The continuing Renters’ Rights Act nightmare – what happens if the first month’s rent isn’t paid?
In a Property118 comment on 27 December, member “Spock” said:
“I have a student property. Traditionally, I have always asked for the rent payment for the first month a few days before the start of the tenancy start date. I never hand out keys until I know that everyone has paid the first month’s rent. If I can’t receive any rent before day 1, then if even one person hasn’t paid, then I can’t hand out any keys, which obviously creates problems. Have I read this correctly ? Am I unable to accept any rent before day 1?”
I’m guessing there may be other landlords wondering this. Here is my answer.
You don’t have to wait for the rent until Day 1, but you must not refuse to hand over the keys after the agreement has been signed. If you do, there is a real risk that you may have to pay fines (called “penalties”) of up to £40,000.
When both landlord and tenant have signed a tenancy agreement for a new Assured Tenancy, the tenancy is said to have been “entered into”. Usually, the agreement will be dated when the last person who is a party to the agreement has signed. If the commencement date of the tenancy is a later date then the time between the two dates is called the “permitted pre-tenancy period”.
You can accept rent in advance during (not before) the permitted pre-tenancy period, just as you have done in the past. This is limited to one month’s rent or 28 days rent if the rent payment period is less than a month. You can also accept payment of the agreed deposit up to the cap.
So far there is not really much if any, change to what you have been doing. But after the tenancy has been entered into you cannot refuse to hand over the keys even if the tenant never pays the first month’s rent, because that amounts to preventing occupation, which is equivalent to unlawful eviction or unlawful exclusion. That is an offence under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 and now carries civil penalties of up to £40,000 under section 58 of the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 as an alternative to prosecution.
Make no mistake, refusing to hand over the keys is a serious offence.
If the tenant does not pay the first month’s rent and has moved in, then you can issue a notice under s.8 of the Housing Act 1988 specifying ground 10 and giving 4 weeks’ notice before you start court proceedings. But ground 10 is discretionary. The judge might refuse to grant an order for possession, or give the tenant time to pay, so that you would have to go back to the court again if the tenant never pays any rent.
Alternatively, you can wait until there are three months’ rent arrears and then give a four‑week section 8 notice specifying Ground 8 (serious rent arrears). You could also specify Ground 11 (persistent delay in paying rent). Note that there must be 3 months’ rent outstanding both on the date of the Section 8 notice and on the date of the hearing.
Tenants who understand this and want to game the system can, in practice, go a long time without paying rent.
Suppose the landlord and tenant meet on 1st May 2026 and both sign an agreement for a tenancy to start on 14th May. The landlord cannot ask for any rent until the agreement has been entered into. As soon as it is signed, the landlord asks for the first month’s rent, expecting the tenant to transfer the money there and then because that is what the agreement says they should do. The tenant says they will pay it on the day they move in. On 14th May, they meet at the property, and the landlord asks for the rent. The tenant says it will be paid the next day. The landlord cannot refuse to hand over the keys. They must give the keys to the tenant and let them move in.
The rent never arrives. The landlord gives 4 weeks’ notice specifying ground 10 expiring (say) 12th June and issues proceedings the next day. The court lists a hearing date of 10 August. The tenant has never paid any rent, but the court has discretion, and after hearing the tenant’s sad tale of woe, the judge grants 3 weeks to pay.
The tenant never pays. On 1 September, there are 3 months’ arrears outstanding, so rather than pursue the original claim, the landlord serves a new notice specifying ground 8 and on 30 September issues proceedings for a second time.
The hearing is on 25 November, and this time the court does grant an order for possession. The landlord pays to transfer the claim to the High Court for a writ of possession, and the bailiffs arrive at the property on 27 January 2027. The tenant has gone and has left the property in perhaps not quite as good a state as it was on 1 May 2026. The landlord has had no rent since the last tenant left, many months ago; meanwhile, they have been paying the mortgage, the insurance, and all the costs of the proceedings.
The tenant has lived rent-free for about 8 months.
All this was explained to the government during the committee stage of the Bill, but they ignored it.
Michael
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since December 2025 - Comments: 31
10:05 AM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
Hi everyone – I am the author of this post – if I have made any mistakes please do tell me – it strikes me this is a really important issue and we must make sure we all understand the new rules correctly.
Member Since July 2014 - Comments: 150
10:43 AM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
Who on earth would ever want to be llrd..!
Guarantors every time is the only way to go..
There was talk at one point od G’s being banned if I remember as it discriminated against those who couldn’t provide one.
Whole system aimed at pushing out the small players.
Member Since December 2015 - Comments: 292
10:54 AM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
Just make sure they don’t die, get dementia or are so aggressive and threatening that even the Krays would right off the arrears.
Yes been there got the T-shirt and no longer rent out homes to tenants .
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2188 - Articles: 2
10:58 AM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
I hope that the government imposes similar restrictions with online sales, then we can get everything free from Amazon and eBay, utopia! Oh, and once we have ordered anything, the supplier must continue to give us free goods until they obtain a court order.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 45
11:11 AM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
And on 20th November, they pay some of the rent so that there is no longer 3 month’s outstanding, the hearing cannot go ahead, and then they stop paying again.
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1137
11:25 AM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Michael Crofts at 29/12/2025 – 10:05
My understanding is that currently in law a tenancy arises only when a tenant takes posession or the grant is made by a deed. Almost all tenancy agreements are drafted as a contract and if the applicant is prevented from moving in, they can sue for breach of contract but not unlawful eviction as they dont yet have a tenancy.
I havent seen anything in the RRA to change this position, but as you say, there are now more penalties for things like preventing lawful occupation and it remains to be seen how these will be implemented by local authorities and/or interpreted by courts.
When the Bill was first published, the housing lawyer David Smith did say that it may be possible to make the tenancy subject to prior payment of the rent, but he wasn’t sure at that point and I havent read anything on this since. I think the Government’s position is that if the first months rent is not paid, the applicant should still be allowed to move in and dealt with through the courts.
Member Since December 2022 - Comments: 30
11:59 AM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
My suggestion is a simple one to resolve this. When you hand over the keys you receive cash for the first month’s rent and make this a condition in the contract. Meet the tenants in person, old fashioned way.
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190
11:59 AM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
It’s terrible state of affairs. But I think if you’ve been unfortunate enough to come across a non paying tenant like this, even if they were required to pay the first month’s rent, subsequent rent will go unpaid anyway. So you’ve had one months rent but nothing else. So the problem is hardly any different.
Referencing is the key. It makes sense to ask for the prospective tenant’s bank statements to see they operate their account impeccably, see salary credits and make sure they have both the deposit AND the first months rent in their account. Also obtain not only payslips and P60 but an employer’s reference in case they’re under threat of redundancy. Of course you can come across a deliberate non payer and the way to reduce this likelihood is to ensure they’ve rented before and paid on time. This is done by asking for 12 months bank statements to see rent payments going out to current landlord. Pay in cash ? Sorry that does not meet my underwriting criteria. Next applicant please.
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190
12:09 PM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Karen Dodd at 29/12/2025 – 11:59
You will end up with a £40,000 fine if you do this.
Member Since December 2025 - Comments: 4
12:31 PM, 29th December 2025, About 3 months ago
This is exactly the issue many landlords are only just clocking.
The key takeaway for me is that the risk point has shifted from “before move-in” to “after signing.” Once the tenancy is entered into, withholding keys becomes a serious offence, even if no rent has been paid.
In practice, that means landlords need to tighten pre-signing checks, not rely on “we’ll sort the rent on day one” as a safeguard. After signing, your leverage is almost entirely procedural and slow.
For student lets especially, this feels like a material change in risk allocation — one that wasn’t realistically mitigated by the remedies the legislation points to.
Ignoring this won’t make it go away; structuring around it is now essential.