored somewhere retrievable, confirming your licensing position where HMO or selective licensing applies, and noting your regional deadline in the diary with a margin.

One final point of fairness to the scheme. For compliant landlords, there is a genuine upside here. Rogue operators undercutting the market on price because they spend nothing on compliance will find that harder once councils can see who is registered and who is not, and the government has said fee income will part fund enforcement staffing.

Whether those resources actually materialise across hundreds of local authorities is another question, but the design at least points in the right direction.

I would be interested to hear how everyone sees this. Are you planning to register everything at once in December, or wait for your regional window? And does the rent disclosure requirement concern anyone else, or am I reading too much into it?

A partnership with Property118

Property118 and LLCR (Landlord Compliance Register) have agreed a partnership for this community. LLCR gives self-managing landlords in England one place to hold every certificate, deadline and document for each property, so that registration, rent increases and possession claims are met with a prepared file rather than a scramble.

Property118 readers receive a 10 per cent lifetime reduction on the Starter and Pro plans, on either monthly or annual billing, using the code PROPERTY118 by clicking here.

https://www.llcr-app.uk/partners/property118?via=neil

Tauhid Islam is a property law paralegal qualifying as a solicitor. He works on tenancy, possession, and compliance matters daily, and founded LLCR, Landlord Compliance Register to give self-managing landlords in England a single place to track every deadline, certificate, and document the law requires of them.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It describes the position in England. Always seek independent legal advice for your specific situation.


Share This Article

  • Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 105

    1:20 PM, 30th September 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 30/09/2026 – 12:43
    Hi Keith, Thank you for your insight, I really need some help with this as I do feel frightened. My ‘one of my names’, post code and house number will match up with information held by HMRC as they have all my names. I am also very concerned about information like DOB and NI number because that gives scammers a free entry into almost any aspect of anyone’s life.

    And as the Lichtenstein version of online companies house was breached a few months ago and all the individuals’ details copied, it is pretty unnerving, and that was before the more recent AI warnings!

    I’m not trying to deceive, but I don’t want to be a sitting duck ether.

    The only properties I have kept in my portfolio are those worth investing in w r t EPC, with lovely tenants with whom I have a really good relationship, because I am a genuinely decent landlord.

    However, we all know extreme people exist who might just have a pop at any landlord simply because they are a landlord.

    Time to write to my MP, who is in the Labour party and will probably send me a condescending reply full of guff and hot air. Ho hum…..

  • Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 338

    1:57 PM, 30th September 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Sally Robinson at 13:20
    Hopefully NI number and DOB won’t be publicly visible, that is effectively the govt inviting identity theft. As I understand it there are two stages, the compilation of a landlord register for official bodies to use and then the public facing part will be introduced after.

    Remembering that DVLA has DOB and NI number for every driver. Whilst it’s clearly shown on my licence, the driving licence number itself features a block of six numbers which are DOB in a mixed up format and anyone renting a car needs to provide NI number, the hire company puts it into a database which shows any endorsements.

    Data breaches are always a worry but that’s where we are in many areas of life with our details, let’s hope they keep ahead of the crooks and AI.

  • Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 105

    2:06 PM, 30th September 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 30/09/2026 – 13:57
    Thank you again, and lucky old me has never had a driving endorsement. I had forgotten about DVLA, but then they probably get a lot of money to run their organisation as road vehicles get a high priority don’t they?

  • Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 338

    2:18 PM, 30th September 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Sally Robinson at 30/09/2026 – 14:06
    I think I’ve remembered right that DVLA had a very amusing attempt at giving drivers privacy on their licence back in the 1970s. It was printed at the bottom with a dotted line inviting people to cut it off if they wished.

    Rather futile with it being in the licence number with a little re-arranging!

  • Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 338

    2:33 PM, 30th September 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 30/09/2026 – 14:18
    *DOB

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 627

    4:17 PM, 30th September 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 30/09/2026 – 13:57
    Haven’t we all had enough of data breaches without this government adding extra layers for criminals to breach,
    I already have to worry about protecting my tenant’s data which is more work .
    “Hopefully” this government will keep ahead of the crooks doesn’t cut it with me, because they will fail, even if they cared.
    They seem to be heading for a complete invasion of privacy to screw every last penny out, and a State run Khrushchevkas style rental housing system with no room for individuals.

  • Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 338

    5:13 PM, 30th September 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by David at 30/09/2026 – 16:17
    Tenants generally have to rent. Do I have to be a landlord? No, despite being a landlord since 1990 building a decent sized portfolio – initially housing mainly the people excluded from council housing as it was sold off and not replaced, then adding HMOs for housing Blair’s 50% target of university attendance, I started selling in 2015 and just one to go when the tenants leave next year.

    My details are on so many databases that one more would pale into insignificance when I consider what has been thrown at us (S24 especially for me and the RRA making a simple workable tenancy process for student turnover into a gamble and I went through additional HMO licensing managed by an incompetent council who hadn’t even built the database a year after charging me a lot, lot more than £65 a property.

    I’m sure you’ve had some of the above as well. For me an ISA growing invested with REITS effectively giving tax free rental income and potential tax free gains wins hands down without the hassle. Theoretically the online account could be hacked but putting it under the mattress isn’t secure either.

    And, seriously, why is the check for licence endorsements under the current paperless system when taking a hire car or courtesy car from a main dealer done on NI number when I obviously have a driving licence with its own number. Hacking potential of the main DVLA database and the dealer has a photo of my licence and obviously knows name and address with DOB and then NI number on top.

    I still do it though for the convenience. Without some hope we might as well all give up.

  • Member Since April 2018 - Comments: 627

    4:10 PM, 1st October 2026, About 8 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 30/09/2026 – 17:13
    Yes perhaps the extra layer of data collection does pale in to insignificance after all the data already collected on landlords and individuals but it is just this steady creep that worries me especially with a Socialist government filled with Communists.. They have already attacked ISA’s for many people so that’s not safe from their grubby mitts, Next could be removal of the Triple Lock for pensioners, then complete removal of ISAs for everyone.


Related Articles