The continuing Renters' Rights Act nightmare - what happens if the first month's rent isn't paid?

The continuing Renters’ Rights Act nightmare – what happens if the first month’s rent isn’t paid?

Rules for landlords ending a tenancy, showing hands holding house and keys
9:55 AM, 29th December 2025, 3 months ago 103

In a Property118 comment on 27 December, member “Spock” said:

“I have a student property. Traditionally, I have always asked for the rent payment for the first month a few days before the start of the tenancy start date. I never hand out keys until I know that everyone has paid the first month’s rent. If I can’t receive any rent before day 1, then if even one person hasn’t paid, then I can’t hand out any keys, which obviously creates problems. Have I read this correctly ? Am I unable to accept any rent before day 1?”

I’m guessing there may be other landlords wondering this. Here is my answer.

You don’t have to wait for the rent until Day 1, but you must not refuse to hand over the keys after the agreement has been signed. If you do, there is a real risk that you may have to pay fines (called “penalties”) of up to £40,000.

When both landlord and tenant have signed a tenancy agreement for a new Assured Tenancy, the tenancy is said to have been “entered into”. Usually, the agreement will be dated when the last person who is a party to the agreement has signed. If the commencement date of the tenancy is a later date then the time between the two dates is called the “permitted pre-tenancy period”.

You can accept rent in advance during (not before) the permitted pre-tenancy period, just as you have done in the past. This is limited to one month’s rent or 28 days rent if the rent payment period is less than a month. You can also accept payment of the agreed deposit up to the cap.

So far there is not really much if any, change to what you have been doing. But after the tenancy has been entered into you cannot refuse to hand over the keys even if the tenant never pays the first month’s rent, because that amounts to preventing occupation, which is equivalent to unlawful eviction or unlawful exclusion. That is an offence under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 and now carries civil penalties of up to £40,000 under section 58 of the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 as an alternative to prosecution.

Make no mistake, refusing to hand over the keys is a serious offence.

If the tenant does not pay the first month’s rent and has moved in, then you can issue a notice under s.8 of the Housing Act 1988 specifying ground 10 and giving 4 weeks’ notice before you start court proceedings. But ground 10 is discretionary. The judge might refuse to grant an order for possession, or give the tenant time to pay, so that you would have to go back to the court again if the tenant never pays any rent.

Alternatively, you can wait until there are three months’ rent arrears and then give a four‑week section 8 notice specifying Ground 8 (serious rent arrears). You could also specify Ground 11 (persistent delay in paying rent). Note that there must be 3 months’ rent outstanding both on the date of the Section 8 notice and on the date of the hearing.

Tenants who understand this and want to game the system can, in practice, go a long time without paying rent.

Suppose the landlord and tenant meet on 1st May 2026 and both sign an agreement for a tenancy to start on 14th May. The landlord cannot ask for any rent until the agreement has been entered into. As soon as it is signed, the landlord asks for the first month’s rent, expecting the tenant to transfer the money there and then because that is what the agreement says they should do. The tenant says they will pay it on the day they move in. On 14th May, they meet at the property, and the landlord asks for the rent. The tenant says it will be paid the next day. The landlord cannot refuse to hand over the keys. They must give the keys to the tenant and let them move in.

The rent never arrives. The landlord gives 4 weeks’ notice specifying ground 10 expiring (say) 12th June and issues proceedings the next day. The court lists a hearing date of 10 August. The tenant has never paid any rent, but the court has discretion, and after hearing the tenant’s sad tale of woe, the judge grants 3 weeks to pay.

The tenant never pays. On 1 September, there are 3 months’ arrears outstanding, so rather than pursue the original claim, the landlord serves a new notice specifying ground 8 and on 30 September issues proceedings for a second time.

The hearing is on 25 November, and this time the court does grant an order for possession. The landlord pays to transfer the claim to the High Court for a writ of possession, and the bailiffs arrive at the property on 27 January 2027. The tenant has gone and has left the property in perhaps not quite as good a state as it was on 1 May 2026. The landlord has had no rent since the last tenant left, many months ago; meanwhile, they have been paying the mortgage, the insurance, and all the costs of the proceedings.

The tenant has lived rent-free for about 8 months.

All this was explained to the government during the committee stage of the Bill, but they ignored it.

Michael


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 763

    3:13 PM, 1st January 2026, About 3 months ago

    You forgot to add that the tenant may leave some belongings in the property which you have to lovingly look after for them

  • Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 195

    3:28 PM, 1st January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 30/12/2025 – 09:46
    But it isn’t yet, so work with it until it is, which, if you’re glass half full, will never be

  • Member Since July 2024 - Comments: 112

    3:40 AM, 3rd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by JohnCaversham at 29/12/2025 – 10:43

    I am about to chase 2 guarantor.. I’ve done a letter before action, both deposits have been claimed & received. Ive offered to take less if paid by Jan 7th.. next is MCOL? Also does MCOL cover a guarantor in Ireland ? Advice appreciated..

  • Member Since July 2024 - Comments: 112

    3:50 AM, 3rd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by JaSam at 30/12/2025 – 20:09
    Goodlord does not provide rgi, I approached them

  • Member Since April 2021 - Comments: 120

    7:42 AM, 3rd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Having checked this out, my full understanding is under the Renters’ Rights Act, a clause requiring first month’s rent and deposit payment “after” signing but before tenancy start (keys handover) is generally permissible, as the Act bans taking rent “before” signing. The key is the timing: signing first, then payment before possession, keeping it within the one-month rent advance limit.

  • Member Since November 2020 - Comments: 51

    8:30 AM, 3rd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by JohnCaversham at 29/12/2025 – 10:43
    I prefer tenants who don’t need guarantors

  • Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 763

    8:39 AM, 3rd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Londonlad at 03/01/2026 – 08:30
    I prefer tenants who dont need a guarantor but have one anyway. In this climate you need prunes on your allbran

  • Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 195

    1:10 PM, 3rd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Londonlad at 03/01/2026 – 08:30
    As this article is primarily about student let, and given that paying for the full term is ostensibly banned, a guarantor is the only way, is it not?

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1137

    5:13 PM, 3rd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    I’ve been looking through the amended Protection from Eviction Act, the RRA and the guidance to local authorities on penalties and its not obvious, (at least to me so far) what penalty or fine could be levied by the local authority where a landlord prevents an applicant that has already signed the tenancy agreement from taking possession. The Acts refer only to an existing occupier either in relation to prevention of occupation or harassment and the only real provision for pre-tenancy applicants relates to discrimination and fees. I’m sure that if they could make a case for one of the discrimination categories, they would, but otherwise there may be no option for a civil penalty. They may assist the applicant to sue for breach of contract. They may also threaten to apply for a banning order, perhaps under Protection from Harassment Act 1997, (which is broader than the PfE definition), although the landlord may have a defence in some circumstances. They may also ask the Housing Ombudsman to get involved once that office comes on stream and I’ve no idea what they would make of it.

    I may well have missed something glaringly obvious and a lot of this is still very unclear and untested anyway, but I think it will important to keep asking the question of the lawyers to ensure that rogue tenants can’t just move into a property without paying rent.

  • Member Since December 2025 - Comments: 31

    5:46 PM, 3rd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by DPT at 03/01/2026 – 17:13
    DPT – I agree with all you say, but at the risk of repetition I think the biggest potential problem is a zealous Housing Officer with a strong financial incentive to issue Notices which would, probably, result in the landlord paying for professional advice simply because the penalties are potentially so large. In today’s world the process is often the punishment and even if the landlord is not actually committing an offence by the time the matter is cleared up they are going to be out of pocket and stressed. I personally would not take the risk of withholding keys.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or